LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
2010 Webby Award Winner for Best Political Blog
 
May 26, 2012
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     gay marriage     barack obama     robert scheer     chris hedges     ndaa
Most Read

TED: 'A Money-Soaked Orgy of Self-Congratulatory Futurism'

Truthdiggers of the Week: 400,000 Canadians Launching the ‘Maple Spring’

I Can't Hear Myself Think

Russia and Exxon Mobil Sign Arctic Oil Deal

A Rare Admission That Money Trumps Everything Else

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
Why Bain Questions Matter
OSHA Struggles When Tower Climbers Die

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Better Than We Found It
The Good-Natured Dictator

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101

Truthdig Bazaar

Our Daily Bread

By Lauren B. Davis

more items

 
Ear to the Ground

No Impeachment for South Carolina Governor

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   

Posted on Dec 9, 2009
Mark Sanford
thenewliberator.wordpress.com

South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford’s affair with an Argentine may have exacted a personal cost and made him more vulnerable politically, but it looks as if his conduct won’t cost him his job. A panel of his state’s lawmakers have decided his indiscretions don’t merit impeachment.  —KA

ABC News:

Lawmakers were still considering whether to recommend an official reprimand.

Six of the seven panel members said they believed the events surrounding Sanford’s extramarital affair involving an Argentine woman did not rise to a high enough level to warrant his removal from office prior to the end of his second and final term in January 2011.

“We can’t impeach for hypocrisy. We can’t impeach for arrogance. We can’t impeach an officeholder for his lack of leadership skills,” said Rep. James Harrison, the Columbia Republican who headed the panel.

[...] The decision breathes new life into Sanford’s remaining 13 months as governor, though he still faces further legislative votes on the official rebuke. He’s also the subject of a State Ethics Commission hearing on more than three dozen civil charges involving his use of state planes, pricey commercial airlines seats and campaign money.

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


New and Improved Comments

We are launching a major overhaul of our comments section.

In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread.

Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts.

Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with.

Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page.

By Faith martin, March 17, 2010 at 11:02 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

It is a travesty that they cannot or choose to not impeach him.  He left without telling the people.  That seems totally wrong. That should of been enough to impeach him.  And if he used 1 penny to arrive at his illicit affair that should be enough also. Like the governors car taking him to the airport. Somebody made the statement that he was not removed because he was a democrat?  I guess that stems from Clinton.  I do wish they would have impeached Clinton.  Because now any indiscretian goes unpunished.  And that is a sin.

Report this

By Not Always So, December 11, 2009 at 6:09 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

But we can impeach for theft of services, ie. using public monies for personal reasons.
If I was say, a custodian in the capital bldg and used a state vehicle to go and get lunch at McDonald’s and was found out, I’d be fired. Get It?

Report this

By purplewolf, December 10, 2009 at 11:27 am Link to this comment

As the Queen of Hearts would say: OFF WITH HIS HEAD! You decide which one.

Report this

By msgmi, December 10, 2009 at 11:11 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

It’s up to the state ethics commission to determine if Stanford illegaly used state funds for his personal benefit. If it finds him culpable, he should be removed from office. Either way, this C-Street member of The Family will be loved for better or worse.

Report this

By mad_world, December 10, 2009 at 5:06 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

What about leaving your post without indicating your substitute and not letting
anyone know where you are?

Report this

By Arm, December 10, 2009 at 1:16 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

As usual a politician get away with incompetence.  They can do no wrong.  All of them are corrupt and cheaters.  We vote them into office and they piss on us.
We need to vote them out of office.  Shame on them.  They also gave themselves a raise, whereas we received no raise of our Social Security.

Report this

By ChaoticGood, December 9, 2009 at 2:40 pm Link to this comment

Unbelievable!

“We can’t impeach for hypocrisy. We can’t impeach for arrogance. We can’t impeach an officeholder for his lack of leadership skills,” said Rep. James Harrison, the Columbia Republican who headed the panel.

Remember Bill Clinton?
Oh, I forgot, he’s a Democrat….

Report this
Newsletter

Get Truthdig in your inbox


 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2012 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.