Mar 11, 2014
NYPD’s Stop-and-Frisk Tactics Ruled Unconstitutional
Posted on Aug 12, 2013
A federal judge ruled Monday that controversial “stop-and-frisk” searches—carried out by New York City police officers on predominantly black and Latino residents—are unconstitutional, and ordered that an independent, federal monitor be brought in to oversee reform.
The decision is a major victory for civil rights activists who have long argued that the practice amounts to racial profiling. U.S. District Judge Shira Scheindlin said the stops violate individuals’ right to privacy and equal treatment under the law. She said testimony led her to believe that the NYPD carries out more stops of blacks and Hispanics, “even when other variables are held constant.”
“This is so even in areas with low crime rates, racially heterogenous populations, or predominantly white populations,” Scheindlin ruled. “In practice,” she wrote in a 195-page ruling, “the policy encourages the targeting of young black and Hispanic men based on their prevalence in local crime complaints. This is a form of racial profiling.”
Over the past decade, roughly 5 million people have been stopped by the NYPD, The Guardian reports. The vast majority have been African-American or Latino, and roughly nine out of 10 have walked away without an arrest or a ticket.
—Posted by Alexander Reed Kelly.
Previous item: What’s Holding Back America’s Education System?
Next item: Cargo Ship Sails for Arctic Shortcut
New and Improved Comments