LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
2010 Webby Award Winner for Best Political Blog
 
May 26, 2012
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     gay marriage     barack obama     chris hedges     ndaa     robert scheer
Most Read

TED: 'A Money-Soaked Orgy of Self-Congratulatory Futurism'

Truthdiggers of the Week: 400,000 Canadians Launching the ‘Maple Spring’

Russia and Exxon Mobil Sign Arctic Oil Deal

I Can't Hear Myself Think

A Rare Admission That Money Trumps Everything Else

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
Why Bain Questions Matter
OSHA Struggles When Tower Climbers Die

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Better Than We Found It
The Good-Natured Dictator

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101

Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Net Neutrality’s Last Stand

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   

Posted on Apr 9, 2010
Comcast
Flickr / Knight725

The future of the Internet looked a little bleaker to Net neutrality advocates this week after the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals decided that the Federal Communications Commission couldn’t stop Internet service provider Comcast from messing with the load times of certain websites at its discretion. That was but one pro-corporate implication of Tuesday’s decision, as Nick Baumann points out in this Mother Jones report, but there is a small glimmer of hope left on the horizon.  —KA

Mother Jones:

The ruling doesn’t just affect the ISPs’ ability to control load times. It could also allow them to restrict what information you get for your monthly broadband payment. In the worst-case scenario, Internet providers could require you to buy access to websites in “packages”—a social networking “package” with Facebook and MySpace, a sports package with ESPN.com and Rivals.com, or a music package with Last.fm and Pandora. Instead of today’s “Wild West,” the future Internet might look more like cable television.

If the FCC wants to avoid that, it has three options. It could appeal Tuesday’s ruling to the Supreme Court. But Comcast has already won once, and the litigation could take years. The agency could ask Congress to give it more power to enforce net neutrality. That’s what a bill proposed by Reps. Ed Markey (D-Mass), Anna Eshoo (D-Calif), and Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) would do. But the telecoms have enormous influence on both parties—since 1989, AT&T has spent more on national politics than any other company, union, or special interest. Even if the legislation cleared the House, it would likely stall in the Senate.

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


New and Improved Comments

We are launching a major overhaul of our comments section.

In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread.

Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts.

Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with.

Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page.

Leefeller's avatar

By Leefeller, April 11, 2010 at 8:51 am Link to this comment

Since I use a satellite to access the web, seems I have an undisclosed limited broadband time of usage, according to an unclear discretion of the satellite company.  In addition to satellite discretion I have all the luck in the word, to pay a hefty fee for the service.  Since I love paying hefty fees, if they started charging me for programing like cable TV, most probably I will drop my satellite service and be able to spend the money on necessitates of life like good quality Tequila. 

Though I will reminisce about Truth Dig for a period of time, and especially miss the constant chicken little dance routines, good Tequila is hard to take, but I will somehow survive.

Report this
thebeerdoctor's avatar

By thebeerdoctor, April 9, 2010 at 4:07 pm Link to this comment

I notice that in the coverage of Comcast etc., no one mentions Apple and Steve Jobs Stalinist decision to ban Adobe flash on its I-gadgets. How strange that people fork over cash to a company that decides what they are allowed to look at. But even now there will be complaints about net neutrality from people using the I-Phone.

Report this
amunaor's avatar

By amunaor, April 9, 2010 at 12:46 pm Link to this comment

Doh!

Money is the noose by which to choke off - restrict access.

The Internet will morph into another Info-tainment tool; monopoly to atrophied mind!

The Chinese would love this new Comcast model!

Report this
Anarcissie's avatar

By Anarcissie, April 9, 2010 at 12:28 pm Link to this comment

Has anyone told Chris Hedges about this, so he can begin celebrating the death of anarchy on the Internet?

Actually, the celebration might be a little premature.  The carriers are powerful, but so are their opponents—people like Google—and millions of geeks taken together who form a considerable body of opinionated people, some with interesting talents.  The ISPs and carriers also complete with one another (supposedly) and to the extent that they disadvantage their customers they may lose them to a competitor.  Moreover, many congresspersons are favorable to Net neutrality.  So it’s not over yet.

Sorry, Chris.

Report this
rico, suave's avatar

By rico, suave, April 9, 2010 at 12:13 pm Link to this comment

What does charging for access to certain sites have to do with “neutrality?”

Report this

By Big B, April 9, 2010 at 11:53 am Link to this comment

Oh well, that’s how the capitalist cookie crumbles.

This was like being tied to the train tracks, you could see it coming and there wasn’t a damn thing you could do about it.

The only good thing down the road is that comcast and the other cable giants have been very slow (and cheap) in investing in wireless technology. If wireless continues to develope and widen it’s bandwidth signature this “net neutrality” issue could go the way of the Dodo, along with the giant cable companies.

Good riddence.

Report this
Newsletter

Get Truthdig in your inbox


 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2012 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.