LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
2010 Webby Award Winner for Best Political Blog
 
May 26, 2012
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     gay marriage     barack obama     robert scheer     chris hedges     ndaa
Most Read

TED: 'A Money-Soaked Orgy of Self-Congratulatory Futurism'

Truthdiggers of the Week: 400,000 Canadians Launching the ‘Maple Spring’

Russia and Exxon Mobil Sign Arctic Oil Deal

I Can't Hear Myself Think

A Rare Admission That Money Trumps Everything Else

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
Why Bain Questions Matter
OSHA Struggles When Tower Climbers Die

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Better Than We Found It
The Good-Natured Dictator

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101

Truthdig Bazaar
Yogi Berra: Eternal Yankee

Yogi Berra: Eternal Yankee

By Allen Barra
$18.45

more items

 
Ear to the Ground

NASA: The World Won’t End in 2012

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   

Posted on Jan 2, 2012
Wikimedia Commons / Brandonc (CC-BY-SA)

Sorry, all you Mayan-influenced doomsday enthusiasts, but it’s looking to some of the great minds over at NASA as though 2012 isn’t going to be particularly apocalypse-friendly as such. Ancient augury versus contemporary astronomy: Who will prevail?  —KA

MSNBC:

One fear is that a rogue planet that has been dubbed “Nibiru” or “Planet X” is supposedly aimed at Earth. Self-proclaimed Nibiru expert Nancy Lieder, who says she is in contact with the aliens from Zeta Reticuli, first said Nibiru would cause widespread disaster in May 2003, only to change it to Dec. 21, 2012.

There is, however, no evidence that Nibiru is real.

“Nibiru is ridiculous because it doesn’t exist — it never existed as anything other than a figment of the imagination by pseudo-scientists who don’t seem bothered by a complete lack of evidence,” astronomer Don Yeomans, manager of NASA’s Near-Earth Object program office at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif., told SPACE.com.

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


New and Improved Comments

We are launching a major overhaul of our comments section.

In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread.

Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts.

Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with.

Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page.

By Dr. Rat, January 3 at 11:01 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

gerard,  Just a note of thanks, as you remind readers that the stockpiling of nuclear weapons by ANY nation is a palpable indication of insanity.

Leading the world by example, a supposed Obama tenet, is a thing of which we are incapable. In ten-million years, as the descendants of today’s crafty and durable sewer-rats emerge as the new-thinkers, they will decypher your comments, perhaps on some fragment of petrified newsprint, and nod to each other, “look at this, one of them wasn’t stupid.”

Report this

By Marian Griffith, January 3 at 4:54 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Expecting the world to end because the mayan calendar ran out is about as silly as predicting that the world had to end some 60000 years ago when Urm the Neanderthaler ran out of fingers to count the days on…
Or that the world ended after the year 999 because we could not figure out which number came after that.

Then again, the end of the world is predicted for every other year (and in good years we get two or three predictions at once), so I suppose it satisfies some deep seated need in humans.

And when have self-proclaimed experts ever been bothered by a lack of facts? Thanks to the tireless efforts of those who see their convictions threatened by facts, science has now been so vilified that refering to it is more likely to discredit your argument than to support it.

Report this

By gerard, January 2 at 5:40 pm Link to this comment

Articles like this are a challenge to people who think that they know something about politics or history and that they have something worthwhile to say about what passes in daily conversation as “world affairs.”  But what can be said—even by the most profound scholar—about whether or not the world is going to end, and if so, when?
  And as to those who believe they know the answer to this question (which has been asked and re-answered tens of thousands of times during tens of thousands of years, and always wrongly, well, what can one possibly say beyond “Hmmmmm?
  Stories about the end of the world, however, can have a revealing and awakening effect.  When it comes down to the how and the why, things can get really exciting.  Who will do it?  How will it occur?  Will it be fire or water?  Or something else?  Why will it happen? Who said so? Will I and my family be saved?  How? Who said? 
  It seems that ever since the world was inhabited by “thinking” (so-called) beings, some wizard has stepped onstage from time to time and claimed
special insight into the Unknowable Ignorance of Creation. Sucn prophets have abilities to convince ordinary people to scare each other half to death with news that, in the blink of an eye,  pushes known facts completely out of sight
  How come the facts of science and math and the laws of chance and inevitability made perilously obvious by a number of demonstrably insane nations who possess nuclear bombs are blithely overlooked year after year while the fantastical and amorphous existence of a “Mayan Calendar Prediction” receives serious attention? 
  On balance, it does seem wiser to concentrate on how to avoid a possible nuclear holocaust and ignore the more nebulous mystery of inscrutable divinations.

Report this
Newsletter

Get Truthdig in your inbox


 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2012 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.