Dec 5, 2013
Millions of Verizon Phone Records Secretly Collected Daily (Video)
Posted on Jun 6, 2013
The National Security Agency is collecting the telephone records of millions of American customers of Verizon via an order that requires the company to hand over the records on an “ongoing, daily basis,” Glenn Greenwald reports in The Guardian.
The monitored calls are both within the U.S. and between U.S. parties and parties in other countries. For the first time, the public sees documentation that the Obama administration is engaged in a massive violation of what were once regarded as civil liberties of privacy by indiscriminately collecting millions of communication records regardless of whether the callers are suspected of doing anything wrong.
The order was granted by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court on April 25 of this year. It gave the government unlimited authority to obtain the records through July 19. It requires that the numbers of both parties be revealed, as well as location data, “unique identifiers,” and the time and duration of the calls. The data does not reveal the content of the conversations.
The order forbids Verizon from informing the public of the order and the existence of the FBI’s request of customer records.
The NSA, the White House and the Department of Justice all declined to comment when The Guardian approached them about the order in advance of publication of the story Wednesday.
As a presidential candidate in 2008, President Obama pledged to order the attorney general to “conduct a comprehensive review of all our surveillance programs, and to make further recommendations on any steps needed to preserve civil liberties and to prevent executive branch abuse in the future.” Instead of that review, however, it appears likely that Obama’s Justice Department will pursue the source of the leak of the order to The Guardian.
That probability was confirmed after publication of The Guardian’s article by Pete Williams, a Justice correspondent for NBC News whom The Huffington Post described as “well sourced.”
The disclosure could shove the issue of privacy back into the media spotlight. Kate Martin of the Center for National Security Studies, a civil liberties advocacy group, was quoted in The New York Times as saying: “absent some explanation I haven’t thought of, this looks like the largest assault on privacy since the N.S.A. wiretapped Americans in clear violation of the law” under the Bush administration. “On what possible basis has the government refused to tell us that it believes that the law authorizes this kind of request?”
—Posted by Alexander Reed Kelly
Previous item: U.K. to Offer Reparations to Victims of Colonial Torture
New and Improved Comments