Top Leaderboard, Site wide
August 22, 2014
Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines
Help us grow by sharing
and liking Truthdig:
Sign up for Truthdig's Email NewsletterLike Truthdig on FacebookFollow Truthdig on TwitterSubscribe to Truthdig's RSS Feed


sign up to get updates

Climate and Economy Fan Flames in Spain

Truthdig Bazaar more items

Ear to the Ground

Making Sense of the Financial Reform Bill

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on May 21, 2010
Flickr / epicharmus (CC-BY)

The Senate passed on Thursday what The Wall Street Journal described as “the most extensive overhaul of financial-sector regulation since the 1930s.” The New York Times breaks down what’s in the bill and how it might change when reconciled with the House version. Worth noting: Democrats Russ Feingold and Maria Cantwell voted against the measure. Both have been pressing for tougher regulation than what ended up in the Senate bill.

New York Times:

The Senate on Thursday approved a far-reaching financial regulatory bill, putting Congress on the brink of approving a broad expansion of government oversight of the increasingly complex banking system and financial markets.

The legislation is intended to prevent a repeat of the 2008 crisis, but also reshapes the role of numerous federal agencies and vastly empowers the Federal Reserve in an attempt to predict and contain future debacles.

Read more

More Below the Ad


Square, Site wide

New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By dihey, May 22, 2010 at 4:26 am Link to this comment

Feingold and Cantwell voted no because the Senate version will not prevent another eco-financial meltdown like the one that hit the world in 2008. F & C also understand that the “no bailout” provision will be overridden by Congress in the next eco-financial meltdown.

Report this

By jack, May 22, 2010 at 12:32 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

re:   Just charge a nickel a share for transactions.

or a 1% Tobin Tax on all transactions - whatever works to get these bleeding
money grubbers to pay their fair share - tax every transaction - every one - just
like every penny’s worth of tobacco, licquer, petrol, even communications
bandwidth is taxed - and if they whine about it, take ‘em to the wood shed and
spank them till they squeal like the little pigs they are - discipline these little sods

Report this

By SteveL, May 21, 2010 at 8:50 pm Link to this comment

Shares held for 11 seconds.  Just charge a nickel a share for transactions.  Wall Street owes the US for the bailout.

Report this

By FRTothus, May 21, 2010 at 9:09 am Link to this comment

“I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around [the banks] will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs.”
(Thomas Jefferson)

Report this
Right 1, Site wide - BlogAds Premium
Right 2, Site wide - Blogads
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
Right Skyscraper, Site Wide
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion   Publisher, Zuade Kaufman   Editor, Robert Scheer
© 2014 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.