Top Leaderboard, Site wide
Left Masthead
July 25, 2016
Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines
Sign up for Truthdig's Email NewsletterLike Truthdig on FacebookFollow Truthdig on TwitterSubscribe to Truthdig's RSS Feed

American Amnesia
Neither Snow Nor Rain

Truthdig Bazaar
Nuclear Iran

Nuclear Iran

Jeremy Bernstein

more items

Ear to the Ground
Print this item

Loughner Trial Moves to San Diego

Posted on Feb 20, 2011

The trial of Jared Loughner, the alleged shooter who killed six people in an assassination attempt on U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, is being moved from Tucson to San Diego because of worries over pretrial publicity and heightened local sensitivities. —JCL

The Examiner:

The federal trial of Jared Loughner has been moved from Tucson to San Diego due to the pretrial publicity and local sensitivities surrounding the case over concerns Loughner may not get a fair trial in a traumatized Arizona.

Legal experts say the venue change could mean Loughner is less likely to be sentenced to death since California is considered to be less conservative than Arizona.

It was on Jan. 8, 2011, outside a supermarket in Tucson, Arizona, when Loughner went on a mass shooting spree killing six people, wounding 13 in an assassination attempt on U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords who survived after being shot at point blank range to the head.

Read more

More Below the Ad


Square, Site wide

New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

zonth_zonth's avatar

By zonth_zonth, February 23, 2011 at 6:40 pm Link to this comment

Pusilanimous couch potatoes will not see the signs of revolution in the US even if it boxed their ears. This event more likely is secondary to having guns in the hands of confused ignorant unstable indivuals who conveniently may fit a criteria in the DSMV-4 psychology manual of diagnosis. Also it is somehow societies fault for not “voicing” their obvservations of aberant behavior earlier.

The media will paint any social unrest at a political event resulting in injury or death as an ‘assasination attempt’.

Report this

By reynolds, February 21, 2011 at 8:02 pm Link to this comment

what’s prejudicial? dismissing a seriously mentally ill
person as an “asshole” for starters, maybe.

Report this

By Eric, February 21, 2011 at 3:05 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Where is compassion this guy is one of millions of the mentally ill among us he was a functioning in an impaired manner wake up look at your neighbors and voice the need for mental health care.

Report this

By knute, February 21, 2011 at 10:42 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I do think this mad dog deserves to be put down, given the fact that we already know without a doubt and witnessed what he did, and the fact that it was premeditated. But I am alittle suspicous that this picture of him is the only one anyone has seen from the media. Is there another agenda at work showing us all this poster boy for capital punishment ?

Report this

By par4, February 21, 2011 at 8:51 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

The day after the funerals he should have been tried,convicted and then executed. This is another sign of our totally dysfunctional government/justice system. The victims and their families suffer a grave injustice. The citizens and tax payers bear the burden of incarcerating this murderer all so some misguided people can feel they are compassionate. Corrupt lawyers,judges and ‘journalists’ from the ‘news’ media will make big bucks sensationalizing this event.

Report this

By SteveL, February 21, 2011 at 12:28 am Link to this comment

California has had more than its share of sensational trials. What do we need this
mess for?

Report this

By realveive, February 20, 2011 at 8:24 pm Link to this comment

What’s prejudicial?  Plenty of witnesses saw this asshole do what he did.  The “trial” should take an hour and he ought to be in the ground the next day at the latest.

Report this

By gerard, February 20, 2011 at 4:58 pm Link to this comment

I agree that this photo is probably prejudicial in the eyes of most people—unless that is really what he looks like.  To judge that, one would have to see other photos. That means that withholding other photos is an act that could prejudice his trial, hence unfair—even though he has pled guilty(because of insanity?  or what?) 
  No matter what, this case is going to be one tough call for defense attorneys!

Report this

By Rodney, February 20, 2011 at 3:22 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Maybe California can do a better job of keeping guns out of his hands.

Report this
Right 1, Site wide - BlogAds Premium
Right 2, Site wide - Blogads
Right Skyscraper, Site Wide
Right Internal Skyscraper, Site wide
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Like Truthdig on Facebook