Why can Gadhaffi follow U.N. resolutions and Israel can’t?

Looks like we’ve entered a new era of international foreign intrigue.  Whenever there is an armed struggle against a sitting regime the UN can now decide whether the regime in question is allowed to survive.  I wonder how the rebels in East Timor would have fared? Or the ones in Columbia? How about the Cuban anti-Castroites.  What about the Shining Path in Peru.  This could get pretty interesting in the future.  I’ll bet about now Qaddafi wishes he had a nuke!  Funny that the two major powers on the Security Council with veto power abstained——-were they bought off or is Russia anxious to see how their air defense system works.  As for China anything that costs the USA money or perhaps reputation is a win for them.  But in any event, Qaddafi is toast——the rebels will be supported until they push Qaddafi out.  Now we know why NK and Iran are pursuing nukes——you need a deterrent against UN resolutions that foment regime change policies from without!

Geez, if all it takes to stop a dictator’s slaughter of his rebelling citizens is a UN resolution, the UN should print and stock a bundle of these resolutions, so they’ll be ready at a moment’s notice for all future revolutions, and we won’t have to waste all the time and lives we did on this Libyan debacle.