Top Leaderboard, Site wide
Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines
June 28, 2017 Disclaimer: Please read.

Statements and opinions expressed in articles are those of the authors, not Truthdig. Truthdig takes no responsibility for such statements or opinions.

Senate Leaders Scramble for a Deal on Health Care Bill

What’s Next for the Bill Cosby Sex-Assault Case?

Truthdig Bazaar
Becoming Enemies: U.S.-Iran Relations and the Iran-Iraq War

Becoming Enemies: U.S.-Iran Relations and the Iran-Iraq War

James G. Blight, Janet M. Lang, Hussein Banai; Malcolm Byrne, John Tirman

more items

Ear to the Ground
Email this item Print this item

Koch Brothers Stand to Make $100 Billion From Keystone Pipeline

Posted on Oct 21, 2013
Shannon Ramos (CC-BY)

Through their investments and various subsidiaries, Charles and David Koch could make a fortune from the transcontinental oil pipeline, contrary to previous Koch claims.

The Koch brothers have become well known (and despised by many progressives) for their right-wing political activism. The Huffington Post reports that a progressive think tank, the International Forum on Globalization, has been studying Koch investments and properties, including 2 million acres of land in Alberta, Canada. The IFG also estimates that the Kochs have spent about $50 million lobbying pro-Keystone think tanks and members of Congress.

The Keystone pipeline is supposed to bring synthetic crude oil from Canada all the way down to the Gulf Coast of the United States, where it would be refined. It has become something of a unifying cause for the environmental movement, which sees continued investment in fossil fuels as a calamitous proposition when we are already suffering the effects of climate change. And of course there’s no way to build a toxic tube across the continent without affecting the environment.

Activists succeeded in getting the Obama administration to delay a Keystone decision, but many rich and influential people, beyond the Koch brothers, stand to benefit from the pipeline’s construction and it will take a huge effort from environmentalists to counter their sway in Washington.

—Posted by Peter Z. Scheer

Correction: A previous version of this post had an error in the headline. It said $100 million when it should have said billion.

New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

Join the conversation

Load Comments
Right Top, Site wide - Care2
Right Skyscraper, Site Wide
Right Internal Skyscraper, Site wide

Like Truthdig on Facebook