|
|
May 24, 2013
|
|
Kagan Grilled by Senate Panel on Military Recruitment BanPosted on Jun 29, 2010
The Senate Judiciary Committee and Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan faced off Tuesday on the second day of Kagan’s confirmation hearing, and as expected, certain committee members were eager to zero in on the issue of her decision to temporarily block military recruiters from Harvard as a protest against the military’s contested “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy regarding gay and lesbian service members. —KA
Advertisement New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By Blackspeare, June 29, 2010 at 5:37 pm Link to this comment
All she needs is 51 votes. If Harriet Myers had been in the political position that Kagan is today, Myers would today be a justice——you just gotta be in the right place at the right time.
Report thisBy MarthaA, June 29, 2010 at 3:17 pm Link to this comment
“Kagan indicates support for limiting corporate spending on elections”...“she has shown signs in the past of being a strong defender of First Amendment rights.” — Alec MacGillis & Amy Goldstein, Washington Post Staff Writers, Tuesday, June 29, 2010; 4:47 PM
Good for Judge Kagan.
In the Senate Confirmation Hearing, Judge Elena Kagan has far surpassed both Alito and Roberts, who were unable to defend their decision making with anything other than stare decisis, over and over and over again; then, after appointed, didn’t follow stare decisis at all.
Judge Kagan’s answers are far superior to either Alito or Roberts. It is too bad Roberts will end up being Kagan’s superior; IMHO Roberts doesn’t deserve the position.
Report this