|
|
May 25, 2013
|
|
Japan’s Ordeal Is ‘Worst Since WWII’Posted on Mar 13, 2011
Japan’s prime minister, surveying the incredible damage inflicted by a massive earthquake and tidal wave and a still-unfolding nuclear disaster, said the country is facing its gravest crisis since World War II. The confirmed death toll neared 1,600 on Sunday, but many thousands of others remain missing in the disaster zone. —JCL
Advertisement New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By C.Curtis.Dillon, March 15, 2011 at 3:57 am Link to this comment
dolphiii:
I am an expert. I worked at Los Alamos for several years in the uranium isotope group. I’m reasonably familiar with how those machines work. So my histrionics is well placed. As events have shown, those reactors are still dangerous and failing. One has a containment breach and the other two need continuous seawater flushing to keep them from doing the same thing. Radiation levels around the plant are rising and already dangerous. And yet, despite your attempt to whitewash what’s happening, the reactors are still dangerous 3 days after they were shut down. 3 days! No other power plant system is dangerous 3 days after it’s been shut down. And the spent fuel is also dangerous, years after it’s no longer able to generate electricity. The fire in reactor number 4 was probably spent fuel which had become uncovered due to pump failures or even a leak in their spent fuel pond. Your unqualified support for nuclear energy tells me you have no idea what’s going on there. I, unfortunately, do and am deeply concerned.
Report thisBy jeandavid, March 14, 2011 at 5:45 pm Link to this comment
You hope we learn our lesson. This time? Why should it be any different from Three Mile Island, from which we learned nothing. Why should it be any different from Chernobyl, from which we learned nothing. If he has eyes, let him see, but he is blind. If he has ears, let him hear, but he is deaf. We are all going to die, from lack of food, lack of water, lack of air; we will fight wars to the death to obtain these things, but it will not work.
Report thisBy gerard, March 14, 2011 at 4:45 pm Link to this comment
The situation in Japan is doubly pitiable, I think. First the US invented “nuclear
energy” in the form of bombs. They dropped 2 on Japan, ostensibly to"end the
war” (as if the war could not be ended by simply stopping it) and next to “see
what would happen to real cities, not just wipe out Pacific islands with “only a
few people.”
Those two bombs obliterated Hiroshima and Nagasaki and sent the rest of Jaan
halfway to hell. No apologies, of course. Then after the war US not only
continues developing nuclear weapons (along with Russia, distributing them
throughout the world) but also sold Japan (and other countries) on nuclear
energy because Japan (having no coal or oil, and little “empty” land except
mountains} was totally dependent on US for oil and wanted to become
independent.
If there was any justice in the forces of physics, the tsunami would have hit the
U.S. coast somewhere and wiped out 10 or 20 thousand people, swamped our
houses and disabled your electric grid and mine.
Since there is no justice in the forces of physics, it is necessary that human
beings guard and develop their own unique appreciation of the meaning of
fairness and get rid of the “me first” ethic that permeates America.
Japan has built one of the world’s best public transportation systems, almost
totally dependent upon electricity to keep the country (relatively densely
populated and “modernized”) up and running day after day.
Developing geothermal from now on might be a better solution because of the
Report thisvolcanic nature of the country. No doubt that has its dangers, too. Looks like
worldwide conservation and shared distribution is going to be a necessity.
By gerard, March 14, 2011 at 4:45 pm Link to this comment
The situation in Japan is doubly pitiable, I think. First the US invented “nuclear
energy” in the form of bombs. They dropped 2 on Japan, ostensibly to"end the
war” (as if the war could not be ended by simply stopping it) and next to “see
what would happen to real cities, not just wipe out Pacific islands with “only a
few people.”
Those two bombs obliterated Hiroshima and Nagasaki and sent the rest of Jaan
halfway to hell. No apologies, of course. Then after the war US not only
continues developing nuclear weapons (along with Russia, distributing them
throughout the world) but also sold Japan (and other countries) on nuclear
energy because Japan (having no coal or oil, and little “empty” land except
mountains} was totally dependent on US for oil and wanted to become
independent.
If there was any justice in the forces of physics, the tsunami would have hit the
U.S. coast somewhere and wiped out 10 or 20 thousand people, swamped our
houses and disabled your electric grid and mine.
Since there is no justice in the forces of physics, it is necessary that human
beings guard and develop their own unique appreciation of the meaning of
fairness and get rid of the “me first” ethic that permeates America.
Japan has built one of the world’s best public transportation systems, almost
totally dependent upon electricity to keep the country (relatively densely
populated and “modernized”) up and running day after day.
Developing geothermal from now on might be a better solution because of the
Report thisvolcanic nature of the country. No doubt that has its dangers, too. Looks like
worldwide conservation and shared distribution is going to be a necessity.
By AnnaCatherine, March 14, 2011 at 10:52 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
If there’s an upside to this nightmare in Japan it could be the need to put an end to all nuclear programs. Russia and the U.S. spent incomprehensible amounts of money during what was called the Cold War. Each had the ability to destroy the other. Problem was, that in launching an attack, the retaliation was set off. That’s what prevented an attack from either side. What always troubled me over the years was the possibility of an accident. For that reason I’ve always been opposed to nuclear weapons of any kind. The Japanese people are paying dearly so the rest of the world can learn a lesson. This can happen anywhere.
Report thisBy dophiniii, March 14, 2011 at 10:18 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
I love how everyone is so quick to jump on the anit-nuke bandwagon and declare the situation in Japan as a ‘DISASTER’... what disaster??? If you believe the news media and their so called experts that fan the flames of sensationalism then I guess you can run for the hills… but the real disasters are still the damage done elsewhere by the quake and the tsunami…
Report thisNo matter what… nothing is safe from an event of this magnatude…if there had been an oil fired plant at that location you would have tens of thousands of gallons of oil contaminating the groundwater and everything else around the area…a gas fired plant would have had a REAL explosion and if you have ever seen the devastation done to East Ohio by just one tank farm, in which 600 people lost their lives, you begin to see that other forms of energy are less safe…
So far the max radiation levels seen were 155 millirem/hour and that was on site and that dropped to 4.4 millirem/hr within 24 hours… this due to the fact that the majority of the ‘DEADLY’ radioactive nuclides decay off very quickly… as far as the gas being released.. I haven’t seen the numbers but know from experience that given a distance of just a quarter of a mile the concentration would be so diluted due to natural dispersion, that it would be undetectable…
All of the personnel working at the plants are being monitored continuously as to their internal and external exposures and are working within the established limits for reponse to a situation like this.
These plants are designed to contain events such as these without exposing the public to levels above the governments limits for non-nuclear workers…they are given pressure tests on a regular basis to prove the ability of the containmet to not release any appreciable amount of contamination…
I could go on but please don’t believe what you are hearing on TV and Radio from the so called experts…they are so clueless as to be laughable at times…when all is said and done I am sure you will find the truth of the story will be very boring to read indeed…
Thanx
By C.Curtis.Dillon, March 14, 2011 at 7:47 am Link to this comment
Any source of power that requires an active and continuous source of electricity to keep it under control is inherently dangerous. Nuclear power is deadly for this very reason. Some will argue that these ‘old’ plants should be replaced by a newer, safer design but that is a lie. The basic weakness is still there. No amount of backup can overcome the simple truth that these plants need to always have power on and working. As we see in Japan, the earthquake did it’s damage and then the tsunami finished them off. They are now failing, one after another as the damaged backup systems fail. And the Japanese will once again pay the terrible price of a nuclear catastrophe. When will we learn?
Report thisBy Atlanta Roofing, March 13, 2011 at 10:48 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
No matter how one feels about nuclear energy, there are
Report thismany, many people working to avert this disaster, and
putting themselves at an awful risk in the process.
Nuclear energy is not safe. Sure if everything goes
according to plan running a nuclear power plant is
safe, but once the plan deviates the potential for
disaster grows rapidly. This does not even begin to
touch on the issue of the level of danger associated
with the waste these plants produce.