Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
June 18, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     nsa     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

The Terror Con

The FBI May Have Finally Found Jimmy Hoffa

Say Hello to the 'Super Rich'

This Will Not End Well

The Making of a Global Security State

Most Comments
Most Emailed

 * NEW! * The Making of a Global Security State
 * NEW! * Climate Change Puts Lake Life at Risk
 * NEW! * The Terror Con



The Unwinding


Truthdig Bazaar
Now They Tell Us

Now They Tell Us

By Orville Schell, Michael Massing
$9.95

more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Iran Claims It Captured U.S. Drone

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Dec 8, 2011
bbc.co.uk

Iranian state television broadcast this image of what it claimed was a U.S. drone captured by a special electronics unit in Iran’s military.

Well, this is awkward. Iran’s state-run Press TV reported Thursday that a special Revolutionary Guard “electronic warfare unit” had gained remote control of a U.S. drone and landed it after it had flown more than 100 miles into Iranian airspace. Meanwhile, U.S. officials claimed that the stealth aircraft was on a mission in Afghanistan when it went astray, but The New York Times ran a slightly different story about the drone’s mission.  —KA

BBC:

Pentagon officials have said they are concerned about Iran possibly acquiring information about the technology.

Iranian media said on Thursday that the foreign ministry had summoned the Swiss envoy to express its “strongest protest over the invasion of a US spy drone deep into its airspace”.

[...] A report in The New York Times on Thursday said the “stealth” drone had been part of a US surveillance programme mapping Iran’s suspected nuclear sites.

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By Don Henshaw, December 10, 2011 at 6:25 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Just another act of war against the Iranian state. They’re showing marvellous restraint in all of this but one has to wonder when their patience will end.

Report this

By diamond, December 10, 2011 at 2:32 pm Link to this comment

“lucky you didn’t get slammed by an ad hominem browbeating from Heterochromatic on the so-called ‘right’ or Diamond on the so-called ‘left’”

Oooooh yeah. Lucky. Real lucky. If people write fact-free, idiotic nonsense they should get slammed and Heterochromatic never met a fact he didn’t hate on sight. He spins so much he can’t walk straight. I only point out his misinformation. A lousy job, but someone’s got to do it.

Newt Gingrich is similarly lost in a fantasy world of his own creation:

Gingrich was a fan of Revolution in Military Affairs and rapid dominance and he fantasized about the technological future of drones and robots with the intellectual brilliance he has so often displayed.

‘Virtually every soldier in combat in 2010 will have somewhere on their body a person telephone linked by satellite to a world telephone network’ he said in a speech before he abruptly resigned in 1999. ‘That telephone will probably be a…personal communication system that will also have a computer compatibility, faxing capability so during lulls they can arrange a date’ (from ‘Private Warriors’, Ken Silverstein).

Since Gingrich is now married to his sixth wife, his interest in arranging a date, even on a battlefield, is only logical.

Report this
blogdog's avatar

By blogdog, December 10, 2011 at 1:41 pm Link to this comment

RE: ...condescending assumptions…

wow, that’s some thin skin - please accept my sincere apology if I offended you,
Ambill94 - maybe you’re new to the blogoshpere at large - if so, you’ll soon learn
the any reply that opens with “forgive…” as genuine, not passive aggressive, is
rare indeed - and trust me, it was genuine, as is the this apology

lucky you didn’t get slammed by an ad hominem browbeating from
Heterochromatic on the so-called ‘right’ or Diamond on the so-called ‘left’

Report this

By Ambill94, December 10, 2011 at 12:39 pm Link to this comment

Its clear that some of you have this blog totally under control. Electronic discussion is an open forum, which means that hopefully more and more people will come by to join the conversation and add their perspective to dialog.

To make condescending assumptions about what people who stop by here know or don’t know is not the way to build a blog. If I had known this was a private “room” where only the elite get to posture I would not have bothered.

Good luck to truthdig if all their threads are inhabited by the same overbearing nonsense.

Report this
PatrickHenry's avatar

By PatrickHenry, December 10, 2011 at 11:15 am Link to this comment

Shame, we could have built a much needed school somewhere in America for what this thing cost.

Report this
blogdog's avatar

By blogdog, December 10, 2011 at 10:58 am Link to this comment

RE: Perhaps, but failing to include much of the mainstream US media in this comment is
disingenuous.

forgive the assumption that everyone (at least in these blogs) knows we’re continually lied to by the
MSM

the point: so-called ‘alternative’ sources like Al Jazeera, Democracy Now, The Nation should be
equally scrutinized

as for Skunkworks latest ‘toy’, agreed, it’s firmware/chipset and propulsion system are far beyond
what one sees in the park on Sunday, nevertheless the difficulty of producing a workable nuclear
triggering system should not be dismissed

good point: if they really got one,  may not be wise to show it - question everything being reported
on this at this time - could be Iran has decided it needs to grind out some agitprop of its own to
counter that coming out of NATO Intelligence

Report this

By red diaper, December 10, 2011 at 10:42 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

“exploit the technology”? Maybe, maybe not, but is selling the bird to Russia, for example, “exploitation”? Duh! And in exchange? Also duh!

But both ideas miss the point. You don’t have to duplicate the gizmo, you have only to learn how to 1) conceal thing from it, 2) deceive it, and 3) how to destroy it.

Seems like the fellas might be well along in all three ways… they chose not to destroy when they obviously could have done so. So why put it on TV?

Remember what happened when the US thought that F117 pieces were in the Belgrade Chinese embassy?

Report this
oddsox's avatar

By oddsox, December 10, 2011 at 8:36 am Link to this comment

correction:
Fox News coming to party just hours ago.

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2011/12/09/images-iranian-nuclear-facility-provide-intel-into-recent-explosion/

forgive the Outrageous ripoff & EmileZ inspiration:
for the “nay-sayers”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gp5JCrSXkJY

Report this

By tapxe, December 9, 2011 at 9:06 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

make a deal with the Russians and Chinese…

all the access you want to this thing…

for ss300 missiles and more…

like EMP weapons to eliminate 80% of ameriKa with one bomb?

Wait for the attack and then you have the right to counterattack and wipe them (and another little bugger not far from you) off the face of the earth.

Then we shall finally enter the age of Aquarius.

Report this

By Maani, December 9, 2011 at 8:57 pm Link to this comment

Hmmm…wasn’t the shoot-down of Gary Powers; U-2 spy plane the incident that led, ultimately and inexorably, to the Cuban missile crisis?

Also, this is not the first time - this year - that a foreign country got its hands on “stealth” technology: are you forgetting that a few strategic pieces of the stealth helicopter were left behind after the alleged Bin Laden raid?

Hmmm…

Report this
IMax's avatar

By IMax, December 9, 2011 at 8:30 pm Link to this comment

blogdog,

You may be misunderstanding this situation.

- If reports are correct the drone Iran claims to have downed, the RQ-170 Sentinel, is a highly sophisticated piece (far from a simple toy). Several components of the Sentinel are manufactured by a single manufacturer with billion dollar facilities and capabilities beyond the grasp to all but a handful of Nation States. It would likely take Iran decades to duplicate the materials and technology. - China, on the other had, is different matter altogether.

- A crude nuclear devise can be constructed by nearly any nation. The devise is not the hard part. Its obtaining or manufacturing the fissile material.

With no obvious signs of a gaping hole in the drone, with no signs of an uncontrolled (crash) landing, it seems unlikely that Iran shot this vehicle down. According to U.S. sources the operator was able to set the vehicle down in a controlled manner.

It seems nun-too-bright for Iran to show this vehicle on State TV after claiming a shoot-down.

Report this

By Ambill94, December 9, 2011 at 5:52 pm Link to this comment

blogdog,

a couple of observations:

“...indeed: we’re told repeatedly of Iran’s ‘nuclear capability’, but now that they can’t figure out how to fly toy airplanes…”

Correct, we are told these things by OUR military/state department etc. using information from various “intelligence” agencies.

“...contradictions like this are expected from globalist
deflective source disinformation organs like Al Jazeera…”

Perhaps, but failing to include much of the mainstream US media in this comment is disingenuous.

Report this
blogdog's avatar

By blogdog, December 9, 2011 at 4:57 pm Link to this comment

RE: ...United States had doubts “the Iranians have the expertise” to exploit the
technology…
- Well, this is awkward.

indeed: we’re told repeatedly of Iran’s ‘nuclear capability’, but now that they can’t
figure out how to fly toy airplanes

contradictions like this are expected from globalist
deflective source disinformation organs like Al Jazeera

Report this

By Ambill94, December 9, 2011 at 4:10 pm Link to this comment

From aljazeera.net http://www.aljazeera.com/news/middleeast/2011/12/201112818188328743.html

Above is the aljazeera article on the capture of the RQ-170 drone. I found the following line in the article amusing to say the least: “But a US official, who declined to be named, said on Wednesday that the United States had doubts “the Iranians have the expertise” to exploit the technology found in the wrecked vehicle.”

First of all, though we can’t see the landing gear, the body does not look like a “wrecked vehicle”.

Secondly, the statement by that “US official” is amazing. Are we supposed to believe that Iranians do not have sophisticated electronics/computer expertise enough to “exploit the technology”...hmmmm

Report this
IMax's avatar

By IMax, December 9, 2011 at 2:17 pm Link to this comment

gerard,

In your zealousness you misread or misunderstood my question.

Report this

By red diaper, December 9, 2011 at 2:04 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Never mind the past - what now? Well, when the Chinese got a F117 in the yugo business their embassy, where maybe it was, blew up. Funny, eh? Not really. It’s ordinary as a dead cat - all military equipment that gets captured is a target - like duh! Of course the Iranians aren’t stupid…and of course - ah well, I’ll leave that for you to finish… So let’s just say that something that looks like the RQ170 is going to be on a flatbed truck headed for the Russian border or to a seaport and - s’prize! Bang! But this will be a trap… We’re all so screwed…

Report this

By Ambill94, December 9, 2011 at 1:16 pm Link to this comment

When I first heard about this I thought that the “capture” was allowed to happen…fuel for more misplaced aggression toward Iran…like the proof that we knew of an Iranian plot to assassinate the ambassador from Saudi Arabia or wherever?

One way or another we seem hell-bent on creating whatever evidence we can to justify military action. I hope the people that are not brain dead in this country are contacting their reps and the WH about NO WAR WITH IRAN, or anyone else for that matter.

Report this

By gerard, December 9, 2011 at 10:58 am Link to this comment

IMax, you can’t be serious?  Most other nations of the world are entirely incapable of the amount of domination and deadly military threat projected every day by the United States of America. The overwhelming power of our military is a danger even to ourselves because it not only kills our children along with other peoples’ but it bleeds the “lower classes” for endless funding of increasinglly dangerous “war toys”, at the same time scaring them into compliance.
  Those other countries you mention who are also threatening, buy their stuff from us, which is how Wall Street gets so rich. Didn’t we learn last week that people in the Middle East are being pepper-sprayed with stuff made in Jamestown, Pa.? why is that?  Now Iran apparently has a drone to copy, courtesy of US stupidity.
  I don’t want to admit what I see, either, but—it’s there “right in front of God and everybody” as we used to say years ago!

Report this
Oceanna's avatar

By Oceanna, December 9, 2011 at 10:09 am Link to this comment

I agree with litlepeep that Americans are sick and tired of the war-mongering of
the last 10 years, and a significant number are smart enough (I hope) to see
that the enormous expenses are significantly crushing the economy. 

Obama’s pandering to the lowest common denominator (those engorged hawks
wobbling on the ground) may come back to bite him, along with his undeniable
and consistent tendency to say one thing and do another in domestic matters.
Just this week he boasted of killing al-Awlaki and bin Laden along with the
effectiveness of his Done campaigns and Libyan intervention.

But wait a minute, of course, those aren’t acts of war!  At least, not with the
administration spinmeisters and the DoJ, who have taken the logic of Lewis
Carrol’s Humpty Dumpty to new levels of the lowly.  And boy have they
shattered the Constitution along with the Geneva Conventions!

Report this

By Jim Michie, December 9, 2011 at 5:45 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Waddya mean “Claims”?  They have the damn thing, so please quit parroting the propaganda that the arrogant military-intelligence (an oxymoron)-security-industrial-complex continues to spoon feed you!

Report this
thecrow's avatar

By thecrow, December 9, 2011 at 5:34 am Link to this comment

It’s intact. It didn’t crash. It was landed.

http://michaelfury.wordpress.com/2011/06/02/maximum-visibility/

Report this

By Fearless, December 9, 2011 at 12:16 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

It’s highly probable that pilot Nintendo toggled it into Iran per orders from above.

Investors in the Iran war are desperate to sell their product.

Too bad more Americans are waking up everyday and realizing the plain truth that war is the most vile and disgusting thing imaginable.

Report this

By litlpeep, December 8, 2011 at 10:10 pm Link to this comment

I suppose the good news is that US foreign military blundering, which has steadily gotten worse, war-after-undeclared war, since 1945, is finally becoming a topic in the US.

Until this year, all that growing and increasingly expensive and increasingly inept war-mongering has been totally chamber-of-commerce-boosterism-puritanical-taboo-to-question.

This election year is already proving to be a very long and increasingly ugly mess.  Indeed, why should we even count upon having an election?  What if it proves inconvenient for certain people who happen to control the puppets nominally in power?

Report this

By litlpeep, December 8, 2011 at 10:03 pm Link to this comment

It is hardly news that Commanders in Chief who very much need boosts in popularity (today’s polls) will turn to foreign military adventurism to get that boost.

This is why the first US Commander in Chief warned us against tolerating such foreign military adventurism.

The puzzle is why do we American voters continue rewarding these half-witted Commanders-in-Chief with re-election?

Report this
Blueokie's avatar

By Blueokie, December 8, 2011 at 9:36 pm Link to this comment

Like all wars, undeclared ones also have unintended consequences.  This will at least break the Empire’s monopoly on drones.  Obamanation’s timing proves impeccable once again, wonder if he’d like a do-over on his saber rattling with China.

Newsmaxx, your naivete is priceless.

Report this
IMax's avatar

By IMax, December 8, 2011 at 8:55 pm Link to this comment

race_to_the_bottom,

I’m curious. How do you conclude the to be U.S. uniquely corrupt? I see the same behaviors by all people and all nations.

Report this
Robespierre115's avatar

By Robespierre115, December 8, 2011 at 7:55 pm Link to this comment

Will be funny to see how Obamabots justify voting for “the lesser of two evils” (instead of for an independent) IF Israel attacks Iran and Obama does exactly what Bush, Romney or Gingrich would do, support the strike and join in.

Report this
race_to_the_bottom's avatar

By race_to_the_bottom, December 8, 2011 at 6:34 pm Link to this comment

To people in the US, this is just “normal” behavior for the US. To talk openly of attacking or invading other counties is just “normal” in the US.In most countries, and in international law, this simply is not acceptable and is a crime.  USians don’t even know that the US is the true rogue nation of the world and violates international law daily.

Report this
blogdog's avatar

By blogdog, December 8, 2011 at 4:48 pm Link to this comment

of course this is nothing new, except for the angle of loosing a state-of-the-art
espionage unit… high points in the US/IRAN espionage history:

1. CIA and MOSSAD target Iran’s nuclear facilities with the Stuxnet computer worm
2. CIA, for over 5 years now, runs terrorists into Iran from Baluchistan
3. CIA, for over 5 years now,  supports PKK rebels on Iran’s eastern boarder
4. CIA operatives supported and incited Green Revolution actions 18 months ago
5. US supported and prompted Iraq to invade Iran in 1980, resulting 8-years of
bloody war, in the middle of which the US shot down an Iranian civilian airliner
6. After the Islamic Revolution, Brzezinski tried to enlist the Mullas in his Grand
Chessboard Arc of Crisis plan against the USSR - fell apart when US took in the
Shaw for medical treatment, resulting in Embassy hostage taking - Iran called the
US Embassy a ‘nest of spies’
7. CIA/MI6 instigated the coup against the democratically elected Mossadek and
reinstated the Shaw

tell the truth: anyone think that ‘nest of spies’ assessment was wrong?

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.