|
|
May 18, 2013
|
|
Investigators and Activists Target Keystone XL PipelinePosted on Nov 7, 2011
Friday, just two days before thousands of protesters encircled the White House, the State Department inspector general’s office said it would launch an investigation into the vetting process for a controversial oil pipeline that would snake its way from Canada to the Gulf Coast. Among various objections to the deal: » One of the main lobbyists for the pipeline just so happens to have been a senior staffer on Hillary Clinton’s 2008 presidential campaign. » The developer was allowed to choose which company did the environmental review of the project, and it just so happened to choose one of its frequent clients. » Contrary to the review, protesters say the pipeline could endanger environmentally sensitive areas and drinking water. They also object to the project as a doubling down on dirty energy at a time when the president has failed to deliver much hope for the climate crisis. More from The New York Times:
—PZS Advertisement New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By Oceanna, November 8, 2011 at 8:00 am Link to this comment
So the State Department is investigating its own conflict of interest?
“Of course, this isn’t another conflict of interest,” says the fox to the hens.
Report this“You’ve got it all wrong to think that you know.”
By thecrow, November 8, 2011 at 5:35 am Link to this comment
Protest this pipeline while you’re at it:
http://michaelfury.wordpress.com/2009/05/11/the-gas-must-flow/
Report thisBy Metrix, November 7, 2011 at 8:35 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
http://dirtyoilsands.org/files/OCIKeystoneXLExport-Fin.pdf
The site noted above explains that the Keystone XL pipeline will deliver oil that is primarily intended for export—not domestic use.
Much of the debate and coverage of the Keystone XL pipeline tends to overlook this aspect of the problem, namely that we would incur most of the environmental liabilities of the project, but little or none of the oil.
The export factor should also raise serious national security questions about how can we afford to expedite the depletion and export of whatever strategic oil reserves this continent does possess in this era of post-peak oil and oil wars.
Report thisBy ardee, November 7, 2011 at 7:12 pm Link to this comment
Thank you President Obama for proving, yet again, that you are an unfit leader and a shill for your corporate masters.
Report this