LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman. Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
May 19, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     elizabeth warren     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

Truthdigger of the Week: Sen. Angus King

Letter From Birmingham Jail

'SNL': Stefon's Farewell Features Anderson Cooper

The Lotto Symbolizes the False Promises of Barracuda Capitalism

Chilling: Arctic Tundra ‘Will Turn to Forest’

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Act of Congress
Daily Rituals
The Girls of Atomic City

Digs

Truthdig Bazaar
The Beginner’s Goodbye

The Beginner’s Goodbye

By Anne Tyler
$15.94

One State, Two States

One State, Two States

By Benny Morris
$17.16

more items

 
Ear to the Ground

If Santorum Were President

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Sep 23, 2011
Flickr / Gage Skidmore

In a marvelous display of self-contradiction at the Republican debate Thursday night, Rick Santorum argued against both sex in the military and any “social policy” that determines how sex is treated in the military.

According to Santorum, the repeal of “don’t ask, don’t tell” counts as a “special privilege” to gay and lesbian soldiers. In other words, the rejection of a policy that forces homosexual servicemen and women to conceal part of their identity is a luxury they don’t deserve, as well as a threat to the tightly woven social fabric of the American military establishment.

So, if Santorum is elected, who will be the first to volunteer for abstinence? Newly minted Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta? Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mike Mullen? Mr. Santorum, the commander in chief himself?

See his remarks and boos from the audience for a gay soldier below. —ARK

The Huffington Post:

SANTORUM: I would say any type of sexual activity has absolutely no place in the military. The fact they are making a point to include it as a provision within the military that we are going to recognize a group of people and give them a special privilege to, and removing don’t ask don’t tell. I think tries to inject social policy into the military. And the military’s job is to do one thing: to defend our country…

KELLY: What would you do with soldiers like Stephen Hill?

SANTORUM: What we are doing is playing social experimentation with our military right now. That’s tragic. I would just say that going forward we would reinstitute that policy if Rick Santorum was president. That policy would be re-instituted as far as people in, I would not throw them out because that would be unfair to them because of the policy of this administration. But we would move forward in conformity with what was happening in the past. Which was- sex is not an issue. It should not be an issue. Leave it alone. Keep it to yourself whether you are heterosexual or homosexual.

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By Gilbert Cantlin, September 25, 2011 at 6:28 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

It is unbelievable that Rick Santorum was ever elected to any public office much
less made it to this Republican presidential primary marathon.  He embarrasses
himself and his party, to say nothing of Pennsylvania voters who ever checked
off his name on a ballot in the past.  He’s as illiterate as our electorate in
general, that’s the only explanation, but that’s true of almost every wannabe in
this Republican presidential primary.  Santorum knows nothing more about
human sexuality than to pursue his own urges.  Yet, he thinks others should
not do that!  He’s biologically ignorant, pretending that there isn’t just as much
sex going on in the military as in any other category of humankind.  Does he
pretend to have only made all his babies for God or did his own seeking and
satisfaction of pleasure have something to do with it?  Santorum is also messed
up regarding our government.  The president’s only constitutional role in
making laws is proposing and accepting or rejecting.  Other than that, it is his
obligation only to enforce the bills presented to him by the legislature and
accepted with his signature.  Someone should remind Santorum that he is
seeking the presidency of the United States, not the kingship of a kingdom. 
Our president is the executor of laws passed by the legislature that have been
accepted with his signature.  He is not to be king-in-chief!

Report this

By Inherit The Wind, September 25, 2011 at 5:32 am Link to this comment

Does anyone think Santorum has a snowball’s chance in Hell?  If so they are full of “santorum”!

So why waste bandwidth on him?  If Michelle Bachmann was a lot stupider, a down-right idiot, and an ugly man, she’d be Rick Santorum.

Report this

By Jimnp72, September 25, 2011 at 5:25 am Link to this comment

He has always been a total moron. that is why he was so popular here in Pa.

Report this

By John Poole, September 24, 2011 at 6:07 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I remember being clearly annoyed that gays could have a sexual roommate while I
was in a dorm at USC but I was not allowed to have a girlfriend be with me, It was
same sex dorms of course but I was at a disadvantage. Lesbians could room with
their sex partner as could gay males. It just didn’t seem right. I had to have any
trysts under the steps leading to the music room at 11 pm at night with randy
females. Wouldn’t this also apply to military duty?

Report this

By Marian Griffith, September 24, 2011 at 3:11 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

@Lillith
—-What an idiot, DADT only applies to one group of people, NOT everyone, especially not to heterosexuals. AND heterosexuals do not get kicked out for revealing that they are heterosexuals. DADT was a “special privilege” for homosexuals, just in a harmful rather than a positive way. AND the audience, moderator, and media so—-

Welcome to the wonderful world of ‘newspeak’ where peace means war, truth means lie and where special priveledge actually means a modern variant of a Jim Crow law.

I always thought the UK would be the first country to reach the state described by Orwell in 1984, but it seems that the USA is still leading the charge to the abyss.

Report this

By Marian Griffith, September 24, 2011 at 6:42 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

@gstoddard
—-We are a better people than this.—-

Sadly, we are not :(

Also Sanatorum, like most to the people who would vote for (the likes) him have an exceedingly narrow view of the world. It certainly must have escaped his mind that already large numbers of gay and lesbian men and women serve in the army today, and that other countries have long have a policy of not caring at all about who their soldiers would prefer to share a bed with without anybody being able to notice a difference.
But what can you expect from politicians and voters who are genuinely unable to comprehend that the world is bigger and vastly more diverse than their little suburb?

Report this

By gstoddard, September 23, 2011 at 8:20 pm Link to this comment

My previous post did not address the ignorance and bigotry demonstrated by Rick
Santorum when he stumbled through an answer that was unrelated to the issues
raised by DADT. I have heard some commentators report that he did well in this
debate. How can they ignore his outrageous willingness to deny equal rights to
any service member solely based on his or her sexual orientation?

Report this

By gstoddard, September 23, 2011 at 8:13 pm Link to this comment

Have the Republicans no decency? These are the same folks who are so quick to
go to war and who flaunt their patriotism shamelessly. None of those vying to lead
our nation dares criticize the audience members who boo a soldier stationed in
Iraq risking all in the defense of this nation. Disgusting.

And this is the third recent instance of such egregious meekness and cowardice by
all of these candidates. None objected when the audience applauded Governor
Perry’s record in executing prisoners or when audience members cheered the
prospect that an uninsured young man should be allowed to die because he chose
not to pay for insurance.

We are a better people than this.

Report this

By Lilith, September 23, 2011 at 7:50 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

What an idiot, DADT only applies to one group of people, NOT everyone, especially not to heterosexuals. AND heterosexuals do not get kicked out for revealing that they are heterosexuals. DADT was a “special privilege” for homosexuals, just in a harmful rather than a positive way. AND the audience, moderator, and media so far have bought the blatant fallacy. Now that is just depressing ......

Report this

By rend it, September 23, 2011 at 7:14 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

so if we took his argument to its extreme, there would be no women or people of color in the
general population?

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.