|
|||
|
House Rejects FCC’s Net Neutrality RulesPosted on Apr 9, 2011
With murmurs of a veto in the background, Republicans successfully pushed a measure through the U.S. House rejecting the FCC’s 2010 net neutrality rules for Internet service providers. A similar measure awaits action in the Senate, but the White House has indicated that President Obama would veto any such resolution. —JCL
Advertisement New and Improved CommentsWe are launching a major overhaul of our comments section. In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread. Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts. Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with. Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page. |
By diamond, April 10, 2011 at 4:35 pm Link to this comment
Obama will veto it. Much of his funding when he ran for president came from enthusiastic supporters of net neutrality. The more important question here is why do the Republicans want to shut down the internet? What have they got to hide? I think at least 73% of Americans know exactly what they’ve got to hide, now and into the future. They want to shut down the internet for the same reason they want to shut down Wikileaks: because the truth can only do them harm.
Report thisBy SteveL, April 9, 2011 at 11:11 pm Link to this comment
The government has main-slime-media totally under its thumb. The Internet is
Report thissomewhat out of control so something has to be done about that.
By Maani, April 9, 2011 at 10:08 pm Link to this comment
PBS, NPR, NEA, EPA, Planned Parenthood…now the FCC and net neutrality. Is there anything these extremist boneheads actually LIKE in this country? (Don’t answer that…LOL)
Report thisBy thethirdman, April 9, 2011 at 4:16 pm Link to this comment
Seems to me, I remember reading something on this very site, that the proposed
Report this“net neutrality” rules are anything but neutral. Can anyone help me out with this
one? I’ll repost if I can find it.
By TDoff, April 9, 2011 at 2:22 pm Link to this comment
It’s our own fault. The reason the House made this move is because The Boner’s p****d at all the remarks made on the ‘Net about his orange face, and how he always looks and sounds as though each morning he dips his head in a bucket of crap.
Report thisSo from now on, it’s gonna cost us a $100 bill each time we blog about s**t-face, unless…
our waffling, wavering President has the gonads to veto rejection of net neutrality.