|
|
June 19, 2013
|
|
History Frowns on Health Care ChallengesPosted on Mar 31, 2010
Historian Stanley Kutler puts the health care legal challenges by 14 state attorneys general in their proper historical context: The attorneys may be hoping for an assist from a radical and conservative Supreme Court, but such a decision would overturn centuries of law going back to John Marshall in 1821 and earlier.
Advertisement New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By Mike789, April 1, 2010 at 6:36 am Link to this comment
Is it not obvious that the effort to deny the insurance “mandate” on the grounds of constitutionality inherently establishes a mandate that those presently insured bear the cost of those without.
Healthcare, may not be a “right” but it is surely a necessity. Unlike a utility you cannot simply turn off the juice. The problems are still there. The stark immorality of the “Street” must not apply in a professed Christian society.
Higher premiums are thrown upon the insured, in part, to address the shortfall obtained by the uninsured. They are not voluntary. As such, a collective responsibility seems justified.
Report this