Top Leaderboard, Site wide
Left Masthead
May 30, 2016
Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines
Sign up for Truthdig's Email NewsletterLike Truthdig on FacebookFollow Truthdig on TwitterSubscribe to Truthdig's RSS Feed

Wildfire Fears Cool a Little

Truthdig Bazaar more items

Ear to the Ground
Print this item

Hillary Clinton Likes to Bomb People and That Could Be a Problem for Democrats in 2016

Posted on Jan 14, 2014

  Then-Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton speaks during a news conference at the Pentagon in 2010, as tell-all memoir author Robert M. Gates, right, and Adm. Mike Mullen look on. Photo by U.S. Navy/MC1 Chad J. McNeeley.

Iraq, Libya, Syria, Iran, Pakistan—there is a long list of countries where Hillary Clinton has championed the use of American military power. But the U.S. is rather sick of bullets and bombs and Clinton’s penchant for militarism, taken with her ties to high finance and more conservative wings of the Democratic Party, leave yet another opening on the left of the presumed presidential candidate.

Beyond the primary, Clinton would most likely face a Republican challenger unencumbered by George W. Bush’s war baggage. Of course we’ll have to wait and see.

Here’s Michael Crowley in Time via Political Wire:

As Secretary of State, Clinton backed a bold escalation of the Afghanistan war. She pressed Obama to arm the Syrian rebels, and later endorsed air strikes against the Assad regime. She backed intervention in Libya, and her State Department helped enable Obama’s expansion of lethal drone strikes. In fact, Clinton may have been the administration’s most reliable advocate for military action. On at least three crucial issues—Afghanistan, Libya, and the bin Laden raid—Clinton took a more aggressive line than Gates, a Bush-appointed Republican.

Former administration officials also tell TIME that Clinton was an advocate for maintaining a residual troop force after the U.S. withdrawal from Iraq—an issue of renewed interest given al Qaeda’s resurgence there. They also describe her as skeptical of diplomacy with Iran, and firmly opposed to talk of a “containment” policy that would be an alternative to military action should negotiations with Tehran fail.

—Posted by Peter Z. Scheer

More Below the Ad


Square, Site wide

New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

Right 1, Site wide - BlogAds Premium
Right 2, Site wide - Blogads
Right Skyscraper, Site Wide
Right Internal Skyscraper, Site wide
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Like Truthdig on Facebook