|
|||
|
Here Comes the Capital StrikePosted on Nov 26, 2011
From his seat in Congress, House Speaker John Boehner announced in mid-September that American business owners would continue to hold the nation’s wealth (and thus the public welfare) hostage until government granted them the “low-tax, deregulated world they wanted,” writes journalist and author Thomas Frank in Harper’s online. Yes, in response to the murmurings of an ungrateful working class, our brave captains of industry have gone on strike. The whims of prevailing economic power, not a concern for the common good, should determine the amount of comfort, security and protection allotted to common Americans. In reviewing the ruling class’ attempts to wage “capital strikes” during the New Deal era, Frank makes it clear—as Truthdig’s own Chris Hedges so often has—that the current imbalance of wealth in America makes political blackmail possible again. For the time being, there is no way to vote against the interests of the 1 percent. —ARK
Advertisement Previous item: L.A. Mayor Gives Occupiers an Eviction Notice Next item: Pentagon Spends Millions Protecting Uzbekistan Dictator New and Improved CommentsWe are launching a major overhaul of our comments section. In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread. Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts. Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with. Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page. |
By texanarch, November 28, 2011 at 11:20 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
A Capital strike? These guys act as if they are literally bullet proof. I suspect that they are not. The choices for the oppressed are being reduced daily. I am afraid that it will require violence and pain inflicted upon the 1% before any real change will occur.
Report thisSome of us have nothing left to lose.
By moonraven, November 28, 2011 at 2:49 am Link to this comment
Gerard:
Since I am not together with you guys in Gringolandia, you may wish to reconsider speaking on my behalf.
I will be sucking it up with a whole different group of folks—none of whom is white.
Report thisBy mrfreeze, November 27, 2011 at 9:57 pm Link to this comment
OzarkMichael - Your comment: “People with money are afraid to invest it in the US economy. Uncertainty about the cost of hiring employees (including mandated future health care costs) and more importantly a great uncertainty about economic prospects are keeping folks from starting business or investing in them.”
Did you just copy and paste that from the Heritage Foundation website???? I thought all the top CEO’s and financial experts were getting paid THE BIG BUCKS to “manage” uncertainty and risk. Seems to me their self-appointed “compensation committees” should be reevaluating their job performance. I thought it was American ingenuity and creativity (supposedly coming from all our well-paid corporate board-rooms) that fuels our “exceptionalism.” Where’s all the “talent and genius” that corporate leaders brag about?
As for why employees are not being hired, please, give the health-care issue a rest would ya? There is NOTHING that forces businesses large or small to cover their employees with health insurance. In fact, since there are more employees out there for the jobs available, it wouldn’t be a problem to simply drop employee coverage. If employees don’t like it they can quit….there are plenty of others out there to fill their shoes…..right? After all, it’s just the economic mess we’re in,” right???
I guess my problem with your whole argument is that “businesses and business owners” inhabit a more ethereal dimension or something. I’m all for busting up a lot of large corporations (most of which are monopolies…the banks, the retailers, the phone companies, the Media….). Retaliation should take the form of HUGE governmental regulation and enforcement….
Report thisBy gerard, November 27, 2011 at 2:55 pm Link to this comment
Moonraven: As one human being to another, looks like we’ll all have to suck it up together, somehow. Nobody is inside any magic circle anymore.
Report thisBy moonraven, November 27, 2011 at 8:07 am Link to this comment
Gerard: National death wish—based on denial o guilt for genocide committed against indigenous folks. You become what you deny.
Suck it up.
Report thisBy diamond, November 26, 2011 at 11:22 pm Link to this comment
Bonehead strikes again! Anyone with a worse case of foot in mouth disease I’ve yet to see in public life - unless it’s Dick Cheney. But Dickhead is now semi-retired and has no pulse, so his outbursts of candor will be of much shorter duration than Bonehead’s.
Report thisBy Outraged, November 26, 2011 at 9:14 pm Link to this comment
Re: OzarkMichael
Your comment: “Screaming for retribution against
the people who arent investing isnt going to help.”
While its anyone’s guess as to whether you are this
stupid or you think everyone else is, for the record:
People ARE NOT asking for retribution because some
Report thisaren’t investing, they are asking for retribution
because of the crime spree wall street and the
banksters indulged in which then CRASHED the economy for which they then received bailouts and bonuses in spite of their ineptitude and criminality AND NOTHING HAS BEEN DONE ABOUT IT.
By gerard, November 26, 2011 at 8:25 pm Link to this comment
Find out how Denmark does it. Investigate the workings of Sweden, Norway, Holland. Learn more about the inter-connected sense of responsibility in Japan. Are we just stupid, or what is our excuse? Lack of empathy? Loss of belief in democracy? Loss of self-confidence? Surveilled into silence? National death wish?
Report thisBy rumblingspire, November 26, 2011 at 6:06 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
theoretically, john galt has the character that would never ever take a bailout. ayn rand would have condemned the crooks that run todays economy. she spoke against gangsters.
Report thisBy OzarkMichael, November 26, 2011 at 5:47 pm Link to this comment
People with money are afraid to invest it in the US economy. Uncertainty about the cost of hiring employees (including mandated future health care costs) and more importantly a great uncertainty about economic prospects are keeping folks from starting business or investing in them.
It isnt a plot, it isnt an evil intention. Its just the econonomic mess we are in. Screaming for retribution against the people who arent investing isnt going to help.
Report thisBy greg_2, November 26, 2011 at 4:58 pm Link to this comment
Tax collectors don’t go to Heaven, that is why the Christian Conservatives do not want to raise taxes.
Report thisBy oregoncharles, November 26, 2011 at 12:22 pm Link to this comment
“For the time being, there is no way to vote against the interests of the 1 percent. —ARK”
That’s a flagrant lie. You certainly can’t do it by voting for Democrats, since they’ve long since sold their party to the 1%. But you do have an alternative: the Green Party, http://www.gp.org.
Report thisBy Rodney, November 26, 2011 at 9:56 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
They own him as they do much of congress.The United
Report thisStates of Corporate America!