LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
2010 Webby Award Winner for Best Political Blog
 
May 26, 2012
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     gay marriage     barack obama     ndaa     robert scheer     chris hedges
Most Read

TED: 'A Money-Soaked Orgy of Self-Congratulatory Futurism'

Russia and Exxon Mobil Sign Arctic Oil Deal

Truthdiggers of the Week: 400,000 Canadians Launching the ‘Maple Spring’

I Can't Hear Myself Think

A Rare Admission That Money Trumps Everything Else

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
Why Bain Questions Matter
OSHA Struggles When Tower Climbers Die

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Better Than We Found It
The Good-Natured Dictator

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101

Truthdig Bazaar
Human Smoke

Human Smoke

By Nicholson Baker
$19.80

more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Halliburton Blamed for Shoddy Construction in Gulf Oil Disaster

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   

Posted on Oct 28, 2010
U.S. Coast Guard

Fire boat response crews battle the blazing remnants of the offshore oil rig Deepwater Horizon.

Three of four tests showed that the cement mixture used by Halliburton in the construction of BP’s ill-fated oil well in the Gulf was unstable, but the mixture was used anyway, a presidential commission investigating the disaster has found. The only successful test, which BP did not know about, has since come under suspicion.

AP via Google:

The panel said that of four tests done in February and April by Halliburton, only one—the last—showed the mix would hold. But the results of that single successful test were not shared with BP, and may not have reached Halliburton, before the cement was pumped, according to a letter sent to commissioners Thursday by chief investigative counsel Fred H. Bartlit Jr.

BP had in hand at the time of the blowout the results of only one of the tests—a February analysis sent to BP by Halliburton in a March 8 e-mail that indicated the cement could fail. The slurry tested in that case was a slightly different blend, and assumed a slightly different well design, but there is no indication that Halliburton flagged the problem for BP, or that BP had concerns, the letter said.

[...] Independent tests conducted for the commission by Chevron on a nearly identical mixture were also released Thursday. The results concluded that the cement mix was unstable, raising questions about the validity of Halliburton’s final test.

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


New and Improved Comments

We are launching a major overhaul of our comments section.

In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread.

Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts.

Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with.

Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page.

By frecklefever, October 30, 2010 at 12:26 pm Link to this comment

UNTIL THE CHAIRMAN AND ITS BOARD IS PROSECUTED THE BEAT GOES
ON…CORPORATIONS CAN ALWAYS HIRE A STOOGE CEO TO DO THEIR
DIRTY WORK AND TAKE THE BLAME…BUY POLICY AND GOALS ARE SET BY
THE BOARDS…BUSH SAID WHEN LEAVING OFFICE HE WANTED TO MAKE
MONEY ON SPEAKING FEES AND SITTING ON BOARDS…SO HE KNOWS
WHERE THE RULERS OF GOLD LURK…ARE YOU LISTENING ERIC THE
HOLDER..?

Report this

By aacme88, October 30, 2010 at 3:21 am Link to this comment

Now, if Halliburton was just a general contractor building the strip center on the corner, and something like ignoring faulty concrete was discovered, BOOM! They’d lose their license just like that. I doubt anything like that will happen at their level though.
Just like the banks: if you’re gonna steal, or short the specs, do it in a BIG way.

Report this

By purplewolf, October 28, 2010 at 9:07 pm Link to this comment

Bet when all is said and done none of these companies will pay 1% of the total costs of their mess. It took over 20 years for the Exxon Valdez to pony up, only to have the S.C. dismiss the verdict and they ended up not having to pay for their mess after all, the very same day when Sarah Palin was ambushed by Katie Couric’s trick question about what she reads and naming any Supreme Court decisions and all she could come up with was Roe-v-Wade-the old GOP standby.

Yeah, we all know they might get a slap on the wrist and they will promise to do better in the future and the taxpayers will be the ones on the chopping block again.

Report this

By ardee, October 28, 2010 at 5:48 pm Link to this comment

While the three culprits in this case, Halliburton, TransOcean ( the builder of the rig and the two fail safe devices that failed to actually be safe) and BP are due their day in court I would also note that a fourth party needs mention here.

Our governmental agency charged with the regulatory and certification process must be added to the list of parties held responsible for this potential environmental disaster , the effects of which are as yet unknown and the far reaching consequences yet to be learned.

Far too often we see agencies headed by industry leaders whose concerns lie, not with public or worker safety, but with industry profitability. But we all know this, dont we?

Report this
Newsletter

Get Truthdig in your inbox


 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2012 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.