Top Leaderboard, Site wide
July 29, 2014
Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines
Help us grow by sharing
and liking Truthdig:
Sign up for Truthdig's Email NewsletterLike Truthdig on FacebookFollow Truthdig on TwitterSubscribe to Truthdig's RSS Feed

Newsletter

sign up to get updates






The Sixth Extinction
War of the Whales


Truthdig Bazaar
Iraq Confidential

Iraq Confidential

By Scott Ritter
$17.16


The Balloonist

By MacDonald Harris and Philip Pullman
$14.95

more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Groups Push to Make Doctors’ Performance Records Public Again

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Sep 16, 2011
Flickr / Tarter Time Photography (CC-BY-SA)

Journalism and patient advocacy organizations are fighting against a recent decision by the Obama administration to shut down public access to an online database of doctor malpractice and disciplinary records.

The National Practitioner Data Bank has long been a resource for journalists, researchers and patient advocates working to expose dangerous trends in medical practices. The database never identified physicians by name—that is prohibited by law—but enterprising researchers and journalists have been able to combine the information they gleaned there with other records to report on specific physicians.

The Health Resources and Services Administration seems to believe researchers’ ingenuity and resourcefulness in using the system was reason enough to shut down the once-public information, saying, “It is important to understand that the law that created the National Practitioner Data Bank requires that information about individual practitioners [doctors, nurses, etc.] must remain confidential.”

In effect the agency seems to be saying it’s OK for the public to know about malpractice in a general, fuzzy way, but not in any way that would be of use to an individual in making medical choices. —BF

Los Angeles Times:

Most recently, the Kansas City Star published a story on Sept. 4 about physicians with long histories of alleged malpractice who had not been disciplined by the Kansas or Missouri medical boards.

That prompted HRSA to threaten the reporter with a fine and take down the database.

“It is important to understand that the law that created the National Practitioner Data Bank requires that information about individual practitioners [doctors, nurses, etc.] must remain confidential,” said HRSA spokesman Martin Kramer.

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement

Square, Site wide

New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By ardee, September 18, 2011 at 6:50 am Link to this comment

Yet another in a long list of questionable actions by this administration that should make us all wonder at exactly for whom Obama works.

I expected to find a post or two from those who endlessly defend an administration and a President in desperate need of such defense.

I guess they will be content to hide from the light hoping we will all return to the darkness in which their position can flourish.

Report this
 
Right 1, Site wide - BlogAds Premium
 
Right 2, Site wide - Blogads
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
Right Skyscraper, Site Wide
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion   Publisher, Zuade Kaufman   Editor, Robert Scheer
© 2014 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.