LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
2010 Webby Award Winner for Best Political Blog
 
May 26, 2012
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     gay marriage     barack obama     ndaa     robert scheer     chris hedges
Most Read

TED: 'A Money-Soaked Orgy of Self-Congratulatory Futurism'

Russia and Exxon Mobil Sign Arctic Oil Deal

Truthdiggers of the Week: 400,000 Canadians Launching the ‘Maple Spring’

I Can't Hear Myself Think

A Rare Admission That Money Trumps Everything Else

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
Why Bain Questions Matter
OSHA Struggles When Tower Climbers Die

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Better Than We Found It
The Good-Natured Dictator

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101

Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Republicans Make War on the Environment

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   

Posted on Apr 16, 2011
Flickr / kathleencaring

The U.S. is caught up in three wars, a budget crisis and high unemployment. So what are Republican politicians working on? Cutting long-standing environmental regulations and shifting the burden of oversight from the federal to the state level. —JCL

The New York Times:

Weeks after he was sworn in as governor of Maine, Paul LePage, a Tea Party favorite, announced a 63-point plan to cut environmental regulations, including opening three million acres of the North Woods for development and suspending a law meant to monitor toxic chemicals that could be found in children’s products.

Another Tea Party ally, Gov. Rick Scott of Florida, has proposed eliminating millions of dollars in annual outlays for land conservation as well as cutting to $17 million the $50 million allocated in last year’s budget for the restoration of the dwindling Everglades.

And in North Carolina, where Republicans won control of both houses of the Legislature for the first time in 140 years, leaders recently proposed a budget that would cut operating funds to the state’s Department of Environment and Natural Resources by 22 percent.

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


New and Improved Comments

We are launching a major overhaul of our comments section.

In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread.

Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts.

Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with.

Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page.

By samosamo, April 17, 2011 at 3:18 pm Link to this comment

****************


Geez, NCEE is nothing but another Orwellian department much
like the Ministry of Truth.

Report this
John M's avatar

By John M, April 17, 2011 at 12:59 pm Link to this comment

Inside the National Center for Environmental
Economics, analysts scurried to finish the vital
technical support document to fulfill President
Obama’s most draconian campaign pledge: “Implement an
economywide cap-and-trade program to reduce
greenhouse gas emissions 80 percent by 2050.”

The NCEE was ready to cement the case for the
Environmental Protection Agency’s “endangerment
finding,” the official declaration that carbon
dioxide from burning fossil fuels poses a threat to
human health and welfare. Thousands of government
careers, academic contracts, and Big Green grants
hung in the balance, and EPA Administrator Lisa
Jackson needed to release it within days.

But senior research analyst Alan Carlin, Ph.D., a 38-
year EPA veteran never known as an ideologue,
submitted his unlikely critique that the agency’s
case was full of predetermined, politically mandated,
cherry-picked scientific garbage.

Carlin criticized as many details as possible in the
four days before the finding’s release: EPA had
relied on outdated research and ignored major new
developments, including declines in global
temperatures, projections that hurricanes won’t get
worse, and findings that ocean cycles best explain
temperature fluctuations.

“I did the reasonable thing,” said Carlin. “I applied
the scientific method to every study used in EPA’s
technical support document,” as you’d expect from a
man with a physics degree from CalTech and a Ph.D. in
economics from Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Alarmingly, he found more computerized guesswork and
editing by advocates than observable results. Carlin
urgently requested that his report be forwarded
immediately to top decision makers.

The director refused. In an email to Carlin, he said,
“The administrator and the administration has decided
to move forward on endangerment, and your comments do
not help the legal or policy case for this decision.”

Imperiling his career, Carlin explained that he knew
where his duty lay concerning scientific truth and
the administration, and got these appalling replies:
“I don’t want you to spend any additional EPA time on
climate change,” and, “Do not have any direct
communication with anyone outside of NCEE on
endangerment. There should be no meetings, emails,
written statements, phone calls etc.”

The message: Dr. Carlin, hush your mouth. EPA
Administrator Jackson and President Obama have made
up their minds. Don’t bother them with facts. And
don’t you dare tell the American public. Hush!

An outraged source in EPA who was not Carlin passed
the whistleblower documents and emails to Sam Kazman,
general counsel of Competitive Enterprise Institute,
a Washington free-market think tank.

Kazman was astounded by the “Hush” emails, accepted
the case, and began a successful campaign to make the
suppression of Carlin’s report a cause celebre. A few
days later, the Waxman-Markey cap-and-trade bill
barely passed the Democrat-held House and the Senate
warily let the measure die.

But EPA released its endangerment finding, which
immediately faced an appeals court challenge.

As Obama’s much-touted “science-based policy” rotted
into “policy-based science,” Big Green sycophants
praised the administration in a quarter-page
Washington Post ad.

And so we got Hushgate. That was two years ago. Two
weeks ago, Carlin’s report, updated, expanded, and
peer-reviewed, was published in the respected
International Journal of Environmental Research and
Public Health.

http://washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columnists/2011
/04/ron-arnold-suppressed-epa-hushgate-climate-
report-returns-snag-co2-regula

Report this
John M's avatar

By John M, April 17, 2011 at 12:30 pm Link to this comment

yeah and it’s because of the all knowing idiots in
Washington that my toilet not flush on the first try -
wipe out manufacturing jobs in Virginia by banning
normal light bulbs. And decided CO2 is pollution but
still allow millions of tons of CO2 to be used by the
beverage industry. And my state has grandma use 6
gallons of water rinsing out a jelly jar to be recycled
when it’s made of glass and we all know that’s made
from sand and you know how scarce sand is…......Oh and don’t forget the special truck that has to come around to pick up the melted sand .....

Report this
John M's avatar

By John M, April 17, 2011 at 12:28 pm Link to this comment

yeah and it’s because of the all knowing idiots in
Washington that my toilet not flush on the first try -
wipe out manufacturing jobs in Virginia by banning
normal light bulbs. And decided CO2 is pollution but
still allow millions of tons of CO2 to be used by the
beverage industry. And my state has grandma use 6
gallons of water rinsing out a jelly jar to be recycled
when it’s made of glass and we all know that’s made
from sand and you know how scarce sand is…......

Report this

By felicity, April 17, 2011 at 11:12 am Link to this comment

“...opening three million acres of the North Woods
for development…”  And that ‘development’ would be? 
Some mega-rich nabob has his eye on turning a 100,000
acre tract of it into a third vacation home, maybe?

And, it’s rumored that
environmentalists/environmentalism is a Communist
plot so…Communist plot?  These guys really suffer
from severe, are plagued with phobia - irrational
fear, aversion, dislike of someone or something.  Or
maybe they figure that if they tag something
“Communist” everyone will be on their side?  Or maybe
they’re just plug nuts.

Report this

By samosamo, April 16, 2011 at 10:57 pm Link to this comment

****************


Can’t tell which neocon think tank this one came out of but it
sure is a neocon boomerang tactic where the epa comes under
state purview so when a new state epa decides to act on some
criminal environmental issue, all the corporations have to do
is go to their well lobbied(bribed) federal judges or the even
more bought up and out, scotus to get any decisions or
injunctions overturned.

There is so much these neocon think tanks, now serving tea
on regular basis, turn out that isn’t really unheard of, it is that
there are so many ways to turn the screw that the people find
they should have been looking there when they were actually
looking here kind of thing.

Report this

By TDoff, April 16, 2011 at 3:15 pm Link to this comment

Geez, genus republicanus is not only genetically burdened with malfunctioning digestive tracts that emit copious amounts of methane gases from both ends, but now they are planning to purposely further degrade the environment?

Report this
Newsletter

Get Truthdig in your inbox


 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2012 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.