LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman. Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
May 20, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     elizabeth warren     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

Rise Up or Die

Global Capital and the Nation State

College: A Lesson in Inequality

Obama Unscathed by Scandals, Mayor Denies Smoking Crack, and More

DOJ Allegedly Spied on Fox News Correspondent, the FBI Investigates Bachmann, and More

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * What Will Tighter Restrictions on Trade in Iran Do?
 * NEW! * Is Democracy in Trouble?

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Act of Congress
Daily Rituals
The Girls of Atomic City

Digs

Truthdig Bazaar
In the Hot Zone

In the Hot Zone

By Kevin Sites
$15.95

Desert Reckoning

Desert Reckoning

By Deanne Stillman
$24.99

more items

 
Ear to the Ground

GM’s Electric Wonder Will Cost You

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Jul 27, 2010
GM

Back when GM was going down the tubes, we heard an awful lot about a futuristic electric car that would save the company. The Chevy Volt finally has a price tag, and it’s set at a luxurious $41,000 (before a substantial tax rebate).

On a three-year lease, however, the Volt can be yours for $350 a month, keeping it competitive with the much cheaper (to buy) and hideous Nissan Leaf.

Unlike the all-electric Leaf, the Volt can eat gas if you don’t get a chance to plug it in or you drive beyond its quoted 40-mile electric range.  —PZS

Autoblog:

General Motors’ recently hired vice-president for sales and marketing Joel Ewanick took the stage at the Plug-In 2010 conference in San Jose, CA today and finally revealed that the 2011 Chevrolet Volt will have a base price of $41,000 (including a $720 destination charge) before federal and state tax incentives. While GM hasn’t gone as aggressive as most people had hoped on the sticker price, the real deal appears to be the $350 per month for 36 months lease. That matches the monthly payment that Nissan is charging for the Leaf EV.

The effective purchase price of the Volt will be cut to $33,500 with a $7,500 federal tax credit (hence the asterisk in the title), but buyers will have to finance the $41,000 and get the credit back on their next tax return. Lease customers will have the credit factored in to their payment. The Volt lease requires a $2,500 down payment (vs $2,000 for the Leaf), but GM is including a clause in the lease contract that allows leasers to buy the car at the end of their term so that the automaker don’t have another standoff with customers like it did with the all-electric EV1.

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By Auto Parts, March 15, 2012 at 12:38 am Link to this comment

Maybe with the substantial incentive, more people can get on the electric car bandwagon. Electric cars really need a boost in popularity and acceptance in the US if it wants to continue being produced and sold there. For now, things are not really looking good for hybrids and electrics.

Report this

By Jim Yell, July 29, 2010 at 9:21 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Innovation calls for using tech in ways that compliment the environment that it is used in. So in the Southwest solar panels would seem to make a lot of sense along with wind generators. It would seem a garage properly provided with solar panels could keep an electric car charged for use for daily local use.

In areas where these are not possible wind electric generators with back up batteries would provide for both house and transport. Water driven generators and tidal generators.

But, let’s skip to the cars themselves. It seems to me these lease schemes are a way for GM and others to keep control of the vehicle and to get twice as much money for them in the long term. Lease for the price and profit of the car and then buy for the further profit from the car. Doesn’t sound like a good deal to me.

As far as the car goes we have to remember that GM offered this car and then sabotaged it and no one has built the infrastructure to support electric cars. It is like selling trains without first building the tracks.

The only realitic program that I have heard of is the one the Chinese are using in Israel in which they are building the infrastructure to create the market for the electric cars. When we see this we will see reality and not a bunch of press release announcements. In this country the auto makers should pick a few high population cities across the country, put in the infrastructure (aka charging stations), garages with ability to maintian electrics and the start selling electric cars. There will be a market then, but still something needs to be done about the overcharging for each car.

Report this

By jph, July 29, 2010 at 6:28 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

It seems most likely that ‘Ice Ages’ are caused by a warming atmosphere,. In fact the prediction is that our current unnatural warming efforts could bring about the next Glacial Age 80,000 years sooner than the natural cycle.

There is a good artical speculating on this subject here;

http://www.scribd.com/doc/9381189/An-Ice-Age-From-Global-Warming

“It is not unreasonable to assume that the previous 20-or-so ice ages came on like that.
And while another would not normally be due for perhaps as much as a hundred millennia, we humans, all by ourselves, may have generated adequate greenhouse gases
like carbon dioxide, methane, and others to prematurely precipitate a new ice age soon.”

So yeah, electric cars may be helpfull in lessening GW however it all depends on how they are produced and how the electricity is generated, as both require great inputs of energy.  The more usefull move is to lessen consumption generaly, reduce the numbers of cars, and implement wide spread Permaculture to help mitigate and reverse the warming trend.

  The main problem is cultural one. The focuse on material consumption, with little regard to conections and concequenses, is a child-like mentality that if humanity can not collectively out grow, will prove a tragic sortcoming of our greedy culture.  Dieback on epic scale is then the inevitable result of not acting now to shift our focus away from selfish materialim, to a more productive human culture of interconected cooperation, embracing out larger selves that include the living systems that we are but a part of. 

Those arguing against action are like children refusing to clean up thier room.  Perhaps a good spanking and no dinner will do the trick.

Report this

By christian96, July 29, 2010 at 12:54 am Link to this comment

JPH—-What caused the “ice” age?

Report this

By mbt, July 28, 2010 at 7:12 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Google has enough money to do anything it wants to… I would not surprise me to see google getting into the social media craze.

Report this

By Ibh, July 28, 2010 at 5:49 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

The pigman - Rush said in his show today that gm
had approached him to do a commercial for the
- he turned them down.

Enough said although I have bee on the list to purchase
one I will now purchase the Nissan Leaf simply
because they considered him

If you are a ’ liberal’ tell gm that stupid ignorant
illeterate teabaggers are too poor to
purchase one - they are not their target market.

Report this

By Big B, July 28, 2010 at 2:42 pm Link to this comment

Climate change deniers, look at it this way, no matter what is happening right now, this truth is currently being recognized, petroleum and all its byproducts will disappear in our lifetimes. That’s right folks, even the oil company geologists agree that we only have about 30-40 years of usable, relatively cheap oil left to pump. Does everybody realize what that means? Not just no more gasoline or diesel, no more rubber, plastics, roads, you name it. There is petroleum by-product in more things than you know. And what will we replace it with? at the volume that the whole planet will need?

Most of the oil may be gone in my lifetime (I am 46) For the more lurid observer it may indeed be interesting to watch if we do the right thing and switch over to clean/green energy, or if we spiral out of control into some apocolyptic wasteland.

Report this
rico, suave's avatar

By rico, suave, July 28, 2010 at 2:02 pm Link to this comment

so left:

Hey. Where’s the love??

Report this
cpb's avatar

By cpb, July 28, 2010 at 1:41 pm Link to this comment

The issue of burning fossil fuel in order to generate
the electricity to charge these cars is genuine but it
should be understood that the NET balance is still in
favour of electrics.  The combined efficiency when you
account for initial power generation and then
subsequently powering the car is greater than the
alternative using a gasoline engine.  The ‘per mile’
footprint is less, manufacturing aside.  In some regions
where the initial power is generated using hydro power
the overall greenhouse footprint begins to make a
substantial drop.  Should alternative power development
overlap appropriately with steadily improving battery
technology the future of the internal combustion engine
becomes quite clear.

Report this

By Tom Weidermeijer, July 28, 2010 at 12:57 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

@purplewolf

The commercial you are talking about with trains is that it can pull 1 ton of freight 400+ miles for a gallon of fuel is all done with economies of scale.  A train can’t go very far on a gallon of diesel, but a full train IS very economical on a ton/gallon basis.  So, in answer to your question why can’t we do that with cars… well, we can.  They are call buses.  BUT like the train example, they have to be full.

Report this

By jph, July 28, 2010 at 6:49 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

“What caused hot humid weather back in 1850?”

Since there where many people in 1850 there could not possibly be any MORE people in 2010?  This is the deductive logic you employ in your childish denialism of the real effects of human activity especialy industrialisation.

“The evidence comes from direct measurements of rising surface air temperatures and subsurface ocean temperatures and from phenomena such as increases in average global sea levels, retreating glaciers, and changes in many physical and biological systems, for example increased drought, flooding and other natural disasters.

These changes are indeed the result of human activities. Atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases, including carbon dioxide, methane, tropospheric ozone, and nitrous oxide, have been rising exponentially since pre-industrial times. Carbon dioxide levels have increased from 280 ppm (parts per million) in 1750 to over 375 ppm today – higher than any previous levels that can be reliably measured (i.e. in the last 420,000 years). Climate change is happening now!”

Still engaging in polite debat I see; “You’re an idiot.”  pot kettle.

Report this

By purplewolf, July 28, 2010 at 6:10 am Link to this comment

Finally some people are thinking about the cost of electricity and batteries and the electrical cost is not free and still leaves us in almost the same situation as gas powered cars and where do they think the energy for the electrical cars is going to come from, not all solar or wind powered, but probably caol burning energy sources instead. No one here in the former “Buick City” of Flint, Mi., is planning on buying one of these over priced cars. Can’t afford it on burger flipping wages or the lesser wait staff income and as for full time workers-hah.That is if you still have a job.

40 miles is nothing. I used to do home care and many days had to drive over 200 miles on 90 minute to 2 hour jobs just to get an 8 hour day-no time to charge up the car let alone make it to work-when there was any. And most clients probably wouldn’t or couldn’t allow you to charge your car at their homes adding to their electric bills, this is not a practical idea.

What about the ads that are on TV for the trains that run over 500 miles pulling hundreds of tons of freight on 1 gallon of gas. If they can do that for trains, why haven’t they done it for cars, except big oil would be a lot less richer.

Report this

By diman, July 28, 2010 at 5:59 am Link to this comment

What did you expect people, look at the price of oil, Volt is not constructed of materials made of soybeans, it is made out of oil, all the plastic and paint, its tires, its bowels. Everything is an oil derived product in this utopian piece of junk and it will take an advanced electrical grid to charge the thing. How do you produce electricity to charge this car? You burn coal and oil in the furnaces of American power plants, so once again, let me ask you, what is the fucking point.

Report this
knobcreekfarmer's avatar

By knobcreekfarmer, July 28, 2010 at 3:03 am Link to this comment

christian96 ,

There have been many times electric cars have tried to make headway in the auto
industry over the years. Only to be repressed by you-know-who. You can start
here: http://www.whokilledtheelectriccar.com/

Rico,

Thank you for your mindless and lemming like climate change denial crowd drivel.
It’s obvious that your very existence is an insult to mankind, the earth and God.
With that in mind go to hell.

Report this

By christian96, July 27, 2010 at 9:29 pm Link to this comment

If the engineers can now develop electric vehicles
couldn’t they have done so back in the mid-1970’s
when the phony oil crisis had lines backed up for
blocks waiting to get gas?  Of course they could
have!  We went to the moon and back didn’t we?
Then, I have to ask myself, “Self, why didn’t they
do it?”  Amused, my self responded, “Because the
people making money on gasoline didn’t want the
electric car introduced so they concocted this idea
that there was a shortage of gasoline to give them
an excuse to raise prices and make MORE money.  The
timeline for electric cars was established in board
rooms years ago.”  Would the general population
smell the rats in the board rooms?  Of course not.
They had been conditioned to watch games, movies,
television programs, wrestling, car races, Hollyweird gossip, etc.  The rats in board rooms
then collaborated with the Arab rats who owned the
oil and all at once we had ourselves a genuine oil
crisis.  There was a crisis all right but it didn’t
have anything to do with oil.  The crisis was in
the morals(or should I say “lack of morals”) among
the collaborating rats.  PREDICTION:  The price
of gasoline will go sky high before the electric
cars take over.  Isn’t life interesting?

Report this
rico, suave's avatar

By rico, suave, July 27, 2010 at 8:34 pm Link to this comment

“hot humid weather caused by the fossil fuel burning power plant generating the “clean” electricity”

What caused hot humid weather back in 1850?

You’re an idiot.

Report this

By Ray, July 27, 2010 at 7:46 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I have no interest in the Volt until they replace the Korean-made Lithium Manganate battery with an American-made Lithium Phosphate battery. That LMO battery (made by LG) is NOT SAFE for use in automobiles. They mitigate the safety risks by building an armored case so that WHEN it explodes the blast goes downward. Charge it too fast, it will explode. Charge regulator allows it to charge too much, it will explode. Get into an accident, it will explode. Why oh why couldn’t they wait a little longer so they could sell the car with a SAFE, American-made LFP battery?????

Report this
knobcreekfarmer's avatar

By knobcreekfarmer, July 27, 2010 at 7:06 pm Link to this comment

Ask’m how much battery life (range) you’ll loose when you flip on the AC to
counter the hot humid weather caused by the fossil fuel burning power plant
generating the “clean” electricity?

Or, how much battery life (range) you’ll loose when you flip on the defroster when
it gets cold?

Come on, Isn’t there any other way? Guess not. We have to be able to drive to
Starbucks and then go buy shit!

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.