Keep firing them and eventually you will get a keeper. Barack Obama has betrayed all the principles he claimed to get elected. If you can’t replace them with better than at least you can fire them to keep the rest of the liars on their toes.
Could Mitt Romney in reality actually be worse than Barack Obama, it’s hard to imagine.
In this final year of Barack Obama reign, via the Trans Pacific Treaty, he is trying to strip other countries of universal health care and trying to guarantee the US never ever gets it a true tool of the Insurance companies, something he can not blame on Republicans in the congress or senate.

@heterochromatic

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Happy to augment; glaucoma (reduces inter-ocular
pressure), chemotherapy (reduces nausea, increases appetite), multiple sclerosis (spasmodic reductions),
effective reduction and/or abstinence from alcohol
abuse. Arthritis is another area where pot can be an
effective remedy.
I would suggest that vapor is likely better than
smoke for some. As to dose; that is a very subjective
and will vary from individual, so experimintation is
called for. Given there is no reported fatal dose for
pot, it’s pretty safe to experiment for optimum dose
levels. Many of the legal versions (Marinol for one)
are not effective for many people.
If one investigates folk remedies through the ages
and many cultures, both western and eastern, there is
a wealth of information going back thousands of
years.
What I listed above are recognized by “modern”
medical studies and there is a wealth of info on the
internet. Careful investigation will reveal the wheat
from the chaff, so-to-speak. Cheers.

YHX—I’m quite willing to learn and to be corrected….if you care to correct me,
but my local authority administers it only to her patients who are getting chemo
and are extraordinarily nauseated to the point where they can’t keep anything
down…and then it’s either pill or suppository.

smoke or vapor too impure and too difficult to gauge intake or uptake…..

please correct or augment.

@ heterochromatic, May 8 at 1:07 pm Link to this
comment
““I know just a little bit about medical marijuana””
and know that it is not the most
efficacious thing available for more than one or two
applications.
~~~~~~~~~~~~
Right! Your post is evidence of that; and the rest of
your post is “factually” incorrect.

restriction of marijuana started out state-by-state, but considering that the stuff
was imported, i don’t see any 10 Am bar to federal regulation.

This is a 10th amendment issue where the Feds should butt out.

There are many more positive items with cannibis than bad.

http://www.world-mysteries.com/hemp4all.htm

Read the piece, Greenwald published an amendation after Sullivan criticized his
inaccuracy.

as for whether pot should be banned and alcohol not…... there is no good reason
other than popular misconception. excessive alcohol consumption is probably
more harmful to the mind and body.

OK hetero, what’s inaccurate in Greenwalds piece? (well, your version of inaccurate)

While your at it, tell me whats the difference between someone drinking everyday until their drunk, and someone blazing up every day. I don’t approve of either, but why is one legal, and one not?

Like you dodge the truth.

Who cares?

I know just a little bit about medical marijuana and know that it is not the most
efficacious thing available for more than one or two applications.

medical marijuana is pretty much just a dodge.

Ah, the literary critic no-neck back to give us all the rundown.

What a crock.

Obomber has no sense of justice—he’s just a weasel in a 5000 dollar suit and a suntan.

And he gives wesels and suntans BOTH a bad name.

Greenwald again prints things that he’s require to amend…....

if the dude ever calms down and composes his writings after he composes
himself, he may turn out to be less annoying and more accurate.

Boycott all elections! Is there really anyone to vote for that has not been taken by the body snatchers? There is no longer any lesser of two evils!