LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman. Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
May 25, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     elizabeth warren     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

Three Questions Left Unanswered by Obama’s Counterterrorism Speech

Colbert Slams PBS for Appeasing Koch Brothers

How to Make a Million Dollars an Hour

'Left, Right & Center': Obama Ends the War on Terror

Marching in Chicago: Resisting Rahm Emanuel’s Neoliberal Savagery

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
New York City’s Summers May Heat Up

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
A Call to Action
Act of Congress

Digs

Truthdig Bazaar
Why Socrates Died

Why Socrates Died

By Robin Waterfield
$17.99

more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Funding Campaigns ... Anonymously

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Feb 28, 2010
AP / J. Scott Applewhite

Critics believe the Supreme Court’s decision to allow corporations to spend whatever they want on political campaigns greatly decreases the chances politicians have of getting elected without being burdened by corporate tutelage.

The ridiculous Supreme Court decision to let corporations spend whatever they want on behalf of political candidates just got more ridiculous: Lawyers say that under the ruling there’s a loophole that would allow companies to do so anonymously.

Experts say the ruling allows corporations and unions to give anonymously to nonprofits, which then can turn around and finance political advertisements for a particular candidate. —JCL

The New York Times:

The Supreme Court decision last month allowing corporations to spend unlimited money on behalf of political candidates left a loophole that campaign finance lawyers say could allow companies to pay for extensive political advertising while avoiding the disclosure requirements the court appeared to leave intact.

Experts say the ruling, along with a pair of earlier Supreme Court cases, makes it possible for corporations and unions to donate anonymously to nonprofit civic leagues and trade associations. The groups can then use the money to finance the types of political advertisements that were at the heart of last month’s ruling, in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission.

Well before the Citizens United case, certain types of nonprofit organizations were able to pump millions of dollars into “electioneering communications” — highly pointed commercials about political issues that can even mention specific candidates — without revealing their donors.

For the first time, though, as a result of the ruling, corporations will be able to spend unlimited amounts of money on advertisements expressly advocating for a candidate’s election or defeat. The ruling also clears the way, for the first time, for corporations to donate money to nonprofit groups that place advocacy advertisements.

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

EJH's avatar

By EJH, February 28, 2010 at 5:44 pm Link to this comment

MarthaA - Thank you for visiting.  I wish more people
would look at issues from the standpoint of the
victims, most of whom normally remain nameless and
faceless.  http://theunpeople.blogspot.com/

Report this
MarthaA's avatar

By MarthaA, February 28, 2010 at 5:31 pm Link to this comment

People can’t fund campaigns anonymously, why let corporations? 

I agree, a revolution must be in the making, woe when it breaks out.


I like your Plight of the Unpeople site.

Report this
EJH's avatar

By EJH, February 28, 2010 at 3:12 pm Link to this comment

Why are Americans getting so worked up over this
supreme court decision?  Of course, allowing
corporations buy elections is disgusting, but they have
been able to do that for generations.  The only
difference now is that there is no longer a bunch of
laws to give the appearance that politicians and
elections are not going to the highest bidder.  Why do
Americans prefer to be fooled?  If you don’t like your
ugly political system, don’t whine about petty details
and appearances, revolt. 
http://theunpeople.blogspot.com/

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.