|
|
May 25, 2013
|
|
Funding Campaigns ... AnonymouslyPosted on Feb 28, 2010
The ridiculous Supreme Court decision to let corporations spend whatever they want on behalf of political candidates just got more ridiculous: Lawyers say that under the ruling there’s a loophole that would allow companies to do so anonymously. Experts say the ruling allows corporations and unions to give anonymously to nonprofits, which then can turn around and finance political advertisements for a particular candidate. —JCL
Advertisement New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By EJH, February 28, 2010 at 5:44 pm Link to this comment
MarthaA - Thank you for visiting. I wish more people
Report thiswould look at issues from the standpoint of the
victims, most of whom normally remain nameless and
faceless. http://theunpeople.blogspot.com/
By MarthaA, February 28, 2010 at 5:31 pm Link to this comment
People can’t fund campaigns anonymously, why let corporations?
I agree, a revolution must be in the making, woe when it breaks out.
Report thisI like your Plight of the Unpeople site.
By EJH, February 28, 2010 at 3:12 pm Link to this comment
Why are Americans getting so worked up over this
Report thissupreme court decision? Of course, allowing
corporations buy elections is disgusting, but they have
been able to do that for generations. The only
difference now is that there is no longer a bunch of
laws to give the appearance that politicians and
elections are not going to the highest bidder. Why do
Americans prefer to be fooled? If you don’t like your
ugly political system, don’t whine about petty details
and appearances, revolt.
http://theunpeople.blogspot.com/