LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
2010 Webby Award Winner for Best Political Blog
 
May 26, 2012
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     gay marriage     barack obama     ndaa     robert scheer     chris hedges
Most Read

TED: 'A Money-Soaked Orgy of Self-Congratulatory Futurism'

Russia and Exxon Mobil Sign Arctic Oil Deal

Truthdiggers of the Week: 400,000 Canadians Launching the ‘Maple Spring’

I Can't Hear Myself Think

A Rare Admission That Money Trumps Everything Else

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
Why Bain Questions Matter
OSHA Struggles When Tower Climbers Die

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Better Than We Found It
The Good-Natured Dictator

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101

Truthdig Bazaar
Storm from the East

Storm from the East

Milton Viorst
$ 11.16

more items

 
Ear to the Ground

From ‘Sons of Confederate Veterans’ to Children’s Ears

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   

Posted on Oct 20, 2010
Flickr / fauxto_digit (CC-BY)

A Virginia fourth-grade textbook falsely claims that “Thousands of Southern blacks fought in the Confederate ranks” during the Civil War. The author of the book relied heavily on a pro-Confederacy group she found on the Internet.

Washington Post via NPR:

The Sons of Confederate Veterans, a group of male descendants of Confederate soldiers based in Columbia, Tenn., has long maintained that substantial numbers of black soldiers fought for the South The group’s historian-in-chief, Charles Kelly Barrow, has written the book “Black Confederates.”

The Sons of Confederate Veterans also disputes the widely accepted conclusion that the struggle over slavery was the main cause of the Civil War. Instead, the group says, the war was fought “to preserve their homes and livelihood,” according to John Sawyer, chief of staff of the Sons of Confederate Veterans’ Army of Northern Virginia. He said the group was pleased that a state textbook accepted some of its views.

Read more

Historians, of course, reject such nonsense. Most troubling of all, the book made it through a series of checks and was labeled “accurate and unbiased” by the Virginia Education Department.  —PZS

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


New and Improved Comments

We are launching a major overhaul of our comments section.

In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread.

Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts.

Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with.

Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page.

By Glenn Fritz, October 21, 2010 at 11:20 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

The Civil War was fought between the manufacturing protectionist North and the free trader agrarian South. 

Popular culture portrays it as a war over slavery.  Read Lincoln’s Inaugural Address of 1861.  The failure of the South to enforce protectionist tariffs is the only fight promised by Lincoln. 

Lincoln’s resolution of the slavery issue only came into play when his heavy handed efforts to enforce the central government expansion of powers in violation of state sovereignty were not yet decisive. 

Thanks to the strong central government and the conversion of the United States from a voluntary association to a coercive association, states such as California are restricted in how clean they can keep their air by federal regulations; and all states are restricted in their attempts to enact single payer health care by ERISA, a federal law.

To those who celebrate the power of the central government and credit it with civil rights legislation, remember it was the Supreme Court that decided and the central government that enforced the Dred Scott decision, and Chief Justice Taney that declared a black man had no rights a white man was bound to honor.

Report this

By Rodney, October 21, 2010 at 10:52 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

This is what is happening in our country today. The
racists and bigots attempt to rewrite history. The
same thing is happening in Texas schools. They want
to teach hatred and racism in a way to soften what
really happened in our nation. Things like most
slaves were happy being slaves and the white man did
them a favor by bringing them here to America. Even
today, the Tea baggers act as if Obama by himself
bailed out the banks. Or he started the recession or
he caused all of the nations debt. They act as if
there was no George W. Bush since he is hiding in
Texas until after the elections.They can’t seem to
recall that Ronald Racist I mean Reagan and both
Bushes ran up the deficits by giving tax cut to
millionaires and billionaires and fighting wars
without paying for them. They seem to forget that 14
trillion dollars in the stock market was stolen and
gambled away under Bush with no accountability. Now
they are about to take over congress to do it all
over again. The real goal is to bring back the
conditions of slavery where you have the very rich
{Masters and slave owners} and the poor {people
working for slave wages without benefits, job
protections and safety protections or health care.}
At that point they can restore America to it’s
illustreious past. No women’s right especially white
women to have an abortion in order to maintain a
white majority. No workers rights. Slave wages or no
job at all. Repeal of the 14th amendment and the full
return of states rights so discrimination can become
legal again. Rewriting history is the first step to
achieving that goal.

Report this
Rigor's avatar

By Rigor, October 21, 2010 at 8:32 am Link to this comment

Slavery, in any form is, of course, an absolute
crime against humanity. In my opinion second only to
cannibalism.
While the symbols of this atrocity generate hatred
very much the same as the hatred that they represent
- in itself a mindbending oxymoron, (few realize the
swastika is also a hindu religious symbol, so would
you deny hindus’ their religious freedom because of
it?). The stars & bars were created simply to be an
easily recognizable symbol on an otherwise chaotic
battlefield, and to deny it, to bury it as though it
never existed, is to forget the lessons learned from
such an inhumane social structure.
And while so many are quick to jump on the racist
hate wagon over slavery they also donate millions to
rescue Haiti which practices slavery to this day, as
well as sit back while our govt. makes a 60 billion
dollar arms deal with Saudi Arabia, ground zero for
the origins of the slave trade and an integral part
of its current social structure.
Who has the audacity to say a cotton slave 300
years ago is not the same as a sex slave in Mexico
City today?
To the point of this article: to deny blacks served
in the confederacy is to deny truth, but such
subjects have much deeper topics to understand
completely, and require the understanding that we
are not the people we were then. If you think we are
you are no better than the people you hate.

Report this

By Inherit The Wind, October 20, 2010 at 7:57 pm Link to this comment

And the indoctrination and de-education of our children in the march to facism is in progress.

Report this

By hammersmith, October 20, 2010 at 4:28 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

berniem, if u had added the stars and stripes to that rant u might have said something.  but u did not and u said nothing.

Report this

By gerard, October 20, 2010 at 3:09 pm Link to this comment

Tortured consciences will do a lot to try to make wrongs right.  It’s pathetic.

Report this

By berniem, October 20, 2010 at 2:54 pm Link to this comment

In the interest of full disclosure I am neither Jewish nor African-American. That said, I cannot for the life of me see any difference between the repugnant symbolism of the confederate flag and the swastika banner of the nazi period in Germany. Both of these rags stand for oppression, inhumanity, intolerance, domination, and murder. There is nothing honorable about the “stars and bars” or those who hold it in reverence!

Report this
Newsletter

Get Truthdig in your inbox


 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2012 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.