|
|||
|
Free Birth Control Possible With Health Care OverhaulPosted on Jul 20, 2011
Health insurance companies may soon be required to provide women with free birth control, among other services, as part of the health care law passed last year. The law requires that health insurance plans provide a given set of preventive health services to patients without co-payments or deductibles, and Tuesday an independent panel of health specialists released its recommendation of what those services should include for women. Commissioned by the U.S Department of Health and Human Services, the Institute of Medicine recommended that insurers cover “the full range” of FDA-approved contraceptives including sterilization and patient counseling, as well as coverage for breast pump rental, domestic violence counseling, and annual wellness exams and HIV tests. —BF
Advertisement New and Improved CommentsWe are launching a major overhaul of our comments section. In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread. Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts. Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with. Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page. |
By christian96, July 21, 2011 at 7:41 pm Link to this comment
How about free Viagra or Cialis for senior citizens?
Report thisMy insurance company, “Express Scripts”, classified
both as recreational drugs and removed their availability to retired teachers. I informed the
agent, “You are breaking up marriages! If a woman’s
husband can’t get it up his wife will go find someone who can!” My reasoning fell on deaf ears!
Still no Viagra or Cialis!
By TDoff, July 21, 2011 at 5:42 am Link to this comment
People who don’t support wars of aggression started by lying ‘conservative’ NeoCon rat bas***ds, shouldn’t have to pay for them, either, according to the Family Research Council’s logic.
Report thisBy Health Care Mailing Lists, July 20, 2011 at 10:53 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Fifty years after the pill, another birth control revolution may be on the horizon: free contraception for women in the U.S., thanks to the new health care law.
Report thisBy gstoddard, July 20, 2011 at 7:51 pm Link to this comment
“The Family Research Council, a conservative public-policy outfit, said it opposed a
mandate to make birth-control coverage free, because people who don’t support
contraception shouldn’t have to subsidize its use by others.”
Doesn’t this get to the core issue in the abortion debate? The argument presented above
highlights the problem. In our democracy, or republic if you prefer, isn’t it the case that
many of us subsidize policies that we have fundamental disagreements with as we
participate with our neighbors in the democratic process. Sometimes we win and
sometimes we lose but if the decision making process is fair and balanced (another
expression that has been perverted in our current rhetoric) those of us on the losing side
move slowly toward acceptance of the will of the majority.
Isn’t it the case that if we promote the use of effective contraceptive methods that it will
decrease the need for abortions resulting from unwanted pregnancies? Why is this so
threatening to organizations like the Family Research Council? (A rhetorical question I
guess. They are just uncomfortable with normal human sexual behavior) It is my sense
that these same people oppose many of the social programs that are needed to provide
for the children that are the obvious consequence of the unwanted pregnancies.
Isn’t there some cognitive dissonance in play here?
Report this