Top Leaderboard, Site wide
October 20, 2014
Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines
Sign up for Truthdig's Email NewsletterLike Truthdig on FacebookFollow Truthdig on TwitterSubscribe to Truthdig's RSS Feed

Get Truthdig's headlines in your inbox!


The Imperative of Revolt
Scientists Refute Lower Emissions Claim for Fracking




Mad Pilgrimage of the Flesh


Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Former Justice John Paul Stevens: Legalize Pot

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Apr 26, 2014

    The third-longest serving justice in history, John Paul Stevens was appointed by President Gerald Ford in 1975. AP/Danny Johnston

The leading Supreme Court liberal who retired in 2010 said Saturday that the federal government should legalize marijuana, drawing parallels with the failure of alcohol prohibition.

The 94-year-old Stevens was discussing his new book in an interview with National Public Radio. When asked whether federal laws should follow those in states such as Washington and Colorado that have legalized the drug, he said, “Yes.”

He continued: “Public opinion has changed and recognized that the distinction between marijuana and alcoholic beverages is really not much of a distinction. There’s a general consensus that prohibition against dispensing and selling alcoholic beverages is not worth the cost, and I think really in time that will be the general consensus with this particular drug.

“It’s really a very similar problem to the whole problem with prohibition—and of course I lived through that, or part of that period.”

Of Stevens’ new book, The Guardian reports:

In his new book, Six Amendments: How and Why We Should Change the Constitution, Stevens also proposes banning capital punishment and limiting gun rights and discusses current controversies over campaign funding and affirmative action.

One of his proposed amendments would change the second amendment, which guarantees the right to bear arms, to say: “the right of the people to keep and bear arms when serving in the militia shall not be infringed”.

Stevens said the only effect of this change would be to remove the final say on gun rights from supreme court justices, and devolve it to individual states, since it is they who define what constitutes the militia in their territory.

—Posted by Alexander Reed Kelly.

More Below the Ad

Advertisement

Square, Site wide

New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

 
Right 1, Site wide - BlogAds Premium
 
Right 2, Site wide - Blogads
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
Right Skyscraper, Site Wide
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion   Publisher, Zuade Kaufman   Editor, Robert Scheer
© 2014 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.