LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman. Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
May 25, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     elizabeth warren     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

Three Questions Left Unanswered by Obama’s Counterterrorism Speech

How to Make a Million Dollars an Hour

Marching in Chicago: Resisting Rahm Emanuel’s Neoliberal Savagery

Colbert Slams PBS for Appeasing Koch Brothers

British Terror Attack Suspect Had Watched Friend Cut to Pieces

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * A Cooler Century? Wait and See
New York City’s Summers May Heat Up

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
A Call to Action
Act of Congress

Digs

Truthdig Bazaar
Lineages of the Absolutist State

Lineages of the Absolutist State

By Perry Anderson
$17.91

Field Days

Field Days

By Jonah Raskin
$16.47

more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Forget Polar Bears, We’re Killing Our Food

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on May 16, 2010
Flickr / Dodo-Bird (CC-BY)

Scientists once thought all that carbon dioxide that humans have been pumping into the atmosphere since the Industrial Revolution kicked off might be good for plants (even if it hotboxes the planet in the process), but recent studies show we have a lot to worry about.

It turns out that carbon dioxide, which plants depend on in normal doses, can, in excess, keep plants from absorbing important nutrients, according to the researchers. Put it this way: Too much carbon means unhealthy plants, and unhealthy plants means unhealthy humans.

If it becomes harder to raise crops and crops are less nutritious, we could have a very hard time feeding the growing global population—and we’re already not doing a very good job.  —PZS with help from TLC

Los Angeles Times:

The findings have significant implications for agriculture, biologists said. They suggest that, as global warming continues and carbon dioxide levels rise, food may become poorer in quality and nutrition, and farmers may have to worry about crops that could be more prone to pest infestations (as plant eaters may have to eat more to get the same nutritional value as before).

Farmers will have to figure out how to fertilize their crops without poisoning them, researchers said, since ammonium (another form of inorganic nitrogen that can be used to feed plants) is not subject to the nitrate inhibition issue but can be toxic if not used wisely.

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

MarthaA's avatar

By MarthaA, May 18, 2010 at 7:18 am Link to this comment

It is not silly to think that when polar bears become extinct,  that the human race won’t be shortly behind them; therefore, preserving the environment for the polar bears is of utmost importance.  As well as the high CO2 levels melting the ice, all the oil in the ocean undermines the polar bears food supply and when the polar bears food supply is undermined, so are the humans food supply.  Greed overlooks facts.

Report this

By SoTexGuy, May 17, 2010 at 5:41 pm Link to this comment

That’s all the world needs, more ‘hopeful’ online articles!

Yes, I do believe in the chance that we can change and make a positive difference.. no, I don’t rely on magical ‘hopeful’ thinking.

Adios!

Report this
prole's avatar

By prole, May 17, 2010 at 12:55 pm Link to this comment

Forget polar bears?? NEVER!! Shame on Truthdig! This in a nutshell illustrates the hubris of humans, who always put themselves first and can so quickly dispense with any concern for other endangered - and non-endangered - species. This is exactly why we have these kinds of monumental environmental disasters. Long live polar bears!

Report this

By TheBrix57, May 17, 2010 at 11:04 am Link to this comment

The article would have been much better if they had included their methodology of how the numbers were attained. Was it in a controlled setting where you deplete the oxygen levels while raising the carbon dioxide levels? If we don’t know how they reached their numbers, it becomes just another of the millions of poorly written scare tactics.

Report this

By mike112769, May 17, 2010 at 11:04 am Link to this comment

This is a typical gloom-and-doom article. The amount of CO2 needed to start harming plants would have us killed off before we could worry about the plants. TD, stop trying to terrify everyone with vague threats.

Report this

By gerard, May 17, 2010 at 10:52 am Link to this comment

I seriously suggest to Truthdig editors that they do some research online and find some worthy articles with a more hopeful tone. The amount of pessimism in present choices is overwhelming and militates, I think, against empowering people to do anything more than moan and groan. In the back of my mind I know of significant steps that are being taken toward “saving the world” and mitigating the coming crisis of corporate capitalism. 

Of course there is a lot of “end of time” religious junk listed under broad headings like “hope for the future” but if one can wade through it, there is other worthwhile thinking and action going on—albeit on a small scale, usually. Stuff like Fromthewilderness.com and survivingpeakoil.com turned up for me in just a few minutes, as examples.

Maybe I’m wrong, but I just can’t tolerate so much negative feedback and accept it as “balanced.”

Report this

By Druthers, May 17, 2010 at 9:47 am Link to this comment

The over population of the planet demanding ever increasing amounts of every ressource available is a problem that must be faced. 
If religions continue to brow beat people into a so called reproductive mode they are just sawing off the branch on which they are sitting.
We will probably either kill each other or be culled by some new fast spreading disease.
Our present state is unsustainable.

Report this
MarthaA's avatar

By MarthaA, May 17, 2010 at 9:45 am Link to this comment

The Right-Wing Corporate Conservative fascist Right-Wing Republican corporations’ socialist monopoly is only concerned about profit, capital, and money; killing the environment where the environment is no longer a habitat for humanity is the CEO’s profit agenda; protection of the environment for the non-human corporations, although run by humans, is not in the CEO’s repertoire.

Report this
johnnyfarout's avatar

By johnnyfarout, May 17, 2010 at 8:34 am Link to this comment

whoohoo!

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.