|
|||
|
FCC Rules for Super Wi-FiPosted on Sep 24, 2010
A bird? A plane? No, it’s super Wi-Fi! The FCC has finally approved a proposal to open the unused space between broadcast television channels—dubbed “white space”—for wide-radius high-speed wireless broadband ... or, in more campy terms, super Wi-Fi. The decision ends a years-long debate between the government and telecom companies over the use of “white space.” —JCL
Advertisement New and Improved CommentsWe are launching a major overhaul of our comments section. In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread. Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts. Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with. Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page. |
By Lafayette, September 26, 2010 at 12:27 pm Link to this comment
It’s about time. The US has been the “slow child” of DSL-braodband roll-out. Here are the top 20 countries worldwide of DSL penetration (Ars Technica, as of June last year):
* South Korea (95%)
* Singapore (88%)
* Netherlands (85%)
* Denmark (82%)
* Taiwan (81%)
* Hong Kong (81%)
* Israel (77%)
* Switzerland (76%)
* Canada (76%)
* Norway (75%)
* Australia (72%)
* Finland (69%)
* France (68%)
* United Kingdom (67%)
* United Arab Emirates (65%)
* Japan (64%)
* Sweden (63%)
* Estonia (62%)
* Belgium (62%)
* USA (60%)
As well, because the breakup of MaBell into the seven BabyBells was done to preserve telecoms concentrations in each of the regional companies created ... during the Reagan administration in 1984 (who else?). In these regional districts there is little effective competition in the subscriber-line market. Which has allowed the Baby-Bell incumbents to cherry-pick markets, that is, serve dense urban markets and leave rural markets to employ slower dial-up modems.
Until now, with this alternative means of transmission means. That is, it depends upon who gets the bandwidth segments and if real competition amongst the ISPs will be allowed.
And DSL is only one market in which “competition” is a well-recognized fallacy. Market concentration brings nice juicy profits, which is why BigBusiness spends BigBucks in Congress to obtain them.
Is this what we thought Free Market Competition was all about? Wakey, wakey ...
Report this