|
|
May 19, 2013
|
|
Ethics Panel Finds Wrongdoing by Rangel, Sources SayPosted on Jul 22, 2010
The House Ethics Committee isn’t known for throwing its own to the wolves, but word is that Rep. Charlie Rangel, the subject of a two-year investigation, could get slammed. Those anonymous sources that get quoted everywhere are telling media outlets, including The New York Times, that an investigatory subcommittee has found evidence of shenanigans. Shenanigans or not, the regular House panel, famous for developing some of the world’s most charitable admonishments, has yet to have its say. Update: The Washington Post has some updates here.
Rangel’s alleged violations may include getting a sweetheart deal on New York apartments, performing a legislative favor in exchange for a hefty donation and not reporting income on a Dominican villa. —PZS Advertisement Previous item: Oil Spill Has a Price Tag and It’s High Next item: One-Third of U.S. Counties Face Water Shortage New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By PatrickHenry, July 25, 2010 at 5:35 am Link to this comment
Term limits.
Report thisBy rollzone, July 24, 2010 at 7:06 pm Link to this comment
hello. if there was ever any guy begging for a full metal jacket facial solution, for his uncontrollable delight in abusing people: this is the fellow that gives street justice a good name. and i truly mean that in a good way. these crooks get where they are from enough bad vices of others, in their back pocket: to stink up a swamp. his fine will not change his hopes, he has everything he wants, way more than he needs. that this human waste represents our government and business as usual, and was a necessary component of this administration: very poorly reflects our entire system, here; and around the world.
Report thisBy rico, suave, July 23, 2010 at 4:59 am Link to this comment
Pat:
I’m sayin’!
Report thisBy PatrickHenry, July 23, 2010 at 3:15 am Link to this comment
Capt Rico,
What good for the goose is good for the gander.
Report thisBy rico, suave, July 22, 2010 at 7:18 pm Link to this comment
I noticed you changed the picture accompanying the article. Much more flattering.
PatHenry:
I posted a comment regarding the Tea Party racist flap. In it I asked, “What about the New Black Panther Party dustup?” The response I got from several of your fellow travelers was, “Quit changing the subject.”
“BTW, what ever happened to Jane Harmans offer of favors to known Israeli spies via the FBI wiretapping?”
Quit changing the subject.
Report thisBy PatrickHenry, July 22, 2010 at 4:49 pm Link to this comment
I don’t believe there is one multiple term congressperson who isn’t involved in some sort of doubledealing.
Until we reform campaign financing, our system will remain broken.
BTW, what ever happened to Jane Harmans offer of favors to known Israeli spies via the FBI wiretapping?
Report this