LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
2010 Webby Award Winner for Best Political Blog
 
May 26, 2012
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     gay marriage     barack obama     chris hedges     ndaa     robert scheer
Most Read

TED: 'A Money-Soaked Orgy of Self-Congratulatory Futurism'

Russia and Exxon Mobil Sign Arctic Oil Deal

Truthdiggers of the Week: 400,000 Canadians Launching the ‘Maple Spring’

I Can't Hear Myself Think

A Rare Admission That Money Trumps Everything Else

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
Why Bain Questions Matter
OSHA Struggles When Tower Climbers Die

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Better Than We Found It
The Good-Natured Dictator

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101

Truthdig Bazaar
Kingmakers: The Invention of the Modern Middle East

Kingmakers: The Invention of the Modern Middle East

By Karl E. Meyer and Shareen Blair Brysac
$18.45

more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Elizabeth Warren Bags $3 Million

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   

Posted on Oct 10, 2011
Charlene McBride (CC-BY)

The consumer advocate is off to a great start in her bid to defeat the other Democratic primary challengers and Massachusetts Republican Sen. Scott Brown to retake Ted Kennedy’s Senate seat. Warren raised $3 million in the last quarter—double Brown’s haul.

But Brown has been at this for much longer and, according to Reuters, already has $10.5 million in the bank.

True to her progressive appeal, Warren’s campaign is people-powered, with most of her donations coming in small amounts. That’s no surprise given how she made a name for herself watchdogging big money interests.  —PZS

Reuters:

More than 11,000 individuals in Massachusetts alone gave to Warren’s campaign, and the vast majority of the contributions were $100 or less.

The fundraising haul, which only covers a portion of the third quarter, is a strong start for Warren, who would face Republican Scott Brown in November 2012 if she wins the Democratic primary in September.

Brown’s campaign said it raised $1.55 million in the third quarter, bringing its stash on hand to $10.5 million.

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


New and Improved Comments

We are launching a major overhaul of our comments section.

In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread.

Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts.

Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with.

Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page.

anaman51's avatar

By anaman51, October 11, 2011 at 3:26 pm Link to this comment

It would please me very much to see Ms. Warren take up where Ted Kennedy left off. There’s a huge void where his dynamic liberal voice was once heard, and it needs to be replaced by one with equal or better understanding of what causes the problems in our nation. We need her voice to fill the room, to speak against what’s being done to the 99% in this country. She and her platform have my support.

Report this

By Pelham, October 11, 2011 at 3:22 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

You say most of Warren’s donations are in small
amounts. You could probably say that of nearly any
candidate, including those in the GOP. It’s the few
in number but whopping in dollar term donations that
matter. Which may be why Obama—with his enormous
obligation to the financial industry—has been such
a lousy president.

I’m not saying this is true of Warren. More
information, please. We need to know which sources
are the big contributors, even (and maybe especially)
if they are few in number.

Report this
Outraged's avatar

By Outraged, October 11, 2011 at 1:42 am Link to this comment

Re: Robespierre115

Please.

You must assume that I was born yesterday (which I
wasn’t by the way).  Your OVER THE TOP assessment
would be comical if it didn’t reek of Glen Beck. 
Bark up someone elses tree will ya. 

The “all Dems are no good” mantra won’t fly with me. 
And Elizabeth Warren is AN EXCELLENT EXAMPLE OF THAT. 
You are so bogus.

Report this
Robespierre115's avatar

By Robespierre115, October 11, 2011 at 1:17 am Link to this comment

@outraged, your naivety is touching, but at least your heart is in the right place.

When it starts looking like this, then expect many of the current celebrities and “liberals” cheering the movement on to run and hide:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hUyib7FeuF4&feature=channel_video_title

Report this
Outraged's avatar

By Outraged, October 11, 2011 at 12:34 am Link to this comment

Hopefully, THE PEOPLE have awoken.  It sure looks
that way.  And all the money in the world can’t top
that.  I think she’ll win…. by a landslide.

Good for her.  Thankfully she’s willing to step up
and fight. What is it that tells me she won’t NEED 10
million dollars to win…..?

Did you hear about the “Occupy Wall Street”
movement that is MOVING EVERYONE….......

VOTE.

Report this
David J. Cyr's avatar

By David J. Cyr, October 10, 2011 at 9:55 pm Link to this comment

QUOTE, Reuters’ article:

“The consumer advocate is off to a great start in her bid to defeat the other Democratic primary challengers… Progressive groups, including MoveOn.org, have thrown fund-raising muscle behind Warren”
___________________

It was MoveOn.org that persuaded people that Obama would bring “change” to believe in, and then predictably delivered nothing the gullible believers hoped for.

If Elizabeth Warren was real she wouldn’t be — couldn’t be — a corporate party Democrat. She wouldn’t run as a Democrat. She would stand against the two principle compromised candidates the corporate party will offer. An electorate that self-restricts itself to only electing this or that corporate party candidate is an electorate that wastes elections — an electorate that refuses to use elections for the good purposes they should be used for.

Our young are facing the prospect of human extinction. It’s time to stop advocating for consumers, and starting advocating for species survival… including our own.

http://www.chenangogreens.org

Report this
Robespierre115's avatar

By Robespierre115, October 10, 2011 at 5:35 pm Link to this comment

We need to be suspicious about these claims about politicians mostly being funded by “the people” and in “small amounts,” Obama also peddled that same bit of propaganda during his campaign. Plus we need to remain suspicious of any candidate who refuses to work outside of the two dominant, corporate-owned parties.

Report this
LostHills's avatar

By LostHills, October 10, 2011 at 4:41 pm Link to this comment

I love Elizabeth Warren, too. But this story illustrates one of the main causes of the
death of democracy in America. Political candidates should not be allowed to
solicit or accept millions of dollars of “campaign donations.” It’s bribery, and it
should be illegal. Corporations will always out spend citizens and corporate
sponsored candidates will usually win.

Report this

By croaky, October 10, 2011 at 4:18 pm Link to this comment

Elizabeth Warren is my last hope…

Report this
Newsletter

Get Truthdig in your inbox


 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2012 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.