LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman. Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
May 25, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     elizabeth warren     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

Three Questions Left Unanswered by Obama’s Counterterrorism Speech

Colbert Slams PBS for Appeasing Koch Brothers

'Left, Right & Center': Obama Ends the War on Terror

How to Make a Million Dollars an Hour

Marching in Chicago: Resisting Rahm Emanuel’s Neoliberal Savagery

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
New York City’s Summers May Heat Up

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
A Call to Action
Act of Congress

Digs

Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Cutbacks Clip U.K. Anti-Terror Effort

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Jul 2, 2010
Flickr / ICAEW Newsroom

Cabinet Office Minister Francis Maude accused the top U.K. anti-terror official of “alarmism.”

Budget worries are sparking a new debate in Britain, with spending cuts taking aim at police services in what some see as a threat to the country’s anti-terror efforts.

The country’s most senior anti-terror agent called the cutbacks “eye-watering” and said they will increase the risk of attack. —JCL

The BBC:

Britain’s most senior anti-terror officer John Yates has sparked a political row after he warned spending cuts would increase the risk of attack.

Cabinet Office Minister Francis Maude reacted angrily to Assistant Commissioner Yates’s comments, accusing him of “shroud-waving” and “alarmism”.

But Labour’s Alan Johnson warned “we will all be in greater peril” if anti-terror operations are scaled back.

The Times said Mr Yates described the planned cuts as “eye-watering”.

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By gerard, July 2, 2010 at 5:48 pm Link to this comment

Well, Britain rather takes the metaphorical morphobia medal. It would appear from the cited article that the Brits are shroud-waving in public to an eye-watering degree.  Some are even charged with shaking up Whitehall. They were apparently seized upon by the shadow Home Secretary who seems to feel that if anti-terrorism costs are not ring-fenced, Britain will go soft as a damp marshmallow.
It is to be assumed that all agencies will be ring-fenced until October when the axe will fall.
  What’s not to love?

Report this

By diamond, July 2, 2010 at 2:32 pm Link to this comment

Who cares? The whole thing is smoke and mirrors anyway and the average Briton is under more threat from the CCTV cameras that cover Britain like a fungal blight than from any terrorist. They’re more likely to be struck by lightning than die or be injured in a terrorist attack as anyone who has seen ‘7/7 Ripple Effect’ knows.

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.