Top Leaderboard, Site wide
Left Masthead
August 27, 2016
Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines
Sign up for Truthdig's Email NewsletterLike Truthdig on FacebookFollow Truthdig on TwitterSubscribe to Truthdig's RSS Feed

The Euro

Truthdig Bazaar
Wages of Rebellion

Wages of Rebellion

By Chris Hedges

Hope: A Tragedy: A Novel

Hope: A Tragedy: A Novel

By Shalom Auslander

more items

Ear to the Ground
Print this item

Don’t Push Us, Intelligence Veterans Say

Posted on Apr 23, 2013
nolifebeforecoffee (CC BY 2.0)

Intelligence experts say criticism that the FBI should have done more to catch the Tsarnaev brothers and prevent the Boston Marathon bombings could provoke government agencies to infringe civil liberties.

The comment is odd, given that entities such as the National Security Agency are operating invisibly to scoop up private digital communications, making privacy and other civil liberties already seem to be a relic of the past.

Nonetheless, investigators are being pressed to answer why they failed to prevent the bombings after receiving a tip about suspect Tamerlan Tsarnaev from Russian officials in 2011.

—Posted by Alexander Reed Kelly.

The Guardian:

“During daily threat briefings, we would look at homegrowns all the time,” [former FBI senior intelligence adviser Paul Mudd] told the Guardian. “The question is: what kind of screening do you want in place to get an American into that lense? Before you want to swing that pendulum too far: be careful.”

“If you want to guarantee we find those folks – and by the way, the FBI wouldn’t, anyway – there is only so much you can do in a open society to penetrate a closed circle,” he added during a debate at the Brookings Institution.

… But Mudd said the criticism from Washington politicians risked dragging the US down a route it did not want to go. “It’s such a misunderstanding of how national security operates. If he had not appeared in US government databases what would people have said: you missed it! When you are sitting there at the threat session every day, the threat matrix is a volume business,” he said.

“We are going to see this again, and we are going to ask ourselves: how did we fail? But before you ask that question, how are you going to boil the 10,000 people you interview down to that one case, and how are you going to deal with the 500 false positives?”

Read more

More Below the Ad


Square, Site wide

New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

Join the conversation

Load Comments
Right 1, Site wide - BlogAds Premium
Right 2, Site wide - Blogads
Right Skyscraper, Site Wide
Right Internal Skyscraper, Site wide
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network

Like Truthdig on Facebook