LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
2010 Webby Award Winner for Best Political Blog
 
February 21, 2012
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

Acts of Love

Fearful GOP May Hope for a Brokered Convention

Santorum Staffer Links Obama, Islam Via 'Slip'

Ideological Hypocrites

Bill Moyers: Attack Ads Inside and Out

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
Acts of Love
Ideological Hypocrites
The Lowdown on Fracking

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Déjà Pooh

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101

Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Do as I Say, Not as I Pay

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   

Posted on Mar 6, 2010
Wikimedia Commons

Despite the fact that Washington has forcefully discouraged investment in Iran for the past decade, the federal government has given more than $107 billion in contract payments to companies that dealt with Iran or are doing business there.

A New York Times analysis of federal records and other financial documents shows a cacophony of mixed messages to the corporate world, with Washington rewarding companies whose transactions conflict with U.S. foreign policy. —JCL

The New York Times:

The federal government has awarded more than $107 billion in contract payments, grants and other benefits over the past decade to foreign and multinational American companies while they were doing business in Iran, despite Washington’s efforts to discourage investment there, records show.

That includes nearly $15 billion paid to companies that defied American sanctions law by making large investments that helped Iran develop its vast oil and gas reserves.

For years, the United States has been pressing other nations to join its efforts to squeeze the Iranian economy, in hopes of reining in Tehran’s nuclear ambitions. Now, with the nuclear standoff hardening and Iran rebuffing American diplomatic outreach, the Obama administration is trying to win a tough new round of United Nations sanctions.

But a New York Times analysis of federal records, company reports and other documents shows that both the Obama and Bush administrations have sent mixed messages to the corporate world when it comes to doing business in Iran, rewarding companies whose commercial interests conflict with American security goals.

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By Nap, March 7, 2010 at 8:20 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Well, cutting off one’s nose in spite of one’s face is not cheap, specially if you where to factor in all the business and respect lost, 107 billion seems a bit pressed and pressured.

Report this
Paul_GA's avatar

By Paul_GA, March 7, 2010 at 4:54 am Link to this comment

The Future of Freedom Foundation has an article entitled “U.S. Government Confirms Sanctions Don’t Work”:

http://www.fff.org/blog/jghblog2010-03-05.asp

Since many of the companies mentioned in the Times article are in fact American, one is also reminded of the old couplet from Sir John Harrington:

“Treason doth never prosper; what’s the reason?
For if it prosper, none dare call it treason.”

Report this

By gerard, March 6, 2010 at 7:58 pm Link to this comment

PS:  However, I suspect things are stirring here and there.  Things are just getting too crazy even for capitalists. Somehor I can’t imagine them being happy sailing their yachts through a fog of hot fallout.

Report this

By gerard, March 6, 2010 at 4:22 pm Link to this comment

The interlocking of more or less disparate business organizations and national governments is rapidly leading to a morass of confusion with few or no ethical guidelines. I wonder how much longer we can go without some common agreement on basic principles of restraint and compassion.  Many people think that capitalistic enterprises care nothing about ethics etc., but it would seem that the pressure to preserve life on earth would push in the direction of a basic agreement. The UN would be a place to begin.  Does anyone know of any such activities?
I found one reference to a “UN Global Compact Leaders Summit 2010.” But no details beyond intentions.

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!






                        Number of characters remaining: 4000

Are you a human? Retype the word you see here.

     

Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

Newsletter

Get Truthdig in your inbox


 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2012 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.