LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman. Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
May 19, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     elizabeth warren     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

Truthdigger of the Week: Sen. Angus King

Letter From Birmingham Jail

Chilling: Arctic Tundra ‘Will Turn to Forest’

'The Daily Show': Stewart Slams Hypocrites Cheney and Rumsfeld

'Left, Right & Center': The White House Scandal Trifecta

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
Chilling: Arctic Tundra ‘Will Turn to Forest’
How the IRS’ Nonprofit Division Got So Dysfunctional

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Act of Congress
Daily Rituals
The Girls of Atomic City

Digs

Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Dismal Reports From Two U.S. Inequality Studies

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Oct 29, 2011
Akibubblet (CC-BY)

Bronze sculptures depicting urchins with bags of money are found in the subway station at 14th Street and 8th Avenue in New York City.

The 1 percenters targeted by those leading the Wall Street occupation had a profitable run between 1979 and 2007. Their average after-tax income grew 275 percent in that period, while income for the 60 percent of the population in the middle of the earning scale grew by just under 40 percent.

That’s the news from a report published by the Congressional Budget Office this month. Researchers said an increase in the share of income coming from capital gains—profits made on investments—played a substantial role in the overall increase. And of course, all of this occurred during the period in which participation in the derivatives market—the favorite golden goose of modern investors—grew astronomically.

Meanwhile, German researchers ranked the U.S. as the 27th least “socially just” country out of the 31 member states of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development—a group whose stated goal is the stimulation of global economic progress and trade between nations. Greece, Chile, Mexico and Turkey filled the last four spots on the chart.

The U.S. scored lower than the OECD average on more than half of the measures, taking 29th in “poverty prevention,” 20th in “access to education,” 16th in “labor market inclusion,” 16th in “social cohesion and nondiscrimination,” 23rd in “health” and 20th in “intergenerational justice,” which attempts to measure whether an earlier generation inhibits or enables later generations’ access to education, employment and general health.

The Northern European states, which include Iceland, Norway, Denmark, Sweden and Finland, were deemed the most socially just countries in the OECD by far.

For a brief explanation on how the “Social Justice Index” works and why the U.S. scored so poorly, read this interview by Justin Elliott of Salon, who spoke with Daniel Schraad-Tischler, the author of the study. —Alexander Reed Kelly

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By Manny Kohigan, November 28, 2011 at 6:33 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

OK.  Now I’m upset.  I can’t add anything to the simple, brutally direct comments of:
berniem, October 31 at 1:01 pm
And I quote him/her verbatim (because it beard repeating)

“Nothing will change because a sizeable portion of the population of this nation is scared and stupid. Scared because if income was more evenly distributed those “other” people may be elevated to an equal social status; and stupid because if laws governing taxation and other means of wealth accumulation were made more equitable, they may lose out when it becomes their turn to “hit the jackpot”. This is the legacy of the woefully misnamed “Greatest Generation”.”

Report this

By berniem, October 31, 2011 at 2:01 pm Link to this comment

Nothing will change because a sizeable portion of the population of this nation is scared and stupid. Scared because if income was more evenly distributed those “other” people may be elevated to an equal social status; and stupid because if laws governing taxation and other means of wealth accumulation were made more equitable, they may lose out when it becomes their turn to “hit the jackpot”. This is the legacy of the woefully misnamed “Greatest Generation”.

Report this
Lafayette's avatar

By Lafayette, October 30, 2011 at 3:49 am Link to this comment

SOCIAL JUSTICE

Nice piece of work (by the OECD).

It supports, however, what has been known for quite some time. Economists have employed the Gini Coefficient to track Income Inequality (or Unfairness) for quite some time.

The Gini Coefficient that depicts both historically the level of Income Unfairness by country can be found here. What can we learn from that info-graphic?  [Note that up is bad (towards more unfairness) and down is good (towards less unfairness) in terms of Gini Coefficients.]

First off all, that since the magical year of 1980 (when Reckless Ronnie was elected) our Income Unfairness has gone to hell in a hand-basket. From 1950 onwards it trends slightly downwards, when in 1980 it suddenly inflexed oppositely - gaining about 8 points on its upward swing.

What else can we learn? Once upon a time we had a Gini Coefficient that was on the high end of a range around 30 to 35 wherein lay most of the European countries. In fact, the European countries, where Social Justice is of high concern, maintained their Gini Coefficients within a tight band.

What is Social Justice? It is the mechanism by which there exists an Incomes Policy that generally means the more you earn the much more you are taxed. And the Tax Revenues are disbursed by means of:
* First-class Universal National HealthCare Systems (which cost about a third of our private enterprise insurance), as well as
* Postsecondary Education that gives their workforce the skill-sets necessary nowadays to find a decent job (meaning tertiary schooling at a university, college or vocational school is not free but nearly so) - which means that fewer kids are left behind and they do not graduate with an enormous debt hanging around their necks,
* High-speed trains that spew less pollution into the atmosphere than commercial jet aircraft, and
* Subsidized housing for first-time buyers that installs a couple in decent accommodations within which to found and nurture their families (without generating a SubPrime Mess that brings their nation to its knees).

And, most importantly, no silly wars that cost an arm and leg whilst bringing dead and maimed soldiers home to their families.

MY POINT

The above constitute the main elements of a progressive “Social Justice” program, which were implemented by a political class that listened to its constituency clamoring to have all those Public Services. Or they did not get elected. (Get it?)

And if we, the sheeple, do not demand and obtain the same, then we will never have them either. (Get that?)

It’s really quite simple ...

POST SCRIPTUM

The “Gini” is no magic. It refers to Corrado Gini who was the Italian statistician who devised the method.

Report this
Outraged's avatar

By Outraged, October 29, 2011 at 10:19 pm Link to this comment

In a bizarre way this is almost laughable…....we know
this, a whole bunch of people, like MILLIONS of people know this,
they’re called Americans.

The good thing is, now we have the proof, in
black and white that is. I only needed to look in my wallet and look at their house.

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.