LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
2010 Webby Award Winner for Best Political Blog
 
May 26, 2012
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     gay marriage     barack obama     chris hedges     ndaa     robert scheer
Most Read

TED: 'A Money-Soaked Orgy of Self-Congratulatory Futurism'

Russia and Exxon Mobil Sign Arctic Oil Deal

Truthdiggers of the Week: 400,000 Canadians Launching the ‘Maple Spring’

I Can't Hear Myself Think

A Rare Admission That Money Trumps Everything Else

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
Why Bain Questions Matter
OSHA Struggles When Tower Climbers Die

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Better Than We Found It
The Good-Natured Dictator

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101

Truthdig Bazaar
When Skateboards Will Be Free

When Skateboards Will Be Free

By Saïd Sayrafiezadeh
$14.96

more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Disappointment in Rhode Island

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   

Posted on Jun 30, 2011
Flickr / mediacutts

A logo for the marriage equality campaign in Rhode Island.

Same-sex couples suffered a bitter legislative defeat in Rhode Island on Wednesday night when a bill allowing only civil unions—but not marriage—passed the state Senate, less than one week after New York granted gays and lesbians the right to marry.

The prospects for gay marriage had looked good over the past year, with Gordon D. Fox, the openly gay speaker of the Democratic-controlled state House of Representatives, and independent Gov. Lincoln Chafee supporting a marriage bill. Critics of Wednesday’s action are unhappy because civil unions do not give couples the full legal rights granted by married status, saying that they “establish a second-class citizenry.” —ARK

The New York Times:

Less than a week after same-sex marriage was legalized in New York, the Rhode Island State Senate on Wednesday evening approved a bill allowing not marriage, but civil unions for gay couples, despite fierce opposition from gay rights advocates who called the legislation discriminatory.

The bill, which already passed in the state’s House of Representatives and which the governor said he was likely to sign, grants gay and lesbian couples most of the rights and benefits that Rhode Island provides married couples. It was offered as a compromise this spring after Gordon D. Fox, the openly gay speaker of the Democratic-controlled House, said he could not muster enough votes to pass a same-sex marriage bill.

... Gay rights advocates say the bill is unacceptable because it allows religious organizations not to recognize the unions. For example, they say, a Catholic hospital could choose not to allow a lesbian to make medical decisions on behalf of her partner, and a Catholic university could deny family medical leave to gay employees.

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


New and Improved Comments

We are launching a major overhaul of our comments section.

In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread.

Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts.

Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with.

Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page.

DavidByron's avatar

By DavidByron, July 1, 2011 at 8:18 am Link to this comment

As defeats go that really doesn’t sound very bitter.
At all.

Report this

By TDoff, July 1, 2011 at 6:56 am Link to this comment

ITW, you’re reading too much into my comments. I am a marriageophobic schmuck, neither a heterophobic nor a homophobic one. The concept of either the government’s or a church’s blessing being essential for a union between humans is ridiculous, especially in view of the current state of both the government and religions. Both would be utterly superfluous if they did not wield such power over our lives, both are hypocritically corrupt, and their corruption will continue for so long as we permit it. I’m all for the freedom of f*****g with anyone we want to who wants us, but believe we should concentrate on f*****g, by any means necessary, our current government and religions until the first is corrected, and the second, eliminated.

Report this

By Inherit The Wind, June 30, 2011 at 4:20 pm Link to this comment

TDoff:
Stop trying so hard to sound like a homophobic schmuck.  You’re doing too good a job.

The GLBT, IMHO, is fully entitled to the same legal partnership as “straights”.  But TACTICALLY (and I emphasize that word) they’ve gone about it all wrong, learning NOTHING from the legal challenges led by Thurgood Marshall against Southern Segregation. 

Instead, they went for the whole enchilada, never realizing it would SLOW the process down and give the right wing intolerant religious fanatics motivation.

Building Civil Unions in state after state, challenging the ACTUAL differences between “Marriage” and “Civil Union” (without going for the word “Marriage”) would have gotten them there far faster and with a far stronger legal foundation.

Sun-Tzu wrote that to achieve victory, first make yourself undefeatable.  The legal challenges have violated this strategic principle.

Now ever attempt at Civil Unions and “worse” Marriage motivates and mobilizes those who think it’s their business, indeed their RIGHT, to determine what genitalia the members of such a Union must possess.

Yet every state that accepts Civil Unions brings us closer to the day when happily consenting adults will be no different in their Unions whether they are GLBT, or Hetero.

Report this

By TDoff, June 30, 2011 at 3:05 pm Link to this comment

The main advantage gay marriages have over heterosexual marriages, is that both partners agree on the preferred position of the toilet seat.

Report this

By TDoff, June 30, 2011 at 2:59 pm Link to this comment

Rhode Island gays should settle down and concentrate on their main problem. Not that they cannot legally be married, but that the legislature has decreed that their unions must be civil.

Can you imagine trying to spend a lifetime with someone of the same sex, seeing each other day after day, going through all the hassles of a heterosexual marriage, including the sexual controversies, disagreements, disappointments, and infidelities…and keeping the relationship ‘civil’?!

Report this
Newsletter

Get Truthdig in your inbox


 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2012 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.