LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
2010 Webby Award Winner for Best Political Blog
 
May 26, 2012
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     gay marriage     barack obama     chris hedges     ndaa     robert scheer
Most Read

TED: 'A Money-Soaked Orgy of Self-Congratulatory Futurism'

Russia and Exxon Mobil Sign Arctic Oil Deal

Truthdiggers of the Week: 400,000 Canadians Launching the ‘Maple Spring’

I Can't Hear Myself Think

A Rare Admission That Money Trumps Everything Else

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
Why Bain Questions Matter
OSHA Struggles When Tower Climbers Die

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Better Than We Found It
The Good-Natured Dictator

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101

Truthdig Bazaar
Sahel: The End of the Road

Sahel: The End of the Road

By Orville Schell (Afterword), Sebastiao Salgado (Foreword)
$45.00

more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Terror Suspect Wins Round in Court

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   

Posted on Jul 4, 2010
ENTER_ALT_TEXT
Wikimedia Commons

A photo of Belkacem Bensayah is included in a U.S. government dossier.

An appeals court in D.C. has sided with an Algerian detainee, Belkacern Bensayah, finding that since there was no direct communication between Bensayah and al-Qaida, he could not be considered part of a terrorist group.

The decision sends Bensayah’s case back for reconsideration by the district court judge who in 2008 ruled that he could be held indefinitely without trial. It also calls into question the way the Obama administration classifies suspected terrorists. —JCL

The New York Times:

A federal appeals court has sided with a Guantánamo prisoner whose case prompted a major internal argument among Obama administration legal advisers last year over how broadly to define terrorism suspects who may be detained without trial.

Belkacem Bensayah, an Algerian who was arrested in Bosnia in 2001 and accused of helping people who wanted to travel to Afghanistan and join Al Qaeda, cannot be considered part of the terrorist organization based on the evidence the government presented against him, a panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit has ruled.

“The government presented no direct evidence of actual communication between Bensayah and any Al Qaeda member, much less evidence suggesting Bensayah communicated with” anyone else to facilitate travel by an Al Qaeda member, Judge Douglas H. Ginsburg wrote in a 17-page opinion that was declassified late last week. Parts of the ruling were censored by the government.

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


New and Improved Comments

We are launching a major overhaul of our comments section.

In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread.

Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts.

Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with.

Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page.

By TheHandyman, July 5, 2010 at 12:30 pm Link to this comment

Finally, some actual Justice meted out by an American Court! So much for the Hope that Obama would bring Change to the way we are treating prisoners and such. President Abysmal continues to say one thing all the while continuing the Bush policies so that it just seems like Bush is still sitting in the White House say stupid shit!

Report this

By diamond, July 4, 2010 at 12:29 pm Link to this comment

Another hapless victim of America’s years of Bush/Cheney madness.

Report this
kerryrose's avatar

By kerryrose, July 4, 2010 at 9:10 am Link to this comment

Wow.  Did this guy actually get justice in the hysterical ‘war on terror?’

Report this

By bogi666, July 4, 2010 at 5:42 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

just the thought qualifies as criminal conduct. Furthermore, the subject being charged does not even have to provide the thought, the Thought Police can determine the thought that they think the subject is having or going to have so as to preempt the thought being thought that the Thought Police think is going to happen. Foolish you think, the Chicago 7 were incarcerated because they were accused of carrying a thought over a state line into Chicago.

Report this
Newsletter

Get Truthdig in your inbox


 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2012 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.