|
|||
|
Terror Suspect Wins Round in CourtPosted on Jul 4, 2010
An appeals court in D.C. has sided with an Algerian detainee, Belkacern Bensayah, finding that since there was no direct communication between Bensayah and al-Qaida, he could not be considered part of a terrorist group. The decision sends Bensayah’s case back for reconsideration by the district court judge who in 2008 ruled that he could be held indefinitely without trial. It also calls into question the way the Obama administration classifies suspected terrorists. —JCL
Advertisement Previous item: Obama Channels Bush in Speech on Immigration Next item: Oil Companies Awash in Subsidies New and Improved CommentsWe are launching a major overhaul of our comments section. In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread. Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts. Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with. Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page. |
By TheHandyman, July 5, 2010 at 12:30 pm Link to this comment
Finally, some actual Justice meted out by an American Court! So much for the Hope that Obama would bring Change to the way we are treating prisoners and such. President Abysmal continues to say one thing all the while continuing the Bush policies so that it just seems like Bush is still sitting in the White House say stupid shit!
Report thisBy diamond, July 4, 2010 at 12:29 pm Link to this comment
Another hapless victim of America’s years of Bush/Cheney madness.
Report thisBy kerryrose, July 4, 2010 at 9:10 am Link to this comment
Wow. Did this guy actually get justice in the hysterical ‘war on terror?’
Report thisBy bogi666, July 4, 2010 at 5:42 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
just the thought qualifies as criminal conduct. Furthermore, the subject being charged does not even have to provide the thought, the Thought Police can determine the thought that they think the subject is having or going to have so as to preempt the thought being thought that the Thought Police think is going to happen. Foolish you think, the Chicago 7 were incarcerated because they were accused of carrying a thought over a state line into Chicago.
Report this