LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.Best Political Blog Winner, 2007 Webby Awards, People's Voice and Jury.   Boots on the Ground by Dusk: My Tribute to Pat Tillman, By Mary Tillman with Narda Zacchino
 
July 24, 2008
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Reports
Obama on the Brink
No Easy Out for Obama
 * NEW! * Refighting the Vietnam War

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture

Digs
Inside the Data Mine

Truthdig Bazaar
In Reckless Hands

In Reckless Hands

By Victoria Nourse
$16.47

In the Hot Zone

In the Hot Zone

By Kevin Sites
$15.95

more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Dems Didn’t Take a Dime From Abramoff, Dean Says

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Jan 9, 2006

DailyKos:  Not a single Dem took Abramoff money. Democrats have to set the record straight one misinformed person at a time. Dean took point on Wolf Blitzer:

BLITZER: Should Democrats who took money from Jack Abramoff, who has now pleaded guilty to bribery charges, among other charges, a Republican lobbyist in Washington, should the Democrat who took money from him give that money to charity or give it back?

DEAN: There are no Democrats who took money from Jack Abramoff, not one, not one single Democrat. Every person named in this scandal is a Republican. Every person under investigation is a Republican. Every person indicted is a Republican. This is a Republican finance scandal. There is no evidence that Jack Abramoff ever gave any Democrat any money. And we’ve looked through all of those FEC reports to make sure that’s true. | more

Email Newsletter

Get truth delivered to your inbox every week.

Previous item: Poll: Most Want Court OK For Gov't Wiretaps

Next item: Ex-Top Soldier: Impeach Blair Over Iraq

Jump to Comments

Advertisement


Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By me, January 9, 2006 at 8:26 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

damn it is just amazing how you have it all figured out, that everything was legal, even before the trials even begin!  if only I had such insight.

1/3 of it went to Democrats?  Which of his cronies did this?  To paraphrase Dean, are you saying the Indian tribe who gave Reid money was an agent of Abramoff?  They got screwed by him.  They weren’t in cahoots with him.

Get your talking points straight next time.

Good lord, 1/3 went to Democrats.  LOL

Report this

By cwilson, January 9, 2006 at 1:42 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Dean told one of those “Washington Lies,” by which I mean that he spoke the truth in the narrow sense but deliberately left a misimpression. You know, sort of like when Clinton said he never had “sexual relations” with that woman, Miz Lewinsky? It’s true that he didn’t—at the time, Webster’s defined “sexual relations” as coitus, which didn’t occur. But that was a dodge and everyone knew it. Not that they wanted him impeached, either.

Anyway, this is a matter that every 5th grader can understand: 10% of the iceberg floats above water. Abramoff ran a corrupt keiretsu—a crony network—that “contrbuted” $4.4 million. ALL of the contributions were legal. Abramoff’s personal contributions were 5% of the total and they all went to Republicans. His cronies gave the rest of the money, and one-third of it went to Democrats.

Here is the proof. This scandal is just the latest in a long line of scandals involving The Permanent K Street Government. It’s a baronial system of lobbies—Big Agriculture, Big Pharma, Big Telecom/Tech, Pro-Israel, Big Entertainment, Big Labor, Big Defense, among others—that owns both parties lock, stock and barrel.

The Republicans have always been willing to sell out. It’s in their genetic code. But the Democrats had a 40-year run where they weren’t willing to sell out. That end sometime in the late 1970s, and ever since then the Democratic Party has progressively (bad word) sold its soul for corporate money.

A “Republican scandal?” Yeah, right. And I just think I sprout wings and fly to Venus this Thursday. Who do they think they’re kidding? Forty years ago, three-quarters of the public voted. Now it’s half. That means that in any national election, about 50 million voters and MIA. Who are they, and why are they missing in action?

I say they are people at the socio-economic margins who watch both parties focus their exclusive attention on people with money. As a result, every election has a declining rate of participation. The public is progressively giving up hope, and I think it’s largely because the Democrats have abandoned their principles.

If the Democratic Party refuses to stand up for working Americans, it can expect to batlle harder and harder for a diminishing supply of crumbs from Big Business.

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!






Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

Newsletter

Get Truthdig in your inbox

Privacy Policy

 
Click here to advertise with Truthdig
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2008 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.