|
|
June 19, 2013
|
|
Damage Control, Romney StylePosted on Feb 3, 2012
Although Mitt Romney owned, in an interview with Nevada journalist Jon Ralston on Thursday, that he “misspoke” the day before in saying he was “not concerned about the very poor,” the presidential candidate might not have much wiggle room amid a speed-fueled news cycle and a chilly Rick Santorum standing watch. Also, Soledad O’Brien ain’t buying it. —KA Watch Ralston’s interview with Romney following the excerpt below.
“Face to Face With Jon Ralston”:
Advertisement Previous item: Quarterly Profit Takes a Tumble at NYT Next item: Employment Numbers Get an Unexpected Bump in January New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By BrooklynDame, February 4, 2012 at 1:54 pm Link to this comment
Sorry, Mitt…you can’t unring this bell. Not that it matters, really—it’s incredible
that he has as many supporters as he does.
http://borderlessnewsandviews.com/
Report thisBy Blueokie, February 4, 2012 at 9:21 am Link to this comment
How will Thurston Howell III Trump this? Personally I’m withholding support unless he secures the all important endorsements of the Kardasians, the Real Housewives, and the cast of Jersey Shore.
Report thisBy hidflect, February 4, 2012 at 4:15 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
On all the blog and news site comment postings I’ve read (not ALL left/progressive) I haven’t seen one word of praise for Romney. Which is bad. It means Obama isn’t going to feel pushed at all. So it’s 4 more years of Larry Summers, Eric Holder and Timmy Geitner clones. 5% change as The Young Turks’ Cenk Uyger puts it. Not to mention blind eyes on The Fed and the Banksters. The GOP has failed their task to be any kind of reasonable opposition and ironically the Left will pay the price.
Report thisBy Ted Whitney, February 3, 2012 at 7:40 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Romney is a cartoon, as are/were the majority of his opponents.
Report thisBy Maani, February 3, 2012 at 6:08 pm Link to this comment
Two of the best thins I’ve read on this:
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/02/opinion/collins-mitt-speaks-oh-no.html?partner=rssnyt&emc=rss
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/03/opinion/krugman-romney-isnt-concerned.html?ref=opinion
Report thisBy gerard, February 3, 2012 at 5:05 pm Link to this comment
“Misspoke”? Give me a break! What really happened was that unconsciously he slipped and revealed his
Report thislifelong sentiments by mistake. It is quite possible that no millionaire is much interested in poor people. Their universally neglectful behavior clearly indicates it.
At the present moment they have a golden opportunity to disprove my contention by getting together and offering, for example, a practical plan for stopping and reversing the flow of cash from the 99% to the 1%. So far, such a move is conspicuous by its complete and utter absence.
Nobody is even seriously suggesting that a few of them put together a “retreat” in the Cayman Islands for the purpose of suggesting ways to relieve any of the sufferings of their fellow human beings. Silence speaks louder than words, doesn’t it?