|
|||
|
Congressional Panel Looks Into Safety Mechanism Glitch in Oil SpillPosted on May 12, 2010
The scale of the oil spill disaster in the Gulf of Mexico might have been better contained had a safety device designed to help in situations like the one that caused the enormous mess performed properly, according to findings presented to the House Energy and Commerce Committee on Wednesday. —KA
Advertisement Previous item: Palin to Churn Out Another Tome of Down-Home Wisdom Next item: Republicans Take a Pass on Arizona New and Improved CommentsWe are launching a major overhaul of our comments section. In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread. Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts. Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with. Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page. |
By rollzone, May 13, 2010 at 1:10 pm Link to this comment
hello. why the noncommittal doublespeak? wouldn’t you like to hear plain English? what did you mean by “better contained”? a hydraulic failure may occur from stresses occurring outside any engineering parameter. we can not build to withstand that amount of force. i want to know why a secondary backup safety plan, for drilling in such deep waters, was not in place? a little bureaucratic redundancy to err on the side of ecology? some entirely different emergency reaction to close off the well? an environmental safeguard?
Report this