LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
2010 Webby Award Winner for Best Political Blog
 
May 26, 2012
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     gay marriage     barack obama     ndaa     robert scheer     chris hedges
Most Read

TED: 'A Money-Soaked Orgy of Self-Congratulatory Futurism'

Russia and Exxon Mobil Sign Arctic Oil Deal

Truthdiggers of the Week: 400,000 Canadians Launching the ‘Maple Spring’

I Can't Hear Myself Think

A Rare Admission That Money Trumps Everything Else

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
Why Bain Questions Matter
OSHA Struggles When Tower Climbers Die

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Better Than We Found It
The Good-Natured Dictator

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101

Truthdig Bazaar
Obama’s Wars

Obama’s Wars

By Bob Woodward
$15.00

If I Were Another: Poems

If I Were Another: Poems

By Mahmoud Darwish
$20.44

more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Climate Change and America’s Deadly National Parks

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   

Posted on Sep 19, 2011
Flickr / Koshyk

Eighteen people have died this year at Yosemite National Park.

After learning that tourist deaths in Yosemite National Park increased this season compared with a typical year, Mother Jones reporter Kiera Butler asks whether the events that are rearranging the Earth’s climate might be the culprit.

Scientists are unwilling to label climate change as the direct cause of the lives lost by environmental alterations, such as faster-moving, higher-volume river water. But they are paying attention to the connection between rising temperatures and hazardous conditions. A 2006 report by the Natural Resources Defense Council found that in wilderness areas in the American West, unusually high temperatures led to heat waves, insect infestations, increased storms and flooding. Elsewhere this year, at Virginia’s Colonial National Historical Park, rising sea levels forced officials to move a lighthouse building twice. —ARK

Mother Jones:

Earlier this summer, a few friends and I went on a backpacking trip in Yosemite National Park. We had been told that the waterfalls were especially spectacular this year, on account of the spring melt of an unusually large snowpack. We were unprepared for just how impressive the rushing water would be. On our first day, we came to a bridge over the formidable Wapama Falls. White water poured over the railings, making the floor slick and dousing us as we scampered across. About a week after we got home, two hikers had died crossing the same bridge.

That was just the beginning of a very deadly summer in Yosemite. So far this season, 18 people have died in the park, way up from the 12 or so who die in a typical year. Thinking about the tragedies got me wondering: Could climate change be playing a role in making outdoor recreation more dangerous? And if it’s not now, then might it in the future?

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


New and Improved Comments

We are launching a major overhaul of our comments section.

In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread.

Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts.

Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with.

Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page.

By Deborah, September 21, 2011 at 6:45 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Nature is not Disneyworld. On the remote mountainside where I live in Peru, two indigenous locals have fallen recently; one died from her injuries and the other was badly injured.

As for climate change, potato varieties are dying out in the highlands, and our rainy season appears to have arrived two months early this year.

Report this
David J. Cyr's avatar

By David J. Cyr, September 20, 2011 at 4:49 pm Link to this comment

QUOTE, SNAP spokesperson:

“I’d like to point out that in Alaska, there are many government entities taking climate change seriously, as we are on the forefront of change. We may not all agree on the cause, but there is a general consensus that change is occurring because we typically live closer to the land and we see it.”
_______________________

Observant and sentient people who live close to the land anywhere (not just in the worst effected places) have been noticing the changes. Forest destructive timber caterpillars used to be a periodic temporary problem for a year or two here in the Catskill Mountains and then not return for many years, allowing the trees to reinvigorate themselves before the next attack. Now they’ve become a permanent problem, and like a cancer they seem determined to eventually kill their host. We just had two 1 in 500 year probability floods just a few weeks apart and at the end of Summer, not in the Spring. We get crop destructive hail storms before harvest time now. We’re regularly getting far more rain here than we want, while other regions desperately needing rain are getting none. Meanwhile, Halliburton’s frackers are coming here to permanently remove pure water from the natural water cycle and pollute the air, soil, waterways and watersheds of rural people not important to the City of Thieves (NYC) to rip tiny remnants of gas from stone (an environmentally insane process that the popular with Republicans Democrat governor’s energy policy and short-sighted economic austerity policy is near wholly dependent upon).

Yes, there are plenty of scientists, both in government and non-government agencies, documenting the acceleration of climate change and providing forecasts to assess the probabilities of whom will be effected where, in which way, and by how much. They provide advisories. They don’t determine what will be done.

Our collective people problem is that a near unanimous (99% R & D) supermajority of the electorate keeps providing popular mandates for the policy priorities of America, Inc. to be solely determined by corporate persons… sociopathic organizations.

If the evolving catastrophic climate change were being seriously treated with appropriate priority, by a human (and other species) condition concerned government, then, instead of permanently waging resource wars America’s globe dominating military would be disbanded, with all the person power and funding wasted there put to good purpose to earnestly and energetically provide a maximum effort to reverse or mitigate the adverse effects of climate change.

Note that, when the corporate party’s liberal Democrats had full official control of all the levers of power in both the Executive Branch and Congress, Obama’s EPA (Environmental Polluters’ Agency) briefly halted permits for Mountaintop Removal to “study” whether it might possibly have seriously adverse environmental effects… and then quickly MovedOn to continue permitting it, because Mountaintop Removal becomes “sustainable economic development” when Democrats permit it.

Anyone here really think the tar sands Keystone XL pipeline is going to be stopped by Obama whose “Justice” Department sought a 10 year prison term and $750,000 fine to persecute Tim DeChristopher, or be stopped by the EPA that regulates environmentalists to protect polluters?

The Goldman Sachs faction of the corporate party (Democrats) plan for climate change is to provide a market to profit from pollution swaps, while the glaciers all melt, the permafrost becomes impermanent, and our human habitable planet becomes uninhabitable for humans.

If the young don’t rise up soon and push their parents’ My Generation aside — with extreme prejudice — they won’t have a future worth having.

http://www.chenangogreens.org

Report this

By Scenarios Network For Alaska & Arctic Planning, September 20, 2011 at 12:11 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I hear the board’s collective frustration, and my comment is a tangent, but in response to David Cyr’s remark above “The only part of the government of America Inc. that’s seriously planning for climate change is the Pentagon.” I’d like to point out that in Alaska, there are many government entities taking climate change seriously, as we are on the forefront of change. We may not all agree on the cause, but there is a general consensus that change is occurring because we typically live closer to the land and we see it.

Check out http://www.snap.uaf.edu, and http://www.accap.uaf.edu and the NOAA RISA Program in your area, for examples of work collaborative work happening now: http://www.climate.noaa.gov/cpo_pa/risa/

Related to National Parks, The Scenarios Network for Alaska & Arctic Planning (SNAP), in partnership with the Wilderness Society & the Park service created climate summary reports for each region & National Parks, Preserves and Monuments, describing potential future temperature and precipitation for 2040 and 2080 as compared to historical values, a 1961-1990 climatology. Additionally, SNAP is conducting a series of climate change scenario planning workshops in each region.

Report this
David J. Cyr's avatar

By David J. Cyr, September 20, 2011 at 10:00 am Link to this comment

Dying while hiking in the wilderness is a far better death than most people ever have… certainly better than dying in a hospital.

The only part of the government of America Inc. that’s seriously planning for climate change is the Pentagon.

In the Climate Wars currently be planned for, “natural catastrophes” will be weaponized — used as an effective means of exterminating enormous numbers of poor people considered global Market-State expendable.

The reason government isn’t taking climate change seriously is obvious. Those who have the means to accomplish it are surely planning to use a Final Solution to just in time eliminate Nature’s people problem… with the expectation that the most privileged few will then live happily ever after with far more resources to sustainably share among far fewer people.

http://www.chenangogreens.org

Report this

By Dave L., September 20, 2011 at 9:31 am Link to this comment

The wilderness is not Disneyland. Nature cares not for fools. There are no do-overs when you take risks. Be prepared for the consequences. Does it really matter if the raging water that was rushing under the bridge was caused by a warming climate or an unusually high snow pack ? If the situation was unsafe then those people shouldn’t have taken it upon themselves to cross.

Report this

By SoTexGuy, September 20, 2011 at 2:53 am Link to this comment

Hear! Hear! wedemay!

Report this
wedemay's avatar

By wedemay, September 19, 2011 at 4:05 pm Link to this comment

Death in the Wilderness is not new to Americans, just Americans of this generation. We have allowed ourselves to become disconnected voyeurs of
the wreckage of nature and tend to not realize potential danger. Wilderness is supposed to be dangerous and we in tern are respectful of nature. Most of the people who die in the wilderness do so becuase they made assumptions based in a different paradigm, one of the urban environment. When your running trails or trying to rescue someone drowning it’s wise to remember your likely to die also. Wilderness does not come with safety rails and warning lights and crossing a raging waterfall is easily a life challenging action.

In the disintegration of meaning, culture, and the wild we project evil upon nature which should not be attempted to be Dammed, controlled or disrespected.

It is our very lack of relationship with nature that leads to the death of the environment and eventually humanity. Nature will recover eventually, if we stop soon enough and leave it alone.

Stop the logging and mine development in National Parks !  Enjoy and be careful !

Report this
Newsletter

Get Truthdig in your inbox


 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2012 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.