From my view, there has been an increase in such folk whose “passage” was underwritten by the “company,” which folk are endlessly involved in repaying the debt.  Which is never repaid. 

Recently, a few supreme court judge types have shown up.  Which types the company
bennies help to forget why their fathers ran away from the family.  Not for lack of love, but due to shame, the feeling of failure and subjugation, with no hope. Superficially, the bennies also assist these folk to almost forget the denigraded life their loving mammas managed to exist through, til they crossed over to meet their “Maker,” some of whom departed gratefully.

In spite of company bennies and blonde hair of some wives, the internal dissonance never departs these folk, and they are just as trapped as their fathers. However, the systemic dishonesty and deceit they reinforce caused their fathers to run away, and made life miserable for their loving mammas.  And now, they are part of the problem.  Heaven help them.

Two of the worst U.S. Sup.Ct. Justices in recent memory have been Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas. They are both dishonest, destructive Justices.

Both men, and especially Thomas, should be impeached for dishonesty.

Clarence Thomas is on the U.S. Supreme Court but he can’t understand filing instructions for a “LEGALLY required financial disclosure form”?

Get this joker OFF the Court before he does even more harm to this country.

” We all know nothing is gonna happen to dear Clarence” 
By Steve E, January 27 at 6:30 am

Disagree.
Basing his situation on USGov politics, and historical
pattern, he will receive some type of promotion.

poor, dim witted queenie; you’re sounding like whacko
swerve`.
poor, dim witted swerve`; between a republican and a
hard place.

...Charlie Rangel…

well, well - they should at least share the same fate, if not the indignity of a public
trial - at the very least, a complaint should be drawn and served

the complaint should focus on the Heritage Foundation and Gini Thomas working
in conspiracy to bribe a seated Federal Judge of the Supreme Court

to consult, or whatever her duties were, for a 501(c)3, public benefit corporation,
that is well known as a servant to the promotion of monied interests, $172,500
per annum… an ‘honorarium’ is not

common, Rico, show the sense with which you were born

What does it tell you about our ever changing tax code when a supreme court justice can’t figure it out?

The article states, “Until 1996, Thomas included his wife’s income on his
disclosure forms”. So what happened then Clarence, gray matter meltdown? This
perverted corporate stooge slithered to the bench after testimony from a very
courageous Anita Hill who warned us all we needed to know about Clarence before
he filled the role as a token African American Supreme and right wing water boy.
Then years later his dollar sucking wife decided to bring the whole matter up
again regarding Anita Hill and got lambasted by another witness to Clarence’s
transgressions who backed Anita’s story, now this. It must be terribly
embarrassing to say the least at all the shmoozy cocktail parties and glitzy formal
dinners in Washington when Clarence and his charming wife are in attendance. I
guess all that money eases the pain. May you and your wife get caught with a
German Sheperd some day soon, numbnuts

At best a pompous and dogmatic ideologue suffering from Stockholm Syndrome. More than likely Thomas is a Quisling not only to his heritage but also to a system that helped him attain a status he could only have dreamed of had the reactionaries he now so fondly embraces been dominant during his formative years. The man is an intellectual lightweight Peter Principled to an exalted position which he now thinks places him above the responsibilities of mere mortals. This shill for the plutocrats and oligarchs who play him like a poorly tuned honky-tonk piano not only violated Anita Hill but also the Blind Lady Justice and should be granted the distinction of impeachment before he further destroys our constitution in league with Scalia, Alito, and Roberts who should also be stripped of their robes for their conflicted rulings! FREE BRADLEY MANNING!!!!!

Poor dimwitted Clarence. Hauling ass fo da massah all deese years sho nuf been a baaaad boy. But das ok. He be safe. Orin be his defense. Orin be da man.

When an experienced Juris Doctor graduate of Yale Law
School fails to comprehend the instructions on IRS
forms, perhaps both the forms and the Juris Doctor
require review.  Review, not simple viewing.

Next question, will this lying piece of excrement pay his back taxes? This is
banana republic type BS, a prize example of our judicial system as it is
today.Mother of God, there is no hope left at all.

A GOP Congress impeach Clarence Thomas, for “forgetting” to pay his taxes and “forgetting” to declare income?  On what planet?  Unless you can find clear evidence of him taking bribes and saying “Yes, I’ll vote your way”, or with an underage female, naked, he’s untouchable.

For a Federal judge to be impeached, his crimes have to be SO egregious that even his own party members stop defending him.  When you see Orren Hatch and Eric Cantor turn on Clarence Thomas, THEN he’s through.  Until then, impeaching the man ain’t happening.

We all know nothing is gonna happen to dear Clarence.

****************

‘Be’s i’s a member of da supremes, I does not hass to does dat
kin of countin.’

If someone talked like that I would expect him to not know
what he was doing or is required to do. But clarence does not
talk like that.

It does put him in a position of being incapable of making
judgements in the supreme court. Down right shows he
should have never been allowed on the scotus. Absolutely
qualifies him for impeachment for income tax evasion or;
“”“A Supreme Court Justice may be impeached by the House of
Representatives and removed from office if convicted in a
Senate trial, but only for the same types of offenses that would
trigger impeachment proceedings for any other government
official under Articles I and II of the Constitution.

Article III, Section 1 states that judges of Article III courts shall
hold their offices “during good behavior.” “The phrase “good
behavior” has been interpreted by the courts to equate to the
same level of seriousness ‘high crimes and misdemeanors”
encompasses.”“”

Can Congress please impeach that S.O.B. now?

RenZo, this seems not to be an income tax evasion issue, but rather a conflict of interest issue. For Justice Thomas to rule on cases involving his wife’s paying clients, is most definitely a conflict of interest.

Anyway, the notion that Justice Thomas did not understand the requirement to report his wife’s income in these instances is pure malarky.

I’d be stunned if he were really pressed to explain this, or to answer for it, in either context.

RenZo:

“Treason?”  That’s helpful.

Maybe Thomas is spending too much time with Charlie Rangel.

No…  He shouls be prosecuted for income tax evasion or lying or conspiracy to evade, lie, defraud, cheat, steal, and commit treason.
No Prosecuting Attorney (except those appointed by Bush, and still in office) would accept such a weak excuse for repeatedly declining to pay his appropriate share.
He didn’t “understand the form” from a US Supremer is totally totally unacceptable, unbelievable and criminal. That nothing will be done about it shows how far we have “progressed” down the road to fair equitable even handed justice for all (i.e. not very far). Many many others have gone to prison for far less.