|
|||
|
Chilean Mine Company Goes Belly-UpPosted on Nov 27, 2010
The company that owns the now-infamous mine where 33 Chileans were rescued after two months underground has agreed to liquidate its assets, avoiding bankruptcy. Much of the money will go to pay miners idled by the disaster and to compensate the government for rescue efforts. —JCL
Advertisement New and Improved CommentsWe are launching a major overhaul of our comments section. In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread. Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts. Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with. Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page. |
By Fat Freddy, November 28, 2010 at 8:08 am Link to this comment
Well, it’s good to see that free market Capitalism is alive and well, somewhere.
Liquidation is a form of bankruptcy. The assets get sold, and the proceeds are used to pay off the creditors, bondholders, and all liabilities, including torts. If there is anything left, it is split up among the shareholders. Usually, there isn’t anything left, which is why almost all companies buy insurance. However, if there is sufficient insurance, the company will be dropped by the insurance company, and the business will not be able to buy (or afford) new insurance. Which will in effect, put the company out of business.
Usually, the way it works is: When the business was originally financed, there was most likely a down payment on the loan. Over the years, the value of the property has increased, and part of the principle has been paid back. Therefore, the bank can afford to “take a hit” on the liquidation price. In other words, the bank can sell the property at less than its value, and still make out. The new buyer will get a discounted price on the assets. The difference between the value of the assets, and the price paid, can be used to purchase more capital goods, improve safety conditions, and hire more workers. That’s the way Capitalism is supposed to work, and why asset deflation isn’t necessarily a bad thing. In fact, it can be quite good, except for the original shareholders. But that’s part of the “risk” of owning a business, and why business owners want to avoid bankruptcy. It keeps them “honest”.
Problems arise when the government gets involved, and tries to “bail out” failed businesses. That’s called “moral hazard”. All you Krugnuts should be familiar with that term.
Report this