|
|||
|
Catholic Bishop ‘Can See the Arguments’ for Condoms in Third WorldPosted on Apr 1, 2010
The highest-ranking Catholic clergyman in England and Wales, Archbishop of Westminster Vincent Nichols, has made the slightest of admissions that he understands why contraception use may seem, well, useful under certain conditions—such as poverty, for example. —KA
Advertisement New and Improved CommentsWe are launching a major overhaul of our comments section. In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread. Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts. Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with. Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page. |
By bogi666, April 1, 2010 at 11:08 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
All of the Catholic clergy, whom oppose birth control, should at least adopt children or better yet the Catholic Church should encourage those Catholics to have children and the Catholic clergy will adopt and raise these children BECAUSE THEY THINK IT’S SUCH A GOOD IDEA to have children.
Report thisBy Bruce, April 1, 2010 at 10:53 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Yes, the Bishop does suffer from a form of mental impairment - it’s called Catholicism. It’s a very powerful block to rationality, this Catholicism. Much mental energy must be expended to maintain the edifice of “theology” against the onslaught of reality. Giant rationalizations must be constructed, cognitive dissonance must be struggled against.
Why expend the energy? For a feeling of belonging, the promise of a life everlasting in the presence of the living (but unchanging) God, and (in the case of the Bishop) for temporal power.
Report thisBy gerard, April 1, 2010 at 10:24 am Link to this comment
Mr.Freeze: I think not! The Archbishop suffers, rather, from a severe case of non-pairment with condoms.
Report thisHe also leans rather heavily on the fact that birthrate goes down when poverty is eliminated because parents don’t have to have lots of kids so that enough of them will survive to grow up and become beggars and support them when they get old.
Yet he does not seem to mention how many famous art works or gold coins the Vatican might donate toward putting an end to poverty.
Just looking at the surface of it, a good deal less time would be required to use condoms than to eliminate world poverty.
But hey! Why not do both—a.s.a.p.?
By mrfreeze, April 1, 2010 at 8:54 am Link to this comment
Is it possible that the Archbishop suffers from a form of mental impairment?
Report this