LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman. Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
May 22, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     elizabeth warren     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

Lock Up Washington

Rise Up or Die

Revenge of the Bear: Russia Strikes Back in Syria

The Promise of a Courageous Al-Jazeera America May Be Fading

GOP Senator's Hypocrisy on Tornado Aid, Jon Stewart Hates Washington, and More

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * Lock Up Washington
 * NEW! * Too Soon to Tell: The Case for Hope, Continued
 * NEW! * Warming Climate Endangers U.K. Farming

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Act of Congress
Daily Rituals
The Girls of Atomic City

Digs

Truthdig Bazaar
The Day Wall Street Exploded

The Day Wall Street Exploded

By Beverly Gage
$18.45

more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Capsize and Trade

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Mar 26, 2010
Flickr / Studio d'Xavier

This protest from 2009 is catching on in 2010.

Cap and trade was all the rage back in 2009, with the market-driven system of curbing emissions seen as a dominant force in addressing global warming problems. Now the concept has seemingly fallen out of favor.

For years, many on the left have criticized cap and trade as just a way for corporations to fake offsets and do little to curb the root causes of environmental degradation. Yet government officials seem to be listening only to right-wing, tea-party protesters, who have effectively labeled cap and trade as “cap and tax” as they rail against any kind of climate change plan—shunning even an admission of climate change’s existence.

Now, a bipartisan bill—led by Sens. Lindsay Graham, John Kerry and Joe Lieberman—is likely to be introduced in April with no mention of the cap and trade scheme.  —JCL

The New York Times:

Less than a year ago, cap and trade was the policy of choice for tackling climate change.

Environmental groups and their foes in industry joined hands to embrace the approach, a market-driven system that sets a ceiling on global warming pollution while allowing companies to trade permits to meet it. President Obama praised it by name in his first budget, and the authors of the House climate and energy bill passed last June largely built their measure around it.

Today, the concept is in wide disrepute, with opponents effectively branding it “cap and tax,” and Tea Party followers using it as a symbol of much of what they say is wrong with Washington.

Mr. Obama dropped all mention of cap and trade from his current budget. And the sponsors of a Senate climate bill likely to be introduced in April, now that Congress is moving past health care, dare not speak its name.

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By notexactlyhuman, April 4, 2010 at 5:30 pm Link to this comment

Workers know all too well that shareholders and
executives aren’t about to take a hit in the wallet for
any additional expenses a corporation incurs. Workers
know the best way for a corporation to shed expense is
by shedding workers. Cap and tax will cost in campaign
contributions, jobs, and votes, thus we are as always
paralyzed within the corporate whirlwind.

Report this

By B. Carfree, March 27, 2010 at 12:14 pm Link to this comment

Further in the article cap and dividend is mentioned as an alternative to cap and trade. While I would much prefer a quota system (which could be implemented immediately for grid power and liquid fuels, with consumer products added later), cap and dividend at least allows the people who are treading lightly upon our wounded planet to escape the “tax”. In fact, those of us who are not piggishly using up all the planet’s resources would stand to be paid slightly for not doing so.
Whatever we do it is clearly imperative that we dramatically reduce our emissions of greenhouse gasses and stop importing crap from Asia. Unfortunately, Americans are so poorly educated in the sciences and so narcissistic that doing something to prevent an imminent catastrophe is next to impossible. Pass the bread, I’m off to the circus.

Report this

By Bat Guano, March 26, 2010 at 6:02 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Cap and Tax is dead. Goldman Sachs has jumped off the bandwagon and since they run the government no matter which party is feeding first at the trough, its over.

Report this
Hulk2008's avatar

By Hulk2008, March 26, 2010 at 4:24 pm Link to this comment

A bi-partisan bill - as John Macenroe would say “You cannot be serious !”

Imagine Congress actually generating something productive !! 

The Tea Partiers and the Republican leadership are sure to kill it off.

Report this

By Miko, March 26, 2010 at 2:35 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Cap-and-trade establishes fake property rights, which
is always a bad thing.  (In particular, with many low-
income people paying more than 50% of their income in
rent, we can see how poorly it worked out with regard
to establishing property rights in land).  A free
market deals only with real property rights (since,
absent government coercion, all fake property rights
are unenforceable) and so cap-and-trade is most
definitely not a free market solution.

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.