LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
2010 Webby Award Winner for Best Political Blog
 
May 26, 2012
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     gay marriage     barack obama     ndaa     robert scheer     chris hedges
Most Read

TED: 'A Money-Soaked Orgy of Self-Congratulatory Futurism'

Truthdiggers of the Week: 400,000 Canadians Launching the ‘Maple Spring’

Russia and Exxon Mobil Sign Arctic Oil Deal

I Can't Hear Myself Think

A Rare Admission That Money Trumps Everything Else

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
Why Bain Questions Matter
OSHA Struggles When Tower Climbers Die

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Better Than We Found It
The Good-Natured Dictator

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101

Truthdig Bazaar
The China Reader: The Reform Era (Vintage)

The China Reader: The Reform Era (Vintage)

By Orville Schell and David Shambaugh
$17.00

Sahel: The End of the Road

Sahel: The End of the Road

By Orville Schell (Afterword), Sebastiao Salgado (Foreword)
$45.00

more items

 
Ear to the Ground

British Government Warned That Iraq War Would Be Illegal

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   

Posted on Jan 26, 2010
U.S. Air Force / Staff Sgt. Nicole Ketchen

British troops stand in formation at Tallil Air Base, Iraq, less than a year after the March 2003 invasion.

Before the invasion of Iraq, British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw’s top legal adviser warned that the use of force was “contrary to international law” and “would amount to the crime of aggression.”

According to testimony in the U.K.‘s Iraq inquiry, Straw allegedly rejected the advice as “dogmatic,” saying “international law was pretty vague.”

The secretary would go on to seek and win a more favorable second opinion from the country’s attorney general just days before invasion.  —PZS

BBC:

Asked by the inquiry about Mr Straw’s analysis of the legal position regarding the invasion of Iraq, Sir Michael told the inquiry: “Obviously there are some areas of international law that can be quite uncertain. This, however, turned exclusively on the interpretation of a specific text and it is one on which I think that international law was pretty clear.”

He told the inquiry his advice had never been rejected by a minister before or since.

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


New and Improved Comments

We are launching a major overhaul of our comments section.

In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread.

Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts.

Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with.

Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page.

By Jim Yell, January 27, 2010 at 8:26 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

It is remarkable that there is this pretence that these crimes happened because the law was vague, the intent was vague.

I see nothing vague. The laws were passed to keep the practices common amongst countries during WWII of arresting people without cause and mistreating them thru lack of basic needs and worse by active and malignant abuse physical and mental.

Our country has been more frankly involved with doing these clearly illegal practices in a manner that has brought shame and dishonor to our supposed superior culture. It should make us all ashamed, more so by these continuing pretenses that we were unsure what was right.

Report this

By Jim, January 26, 2010 at 5:48 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Right, yes, and well…we’re sorry dead people. You know, freedom, democracy, all that stuff.

Report this

By stellarwinds, January 26, 2010 at 4:17 pm Link to this comment

let’s see… what was the punishment for the top guys for such crime at Nuremberg?

could it be…

firing squad!?!?

why then should blair bush and the whole uk-uSSa vermin deserve any less?

Do you mean Nuremberg was nothing but victor’s “justice”?

until that sentence is met, the imperialists have absolutemly no credibility whatsoever and I will support any and all willing and ready to vaporize these 2 scrouge nations and all their treasonous allies to smithereens.

Report this

By NYCartist, January 26, 2010 at 3:10 pm Link to this comment

No! What a surprise.  I guess they weren’t reading
http://www.afterdowningstreet.org

Report this
Newsletter

Get Truthdig in your inbox


 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2012 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.