Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
June 17, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     nsa     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

The FBI May Have Finally Found Jimmy Hoffa

Say Hello to the 'Super Rich'

Bush Caved on NSA Surveillance After Top Officials Threatened to Resign

Controversial Voting Law Struck Down, Snowden ‘Honored’ by Cheney, and More

Truthdigger of the Week: Daniel Ellsberg

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Great Gatsby Economics



The Unwinding


Truthdig Bazaar
The Oxford Shakespeare

The Oxford Shakespeare

By William Shakespeare

more items

 
Ear to the Ground

BP Accuses Halliburton of Destroying Gulf Spill Evidence

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Dec 6, 2011
Gulf oil spill
AP / Gerald Herbert

Halliburton just seems to pop up wherever trouble can be found, such as the Bush White House (through Dick Cheney’s chummy history with the company) and also in the ecopocalypse that was the Gulf of Mexico oil spill in April 2010.

Speaking of that last disaster, Halliburton is now embroiled in a legal battle with British Petroleum, which claims that Halliburton not only made faulty cement that was involved in the Deepwater Horizon oil rig’s meltdown but that the firm did away with evidence about the explosion after the fact. The two corporate giants were battling it out in a New Orleans court this week.  —KA

BBC:

BP made its accusations in a court filing on Monday.

It said that after reviewing the test results, Halliburton “destroyed records of the testing as well as the physical cement samples used in the testing”.

The company also said that Halliburton had failed to produce computer modelling evidence, which showed how the cement performed.

In its motion, BP asked for sanctions against Halliburton, claiming that the company’s cement slurry was “unstable”.

In its turn, Halliburton rejected the claim, saying it would contest it in court.

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By Jim Yell, December 7, 2011 at 10:04 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

What were the chances that Halliburton, a corporation tied up with a man who didn’t serve his nation when he had the opportunity, but has made billions by pandering to the Military-Industrial Complex, a man who created a war built on lies and arrogance would now be accused of destroying evidence and creating a disaster?

That this farce continues is an example of why Obama is wrong to say “let by gones be by gones”. If the Bush Cheney goon squad had been investigated and punished for their crimes and yes, if Nixon had not been given an easy out our laws would still function and we would all be better off, including the gamblers who put their faith in the investment sector. No down side to crimes mean what is not punished is allowed.

Report this
Oceanna's avatar

By Oceanna, December 7, 2011 at 8:37 am Link to this comment

There were certainly more shortcuts, malfunctions, and coverups than
Haliburton’s substandard cement casings.  The workers on the rig continued to
be subjected to conditions that were documented as imminently dangerous. 
There were plenty of warnings of a blow out, but then the pressure to continue
despite them overrode the quickly mounting structural pressure . 

Speaking of coverups, who else authorized and furtively sprayed tons of
dispersants into the Gulf?  Who authorized the deep drilling in an area that was
known to be high risk but with high profit potential for exploitation, to an oil
company that had been repeatedly fined and charged for negligent practices?

We have a dying Gulf now, whose repercussions I believe go beyond the oxygen
starved waters from Corexit, hidden oil plumes, and destroyed marine life.  All
of those dead and dying fish are rotting from the head down, you know.

Report this

By gerard, December 6, 2011 at 9:55 pm Link to this comment

Idea for corporate lawyers who rather enjoy a good fight:  Search out inter-corporate disagreements, encourage the disgruntled CEOs to sue each other. Pit as many pairs of corporations against each other as possible. Donate 50% of your fees to Occupy Corporations. In the process, train as assistants any Occupiers who are interested in learning more about corporate law, particularly as it applies to challenging “corporate personhood.”

Report this

By Lauren Unruh, December 6, 2011 at 3:04 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Correct me if I am wrong, but wasn’t there some evidence that Halliburton had
some kind of insurance deal that paid them off for their loses?

I think it was blown on purpose to make a statement about Hippies and 4/20,
but of course that is just me, taking it very personally. You see I said they were
my people, and the next thing I knew the oil well blew.

It was just too reminiscent of what happened to the Mexicans in Mexico when I
said they were my people - the Bush Cheney administration declared
undeclared war on them.

I remember reading someone had insurance to cover this loss, I just don’t
remember which party it was. Insurance seems like a Cheney move. I’m looking
forward to more investigative journalism reports on the issue, so thanks.

Report this
Oceanna's avatar

By Oceanna, December 6, 2011 at 2:51 pm Link to this comment

So who’s the lesser of the two evils, Haliburton or BP? 

The judicial system will certainly have a run for its money on this one, in more
than one way.

Report this

By felicity, December 6, 2011 at 12:21 pm Link to this comment

Perhaps we all thought (mistakenly, it seems) that
Enron was a bad memory.  Wrong.  Welcome to the Age
of Enron - grotesque bonuses for insiders, a fawning
press, bought politicians, averaged people fleeced by
scheming predators. 

Halliburton has been a blight on the landscape for
years, and will continue to be as it welcomes itself
into the Age of Enron.  (Wonder how this will read in
history books. After all, fits right in with the
histories of once great nations which have inexorably
followed the trajectory of primitive, republican,
imperial, decadence.)

Report this

By surfnow, December 6, 2011 at 10:36 am Link to this comment

what gulf oil spill?  I thought Obama, the msm and BP had successfully covered that all up.

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.