LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman. Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
May 25, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     elizabeth warren     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

Three Questions Left Unanswered by Obama’s Counterterrorism Speech

How to Make a Million Dollars an Hour

Marching in Chicago: Resisting Rahm Emanuel’s Neoliberal Savagery

Colbert Slams PBS for Appeasing Koch Brothers

Corporate Tax Cheats by the Numbers

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * A Cooler Century? Wait and See
New York City’s Summers May Heat Up

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
A Call to Action
Act of Congress

Digs

Truthdig Bazaar
ENTER_ALT_TEXT

Liberating the Schoolhouse

By Wellford Wilms
$19.00 Buy direct from the publisher - Use Truthdig discount code TD35

more items

 
Ear to the Ground

Banking Regulation Team Pitches New Payment Rules

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Dec 27, 2010
Flickr / kevindooley (CC-BY)

All eyes on the money lenders: The Swiss-based Basel Committee on Banking Supervision is nudging big banks toward more transparency.

An international panel of banking regulators from 27 nations is aiming to crack down on outlandish pay packages for industry executives by proposing a new set of rules that call for more transparency and, wonder of wonders, some correlation between top-level salaries and bonuses relative to the performance of the institutions themselves.  —KA

AP via Google News:

The panel’s six-page plan would require banks to disclose more information about how pay and compensation are awarded and are related to job performance, how a company is organized and the “long-term performance measures” of the company itself.

Under the plan, banks would have to disclose the “number and total amount of guaranteed bonuses during the financial year,” how a bank’s pay and compensation may have been adjusted because of weak performance, and how much deferred compensation remains outstanding.

The European Union and other nations have been setting rules on bankers’ pay to prevent the kind of excessive risk-taking that they fear contributed to the crisis. Earlier this month, EU regulators slapped limits onto cash payouts and banking bonuses.

Some bankers have expressed skepticism of having to go beyond what regulators already require, but the Basel committee said its latest proposal would “add greater specificity” to previous guidance on how much banks should have to disclose publicly.

Read more

More Below the Ad

Advertisement


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

Napolean DoneHisPart's avatar

By Napolean DoneHisPart, December 29, 2010 at 2:38 pm Link to this comment

Well said NABNYC,

Where can we find the ‘disclosure’ on Obama’s $200M payoff?

Report this

By NABNYC, December 29, 2010 at 1:44 pm Link to this comment

We need to stop letting the ruling class get away with claiming that “transparency” and “disclosure” is a cure for corruption.  It isn’t.  Neither has any value when the public has no real say in what happens.  We now have disclosures showing that Obama, for example, received $200 million from various sources before he was elected.  From which anyone could conclude the guy was bought and paid for before he took office, and we really need to ban all contributions to any politician.  But that doesn’t happen, so the disclosure of the bribes paid to the politicians is of absolutely no value at all to the public.  We can’t stop it.  We can’t do anything about it.  So what’s the point?

What the politicians should do to stop the looting of businesses by the insiders is simple:  declare that all compensation of any type—income, salary, stock options, healthcare, life insurance, pension contributions—in excess of $250,000 cannot be written off by the business.  It is not tax deductible because it is not a “reasonable” business expense.  Like you cannot write off a $1000 bottle of champagne for lunch.  That would end this practice. 

Disclosure is a tired and useless tactic designed to convince the public that everything is on the up and up, but it isn’t, and there’s nothing we can do to stop it.  What do I think about these obscene salaries?  They should be taxed at 90%.  That would end the practice.  Not “disclosures.”  With a “disclosure” and $3.25 I can get a cup of coffee at Starbucks.

Report this

By berniem, December 28, 2010 at 3:12 pm Link to this comment

Hey, let the banksters get paid whatever they want; just tax them a the Eisenhower-era rates and eliminate loopholes then use the money to stimulate the economy!

Report this
Napolean DoneHisPart's avatar

By Napolean DoneHisPart, December 28, 2010 at 1:10 am Link to this comment

They are getting bonuses because they were SUPPOSED to run the thing into the ground… the insurance bet was the payoff!!!  Then they could buy cheap with the money swindled from the bailout… then they could repay the borrowed money.. or just add to the tax bill, either way, they win with a massive leverage play and transfer of wealth the world hadn’t seen in a while… 

Would have tempted King Solomon to want a piece of the action.

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.