|
|||
|
Bachmann Eyeing White House Run?Posted on Jan 26, 2011
Here are two words that ought to strike fear into the hearts of many Americans: President Bachmann. Although it’s definitely a long shot, and she’d be up against none other than Sarah Palin, Rep. Michele Bachmann could have been positioning herself to represent the tea party movement in a bigger way than just her response to Obama’s State of the Union address on Tuesday night. John Nichols faces this alarming prospect, and critiques Bachmann’s speech, in his column for The Nation on Wednesday.
Advertisement Previous item: 9 Out of 10 Viewers Approve of Obama's Proposals Next item: Hundreds Arrested as Egypt Protests Continue New and Improved CommentsWe are launching a major overhaul of our comments section. In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread. Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts. Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with. Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page. |
By nathkatun7, February 3, 2011 at 8:57 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
The University that awarded Congresswoman Bachmann a law degree should be ashamed (Please don’t tell me it was Oral Roberts University). If the founding fathers (I suppose she included the Southern founding fathers who owned slaves) worked tirelessly to abolish slavery how come the country fought a civil war over slavery? Did the law school that granted Bachmann a law degree fail to teach, or even mention, the 1857 Supreme Court’s Dred Scott decision? If everyone who came to America was welcomed as equal, regardless of race, then why was it necessary to pass three Constitutional Amendments: the Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth? Did Rep. Bachmann learn any thing about the Jim Crow period that ushered in legal segregation of the races in the Southern States? Is it possible that the college and the law school she attended omitted any mention of the Supreme Court’s “Plessy v. Ferguson” decision? I have a sneaking suspicion that, Rep. Bachmann, a college educated and a lawyer, is not that ignorant. Rather, she seems determined to re-write history to conform with teabaggers’ claims that their mission is to restore the ideals of the pure and blameless founding fathers.
Who is dumber?; Michelle for saying the Founding Fathers eliminated slavery, or Sarah for saying that the Soviet Union collapsed because of Sputnik. What do you think?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qideaIA_NpI
Report thisBy drbhelthi, January 31, 2011 at 1:38 am Link to this comment
Neither Bachman nor Palin is affiliated with the NAZI
element of the CIA/MOSSAD, thus do not possess one of
the two basic qualifications for election. The
second requirement is a minimal height of six feet,
the only characteristic statistically associated with
persons in leadership positions. Nor has a member of
the John D. Rockefeller family promised either of
them the U.S. Presidency – eventually.
However, neither is affiliated with the CIA/MOSSAD-
Report thissponsored uprising in Egypt, intended to replace
Mubarak with a CIA/MOSSAD puppet. How many Million
$$$$ of U.S. Taxpayer monies has the CIA/MOSSAD
passed out, bribing local CIA/MOSSAD pawns ?
Dollars to which neither Bachman nor Palin has
access.
By Shenonymous, January 30, 2011 at 12:13 pm Link to this comment
“She can easily win the Republican nomination though.”
It is highly unlikely. Republicans are a patriarchical and chauvinistic
Report thisgroup. Can anyone imagine they would ever bow to a woman? Even
the less than divine Sarah?
By Rodney, January 29, 2011 at 4:11 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
There are not enough,
Report thisracists,rednecks,birthers,religious bigots,cowboys,and
tea baggers for her to get elected president. She can
easily win the Republican nomination though.
By drbhelthi, January 29, 2011 at 10:28 am Link to this comment
Folk who are acquainted with the inside track, who know
what has happened and why, to the U.S., since the
C.I.A. was created, and the true identity of the
secretive head for approx. forty years, cannot get too
concerned with Palin and Bachman-types.
These two people had little to do with invoking Hitler-
Report thistype controls on the U.S. Citizenry, and driving the
U.S. into bankruptcy and possible military takeover.
By Inherit The Wind, January 29, 2011 at 12:42 am Link to this comment
Meghan McCain described Bachmann as “The poor man’s Sarah Palin”. It’s an hilarious description but she’s got it backwards. Trailer Trash Sarah is the poor man’s Michelle Bachmann.
Report thisBy SimpleMind, January 28, 2011 at 11:45 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
There was an infamous and often-described encounter between Sarah Palin and Andrew Halcro during their primary contest. Halcro, the ultimate policy and fact guy, had just finished a talk in which he had demonstrated his points with hard facts, the antithesis of Palin-speak. However, in a private talk after, Palin observed to Halcro that facts really don’t matter. And so enormous crowds of seemingly adults will listen to a Palin or Bachmann word-salad and somehow hear in that solutions to infinitely complex diplomatic, economic and social problems that have defied solution for a hundred years. It doesn’t matter that Bachmann just made stuff up. I’d bet that not one in a hundred Tea Baggers will even remember anything Bachmann actually said. They are listening to some tape inside their own heads, one that tells them that if just didn’t have some smart-ass Harvard-educated black guy in the White House, we’d suddenly all become contented, small-town white folks with jobs down at the local hardware store – if we’d just end social security, there wouldn’t be any poor elderly people living on catfood in unheated city apartments – if we’d just repeal healthcare, there’d suddenly be wise, old Marcus Welby general practitioners on every street corner – I mean, why does everything have to be so complicated? So facts don’t matter. More accurately, facts are the very problem.
Report thisBy Jbrandonloberg, January 27, 2011 at 10:46 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
i’m convinced that people like Bachmann don’t know what they believe in; they’re simply trying to capitalise on conservatives’ righteous indignation after the 2008 election.
i don’t remember who said it first, but it’s a case of being sore losers, as opposed to having a legitimate grievance pertaining to any one issue. As i’ve said many times in the past, conservative Republicans are chagrined because they had such high hopes for Bush, and when he couldn’t deliver, the inevitable consequence was Obama, and the Democrats’ takeover of Congress. That’s what happens in a two-party system. Love him or despise him, Obama’s election in 2008 was far more an eventuality than it was a victory. The GOP ran McCain–and especially Palin–as a crapshoot; they knew it was doubtful they would win, but they wanted to see what would happen. Today’s teabaggers, and pols like Michelle Bachmann, are merely manifestations of conservative hand-wringing; recalcitrant children whining about their decline in power. However, just as entertainers (take Marilyn Manson, for example) are blamed for the sometimes overzealousness of their fans, the outlandish rhetoric and apocalyptic tone employed by people like Bachmann, and does make an impression upon those with compromised intellects. Consider the so-called ‘Hutaree’: it’s impossible for any rationally thinking person to take a group like this seriously, and my guess is even the FBI didn’t seriously give shrift to the notion that they posed any legitimate threat to the government, however, if a few far-right nutjobs decided they could catalyse a revolution by gunning down government employees or blowing up a post office, that’s more than enough reason to intervene. Bachman, Palin, Beck, etc. should consider the volatility of their audiences’ mental health, and avoid feeding the animals.
Report thisBy who'syourdebs, January 27, 2011 at 1:04 pm Link to this comment
It is a demonstrated flaw of our society that a crackpot like Frau Bachmann can have her conspiracy theories disseminated across the nation by a major cable news outlet like CNN. Yes, they put American politic’s answer to the Stepford Wives on with the President’s State of the Union message and Ryan’s Republican Party rebuttal. Guess these cable giants will do anything for ratings, huh? I had to laugh recently at a female pundit’s portrayal of Palin and Bachmann’s male supporters as Viagra-crazed baby-boomers experiencing a second adolescence. It can’t be anything these women have to say, can it?
Report thisBy felicity, January 27, 2011 at 11:55 am Link to this comment
It turned my stomach when the picture on my tube was a
Bachmann standing in front of the photo of the raising
of the flag on Iwo Jima (which I happen to remember
vividly.) She, dedicated to eliminating Medicare as we
know it, would have no compunction denying the still-
living vets of WWII - maybe some of the very men
raising that flag - access to health care.
She literally makes me sick.
Report thisBy drbhelthi, January 27, 2011 at 10:48 am Link to this comment
Anyway, the no. 2 son of GHWBushSr did such an
Report thisexcellent job of seducing the state of Florida to
violate the US Constitution, and insult our service-
people overseas, in 2004. He might do an equally
excellent job in the White House, seems to be the hint.
However, whipping him in front of Hilly at the last
minute, might be a bigger job than a few big NAZIs
think.
By Atlanta Roofing, January 27, 2011 at 2:17 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Michell Bachmann is a lunatic. If she is not on medication, she should be. She is an embarrassment to all Americans and it is hard to believe that mainstream Republicans think she has any credibility. Today, I heard her claim that the founding fathers ended slavery. She specifically mentioned John Quincy Adams, Jefferson and Washington. Jefferson and Washington, of course, were slave owners. And I guess she forgot what the Civil War was about and why it was not until 1964 that Congress finally, over heavy Republican objection, finally got around to passing the Civil Right and Voting Rights Act. She is just completely insane.
Report thisBy The Messiah, January 27, 2011 at 1:27 am Link to this comment
Samson,
Report thisThank you for reminding us what is most important. We do get distracted by the
decoys.
By Joe, January 26, 2011 at 9:39 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Love to see Bachmann and Palin BOTH run.
They’d completely split the GOP primary vote and throw
Report thisthe party into chaos trying to pick a female ‘savior.’
By Montana, January 26, 2011 at 9:25 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Michele Bachmann did not say how we got here from eight years of poor leadership, two wars without end, diminsihed Civil liberties. Its like she crawl out from under a rock just to complain about our current President. We all know that Americans for Prosperity and Freedom Works started the Tea Party, grasroots, please. She like Sarah Palin, Christine O’Donnell, Sharron Angle and Linda McMahon, they are just not right but funny. I especially like the clip of Bachmann saying that the founding fathers abolished slavery, wow, what a liar, not the first or last time that will happen. Does anyone with self-respect real believe her?
Report thisBy CaptRon, January 26, 2011 at 7:25 pm Link to this comment
Would be interested to find a list of her contributors. I know she was in Washington D.C. last night for the speech, but don’t know where she made her speech from. I did see something on the front of her podium that said Iowan’s for something. The first primary is in Iowa and the home of Senator Grassley who I think wants to be King(or in this case Queen) maker. Could be a Bachmann-Palin ticket if Sarah can decide to rid her anchor Todd, who keeps getting caught with his pants down. Apparently he not only gets the message but also the massage, and keeps contributing to Sarah’s hypocrisy of family values. Might be something to the Sarah affair rumors as well(where are you Levi?). Everything about her seems to end a lie. As for Bachmann, she can’t even find the camera that would benefit her the most so her run for the White House may end up a run for the “Outhouse”.
Report thisBy mrfreeze, January 26, 2011 at 6:44 pm Link to this comment
With so many unemployed and underemployed Americans out here, how is it that someone of Bachmann’s intelligence and personality can hold a job…................and a job that affects the lives of others?
She (along with a huge number of other public figures) is the perfect example of why the U.S. has become a 2nd rate nation.
Report thisBy Inherit The Wind, January 26, 2011 at 4:55 pm Link to this comment
The only difference between Bachmann and Palin is that Bachmann’s won a bunch of elections and, as far I can tell, Palin’s won 2: Gov once and mayor of Wasilla once.
Both joyously share in being bat-shit crazy, hateful and totally un-American.
Report thisBy Shenonymous, January 26, 2011 at 4:49 pm Link to this comment
Chris Matthews description of Michele Bachmann is perfect: A Balloon
Head. A paradigm idiot who thinks John Adams ended slavery.
Can anyone really imagine this whacko the head of this country?
Report thisChoke choke gag gag. So whose money is she going to waste?
By Samson, January 26, 2011 at 4:46 pm Link to this comment
So what, is Sarah Palin running out of steam as a bogeyman?
You see a constant stream of this propaganda from the Democrat noise machine. Be very afraid. Run off and donate to your local millionaire pro-war corporate Democrat because of some ridiculous bogeyman story.
The Republicans always run a highly controlled nomination process. Have since Nixon or before. The candidate with the most political power in the party and the most money will win. The Republicans do not tolerate insurgents taking their nomination. It may look like a contest at first, but raw political power and money ALWAYS win the Republican nomination.
Remember that, then ask why the Democrats would rather be talking about ridiculous bogeyman scare stories, rather than say
—Democrats extend Bush’s tax cuts to the rich
—Democrats extend the Patriot Act
—Democrats keep all of Bush’s wars going and going.
—Democrats want to take your retirement to pay for the wars and the wall street bailouts.
—Obama gives control of the Internet and the White House to GE.
Gee, why is it a Democrat shill like Nicholls is spinning these silly scare stories instead of talking about real issues like these? Hmm, guess its kinda obvious
Report thisBy J, January 26, 2011 at 3:58 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
As a Minnesotan all I can say is ... pleasegodpleasegodpleasegodpleasegodpleasegodpleasegodpleasegodpleasegodplease
godpleasegodpleasegodpleasegodpleasegodpleasegod let her pull a Palin ... quit her job and loose and write a book and fall into infamy.
J
Report this