pro choice, it’s about the mother and father’s choice

The anti abortion people should not be allowed to dictate their beliefs onto others who do not feel the same way they do. I may not believe that the way they live is the RIGHT way to be or do, but I do not force my beliefs onto them and try to make it the law of the land. If they are so against abortion, then prove it. Adopt all the children left because they are to old, a behavior problem,have birth defects, etc and the same goes for foster care children. Until every excess child who is “not wanted” in this country is placed into a loving home, these people have no right to try to force women to produce more unwanted excessive humans on the planet. Tell them that actions speak louder than words and not the kind of actions we have witnessed in the past by anti-abortion fanatics. Take these children out there now before you add to an already growing problem.

When these vocal male football players give birth, then perhaps they will have a more realistic view of what a woman goes through from conception to birth, until that day happens no male should have any say what so ever in the abortion issue. Given the fact that men are usually the first to tell a woman to “get rid of it” or “do whatever you want as long as I don’t have to pay for it”. Women have heard this since time began. The anti-abortion people live in the land of fantasy thinking every baby is a wanted baby, nothing could be further from the truth in many cases.

BTW they are wasting their money on ads during the super bowl, we never watch it.

Just for once it would be nice if the fucking Xtians went somewhere and masturbated with their Bibles or whatever it is they do.

Fuck us in the family, that’s what they’re trying to do.

The Super Bowl?  Is nothing sacred?

-Wexler

CBS, of wardrobe malfunction, stoops to a new low! Would they run a pro choice ad?

I say, boycott the network - right after the game!

What I find most offensive is that this same network refused to carry paid commercials because they were politically motivated and raised moral questions that might seem divisive. If it were truly an even playing surface for those who wished to espouse their view of the world, than it might be tolerable (although I do not think it fair).  However, the decision on what philosophic bent is allowed to be broadcast and what is relegated to the trash heap remains a corporate decision.  The courts recent opinion does nothing to provide fair and equitable rights to free speech, it simple narrows the decision making to those who already control speech, content and delivery.  Focus on the family needs to focus on its own damn family.

Why do you have to be a “quasi-religious looner” to be anti-abortion?

Why can’t you just be anti-abortion and leave it at that?

How is your intolerance different from their intolerance?

So, is Tebow the argument ‘for’ abortion? Against? Making the case that quasi-
religious looners need rehabilitation?

I love it. The decision the Tebows made years ago should be exactly the same decision all other couples should make because all other couples are exactly the same -  same financial circumstance, same relationship etc. - as the Tebows were.  The hubris is mind-blowing.